Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "s_reserved_gdt_block".
Did you mean:
s_reserved_gdt_blocks
2005 Jun 20
0
[patch 2/3] fs/ext3/resize.c: fix sparse warnings
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: sparse-fs_ext3_resize.patch
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/attachments/20050620/8e33ffa8/attachment.ksh>
2005 Feb 15
1
[PATCH] ext3: Fix sparse -Wbitwise warnings.
...======================
--- linux-warnings/include/linux/ext3_fs.h (revision 14)
+++ linux-warnings/include/linux/ext3_fs.h (revision 20)
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@
*/
__u8 s_prealloc_blocks; /* Nr of blocks to try to preallocate*/
__u8 s_prealloc_dir_blocks; /* Nr to preallocate for dirs */
- __u16 s_reserved_gdt_blocks; /* Per group desc for online growth */
+ __le16 s_reserved_gdt_blocks; /* Per group desc for online growth */
/*
* Journaling support valid if EXT3_FEATURE_COMPAT_HAS_JOURNAL set.
*/
Index: linux-warnings/fs/ext3/super.c
===================================================================...
2007 Mar 29
3
tune2fs -l stale info
Hello,
I just noticed that 'tune2fs -l' did not returned a "lively" updated
information regarding the free inodes count (looks like it's always
correct after unmounting). It became suprising after an online resizing
operation, where the total inode count was immediatly updated (grown in
my case) but the free inode count was the same: one could deduce that
suddenly a lot of
2005 Dec 22
2
ext2online failure
...165
group 15 inode table has offset 2, not 165
group 16 inode table has offset 2, not 165
group 17 inode table has offset 2, not 165
group 18 inode table has offset 2, not 165
group 19 inode table has offset 2, not 165
group 20 inode table has offset 2, not 165
ext2_get_reserved
Found 161 blocks in s_reserved_gdt_blocks
using 161 reserved group descriptor blocks
21 old groups, 1 blocks
29 new groups, 1 blocks
Filling last group to 688128 blocks
ext2_ioctl: EXTEND group to 688128 blocks
ext2online: ext2_ioctl: Invalid argument
ext2online: unable to resize /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
[root at ppstest13 ~]# d...
2004 Dec 09
1
resize2fs on LVM on MD raid on Fedora Core 3 - inode table conflicts in fsck
Hi.
I'm attempting to setup a box here to be a file-server for all my data.
I'm attempting to resize an ext3 partition to demonstrate this
capability to myself before fully committing to this system as the
primary data storage. I'm having some problems resizing an ext3
filesystem after I've resized the underlying logical volume. Following
the ext3 resize, fsck spits out lots