Displaying 20 results from an estimated 215 matches for "sa_famili".
Did you mean:
sa_family
2004 Mar 26
1
nmbd dying
nmbd has been dying on me occasionally. I'm running mandrake 9.2 with
samba3-server-3.0.0-2mdk. We've got our users in ldap but I'd seen this
symptom previously when I was using an earlier version of samba that didn't
support ldap. There is nothing useful in the logs and a PS shows a nmb
process still running.
This last time around, I had a ptrace running on both nmbd
2015 Jul 29
2
Bug#793921: tftpd-hpa: IPv6 address cannonization breaks IPv4
Take 2 at bouncing this to the rest of the original recipients through a
different MTA, since mail.zytor.com refused to accept it the first time.
Please re-add Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at obsidianresearch.com> and
793921 at bugs.debian.org to the CC for replies.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:34:00PM +0930, Ron wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:45:30PM -0600, Jason
2012 Jun 11
1
tftp-hpa bug on aliased interface and recent kernels.
So as of recent kernels, this change helps:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=network/tftp/tftp-hpa.git;a=commitdiff;h=c6d2c36b1a2b1986cab7aebb72d120fa118bdfeb
But there is still a flaw. Notably, if tftpd is running with AF_UNSPEC (as
it will if ipv6 support is desired), myrecvfrom will fail to setsockopt to
get the data back on the first pass.
I'd guess the least disruptive change to get to be
2016 May 31
2
[Bug 1071] New: nftables: set does not work within inet table with option flags interval
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1071
Bug ID: 1071
Summary: nftables: set does not work within inet table with
option flags interval
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: nft
2004 Jan 06
1
[PATCH] possible bug in bindresvport
nfsmount doesnt work anymore for me. This patch fixes at least udp nfs
mounts. tcp does still hang. client and server is 2.6.
--- /dev/shm/bindresvport.c 2003-12-08 02:33:24.000000000 +0100
+++ klibc/inet/bindresvport.c 2004-01-06 21:05:02.283779072 +0100
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ int bindresvport(int sd, struct sockaddr
if (sin == NULL) {
sin = &me;
2008 Aug 11
0
rsync failure with error 12
I am running rsync over a VPN. The connection has been stable for some
time, but recently it has started failing. I am including the strace of
the failure below. Basically, the client disconnects typically with an
error 12. I have 3 other clients using the same openvpn/rsync
configuration, and those are stable, so I am fairly confident this is
something on this particular link.
The
2015 Jun 21
3
dovecot auth using 100% CPU
Every few days I find that dovecot auth is using all my CPU.
This is from dovecot 2.2.13, I've just upgraded to 2.2.18
strace -r -p 17956 output:
Process 17956 attached
0.000000 lseek(19, 0, SEEK_CUR) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek)
0.000057 getsockname(19, {sa_family=AF_LOCAL, NULL}, [2]) = 0
0.000043 epoll_ctl(15, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 19, {EPOLLIN|EPOLLPRI|EPOLLERR|EPOLLHUP,
2013 Nov 08
1
Rsync hanging, even with timeout and contimeout specified
Here's the details and some debugging I did for starters, but I have no
idea where to proceed from here. Help please? Command to reproduce should
be in the strace output below.
-Dan
P.S. Sorry for sending this a few times; I think only one will make it
through to the list since I wasn't subscribed initially.
$ rsync --version
rsync version 3.1.0 protocol version 31
Copyright (C)
2009 Mar 20
0
tftpd-hpa can't reopen /dev/log
Hi,
here is an example of tftpd-hpa running in daemon mode failing to
reopen /dev/log. No wonder, as it tries after chrooting.
Cheers,
Feri.
$ sudo strace -f -p 2356
Process 2356 attached - interrupt to quit
select(5, [4], NULL, NULL, NULL) = 1 (in [4])
setsockopt(4, SOL_IP, IP_PKTINFO, [1], 4) = 0
recvmsg(4, {msg_name(16)={sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(57109),
2011 Nov 12
5
[Bug 1950] New: sshd tries to bind over and over to ::1 for several seconds
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1950
Bug #: 1950
Summary: sshd tries to bind over and over to ::1 for several
seconds
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.9p1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
2006 May 23
11
how to debug RTNETLINK invalid argument?
Hey,
I am getting an invalid argument trying to insert a qdisc:
[root@emu-5 iproute2]# tc qdisc add dev eth0 root xcp capacity 50Mbit
limit 500
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
I''m not sure whats wrong here, because i can successfully insert this
qdisc on other computers of mine.
How can i debug this?
Thanks!
George
2008 Sep 30
1
Broken pipe, x86_64 CentOS 5.2
Hi All,
I have a problem with torque (openPBS) on x86_64 CentOS 5.2. Just to add there's
no problem on a 32bit CentOS 5.2 or 64bit Ubuntu 8.04.
The problem is that pbs_mom's child quits without giving any error logs.
[root at frodo9 torque-2.3.3]# strace -f pbs_mom
.
.
.
bind(6, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(15002),
sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}, 16) = 0
time(NULL)
2008 Jan 28
1
Dovecot-auth crash
I wrote mail as different used few minutes ago... Here is better result
from strace.
23:56:00.390607 close(18) = 0
23:56:00.390792 open("/usr/lib/sasl2/libplain.la", O_RDONLY) = 18
23:56:00.390858 close(18) = 0
23:56:00.390904 open("/usr/lib/sasl2/libldapdb.la", O_RDONLY) = 18
23:56:00.390963 fstat64(18, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=848, ...}) =
2006 Oct 28
1
Cygwin rsync to RH rsync server
Ok I updated both systems to rsync-2.6.8 and found the info on setting
strace on the server. Here are the trace logs, there are two calls the
first is just the module list which finishes normally the second is the
file list in the test module which fails after the list.
By the way I have no idea what any of this means (sorry if I'm not
supposed to post traces to the list)
2019 Mar 08
1
Dovecot v2.3.5 released
On 7.3.2019 23.37, A. Schulze via dovecot wrote:
>
> Am 07.03.19 um 17:33 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot:
>
>>> test-http-client-errors.c:2989: Assert failed: FALSE
>>> connection timed out ................................................. : FAILED
> Hello Aki,
>
>> Are you running with valgrind or on really slow system?
> I'm not aware my buildsystem
2015 Jun 21
0
dovecot auth using 100% CPU
What do you see in the logs?
My guess is that someone is trying a brute force auth against you,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Edward
> Betts
> Sent: domingo, 21 de Junho de 2015 10:42
> To: dovecot at dovecot.org
> Subject: dovecot auth using 100% CPU
>
> Every few days I find that dovecot auth is using
2015 Aug 07
0
Bug#793921: tftpd-hpa: IPv6 address cannonization breaks IPv4
On 07/29/2015 01:45 AM, Ron via Syslinux wrote:
>
> Take 2 at bouncing this to the rest of the original recipients through a
> different MTA, since mail.zytor.com refused to accept it the first time.
>
> Please re-add Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at obsidianresearch.com> and
> 793921 at bugs.debian.org to the CC for replies.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:34:00PM
2015 Jan 03
2
Samba4 Kerberos kinit does not resolve kdc hostname
Hi,
i am really depressed at this moment. I set up an domain controller
using samba4 and an raspberry pi.
I can join the domain and everything works BUT kerberos has some strange
problems resolving my raspberry hostname.
First of all some information:
Raspberry pi is DHCP Server and DNS-Server (BIND9).
First of all the configurations:
Code:
/usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf
# Global
2017 Jan 29
2
[PATCH tftpd-hpa] tftpd: don't use AI_CANONNAME and AI_ADDRCONFIG to resolve addresses for bind
AI_CANONNAME is only relevant when the resulting official name is used,
which is not the case in tftpd for the address to bind to. Also
AI_ADDRCONFIG isn't helpful. This flag is good for sockets used to
connect(2) somewhere. But for listening sockets it makes tftpd fail to
start when -a 0.0.0.0:69 is passed and no network device is up yet.
This addresses Debian bug
2015 Jan 03
2
Samba4 Kerberos kinit does not resolve kdc hostname
Hi,
/etc/resolv.conf looks exactly like this:
domain family.rapsberry.local
search family.rapsberry.local
nameserver 192.168.178.222
So to answer your question: yes the only Nameserver the raspberry has is
itself.
Greetings
Am 2015-01-03 um 7:40 PM schrieb Rowland Penny:
> On 03/01/15 16:31, Robert Hartmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i am really depressed at this moment. I set