search for: sacks

...49 pushed data pkts: 6271 SYN/FIN pkts sent: 1/1 SYN/FIN pkts sent: 1/1 req 1323 ws/ts: Y/Y req 1323 ws/ts: Y/Y adv wind scale: 9 adv wind scale: 7 req sack: Y req sack: Y sacks sent: 0 sacks sent: 0 urgent data pkts: 0 pkts urgent data pkts: 0 ================================ TCP connection 2: host c: delta host d: echo complete conn: yes first packet: Tue Apr 17 1...

All, Recently on an Ultra 10 running Solaris 8: -- SunOS toasty 5.8 Generic_108528-20 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10, -- using a pre-compiled package of rsync 2.5.6 from sunfreeware.com: -- bash-2.03$ rsync --version rsync version 2.5.6 protocol version 26 Copyright (C) 1996-2002 by Andrew Tridgell and others <http://rsync.samba.org/> Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-06:08.sack Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Infinite loop in SACK handling Category: core Module: netinet Announced:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=443 ------- Additional Comments From nothingel@hotmail.com 2006-03-17 20:07 MET ------- sorry for the delay...I'll check this out hopefully first of next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-06:08.sack Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Infinite loop in SACK handling Category: core Module: netinet Announced:

Hi folks, I have the following in my firewall (condensed version) [CentOS 4.2: 2.6.9-11.EL.i686 kernel]: INPUT: --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -p tcp -j REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset -j REJECT OUTPUT: ACCEPT The connection is over a wireless link so packets _do_ get dropped even though throughput is around 100-400 kB/s (depending on atmospheric conditions, etc.) Now I've noticed

--7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Netfilter Core Team Security Advisory =20 CVE: CAN-2003-0467 Subject: Netfilter / NAT Remote DoS Released: 01 Aug 2003 Effects: Under limited circumstances, a remote user may be able to crash

...sent:       1/1           SYN/FIN pkts sent:       0/0           req 1323 ws/ts:          Y/Y           req 1323 ws/ts:          N/N           adv wind scale:            0           adv wind scale:            0           req sack:                  Y           req sack:                  N      sacks sent:                0           sacks sent:                0           urgent data pkts:          0 pkts      urgent data pkts:          0 pkts      urgent data bytes:         0 bytes     urgent data bytes:         0 bytes      mss requested:          1460 bytes     mss requested:             0...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=464 ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-07-15 18:38 MET ------- Jurgen: you are behind a box which doesn't understand the SACK option. From your trace: 02:52:32.237095 IP 134.76.88.65.11064 > 84.132.150.225.32805: P 237274514:237275954(1440) ack 372631662 win 181 <nop,nop,timestamp 229942196

Hello All, I'm running Samba 3.0.24 as PDC and file server on Gentoo Linux, AMD64, 2.6.19 kernel, 100MBit/s network, and experience quite slow file transfers from Samba to WinXP SP2 clients: the speed is varying, but is about 1-2Mb/s at best. I spent quite some time investigating the issue, here are the intermediate results: 1) This happens only when transferring _from_ _Samba_ to

--- Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > 2007/7/25, Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com>: > > > > Hi > > > > I have downloaded a FLAC file somewhere and when trying to decode > it to > > WAV it gives the error message: ERROR, MD5 signature mismatch > > So my question is now: are FLAC files that give the error message > above > >

Hi, We have problems to backup a large /home directory (+/- 12Go) with rsync (daemon mode) and BackupPC on ADSL static IP 4Mbps/380Kbps for the backed-up machine and Internet 10Mbps for the backup server, the rsync options are: '--numeric-ids', '--perms', '--owner', '--group', '--devices',

Hi All, I am trying to set up samba simply as a standalone Primary Domain Controller, but unfortunatley - for the last three days at least, it just does not want to play! i cannot find a problem in my smb.conf file and to proove that it works, i can log into the samba server via the linux command line with smbclient. The problem is the windows machines, when to go to log into the domain, i get

Why isn't the compression level added in a metadata block by the flac encoder itself (just like the encoder version)? In this way all programs that read the file can see what compression level was used. thx 2007/7/4, Scot Thompson <scot.thompson@cox.net>: > > This has been asked many times. The answer is no. I suggest saving the > compression level into a tag for future

Hello, This is on Centos 6 and not something I think is wrong with Centos 6 but I am looking to see if anybody else has experienced this and if there is solution. So thanks up front for indulging me. Because Linux makes routing decisions before SNAT it is causing problems when trying to use FTP with two upstream providers in a load balanced setup. Other than ftp, things seem to work OK. Below

yes I know I can do that, but my question is if there is software to edit FLAC files without having to uncompress to WAV/recompress to FLAC. 2007/7/23, Avuton Olrich <avuton@gmail.com>: > > On 7/23/07, Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > > hi > > > > does somebody know software for editing FLAC files? So I just want to > cut > > some pieces

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have set up Samba-3.0.11 to retrive account information from W2k server via winbind, and it works. But is takes about 10 sec. to retrive the information. I have dumped some traffic from the request, and it looks like this: A lot of these: 21:21:55.133423 172.20.3.131.1077 > 172.20.3.130.137: NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; UNICAST

2007/7/3, Ralph Giles <giles@xiph.org>: > > On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 07:18:17PM +0200, Harry Sack wrote: > > > Can anybody tell me what the maximum filesize is for an image file to be > > included in a FLAC file? I'm just exploring this feature and I didn't > find > > this yet > > The metadata block length field is 24 bits, so the upper limit is

On 9/6/07, Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > it's really not complicated I think: only api changes to write on any Please get started writing a patch, immediately. -- avuton -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.

2007/4/7, Alex Jones <alex@weej.com>: > > On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 17:49 +0200, Harry Sack wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have read somewhere there exist 2 extensions for FLAC files: .flac > > and .fla > > Why is this and what's the difference between them? > > Nothing. File name extensions don't mean anything. Don't be confused > into thinking