search for: s_ptr

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "s_ptr".

Did you mean: a_ptr
2004 Nov 29
1
data is getting corrupted
...RACTER( filename ) ); PROTECT(ans = allocVector(INTSXP, 1)); PROTECT( sample_in = AS_LIST( sample_in ) ); sample_ptr = build_sample_from_sexp( sample_in ); write_sample_to_file( &return_code, CHAR(STRING_ELT(filename, 0)), sample_ptr, N_SPECIES, SPECIES_PTR ); if( return_code != CONIFERS_SUCCESS ) { Rprintf( "unable to write %s\n", CHAR(STRING_ELT(filename, 0)) ); INTEGER(ans)[0] = -1; UNPROTECT(2); UNPROTECT( 1 ); return ans; } INTEGER(ans)[0] = 0; UNPROTECT(2); UNPROTECT( 1 ); return a...
2010 Jul 14
2
[LLVMdev] Figuring out the parameters of the Call Instruction
...ased on that I have the following C Code 1 #include <stdio.h> 2 3 struct my_struct 4 { 5 int a; 6 int b; 7 }; 8 9 struct my_struct abc; 10 void p_ptr ( unsigned long j) 11 { 12 printf ( "%lx \n", j ); 13 } 14 15 void struct_ptr ( struct my_struct * s_ptr ) 16 { 17 printf ( "%p \n", s_ptr ); 18 } 19 20 int 21 main () 22 { 23 struct my_struct stack_abc; 24 p_ptr ((unsigned long) &abc); 25 struct_ptr ( &abc ); 26 p_ptr ((unsigned long) &stack_abc); 27 struct_ptr ( &stack_abc ); 28 return 0;...
2010 Sep 01
3
Dovecot - some more optimisations
I did some more optimisation. Most performance hit in Dovecot do "for loop" in string operations. In one case (in message-parser.c) "for loop" has another "for" inside with the same variable used as iterator. This case is very hard to optimise by compiler. I do changes only in top functions listed in oprofile. Maybe I do more in future. Code was analysed and
2011 Jul 21
10
[PATCH v5 0/8] Btrfs scrub: print path to corrupted files and trigger nodatasum fixup
While testing raid-auto-repair patches I''m going to send out later, I just found the very last bug in my current scrub patch series: Changelog v4->v5: - fixed a deadlock when fixup is taking longer while scrub is about to end Original message follows: ------------------------ This patch set introduces two new features for scrub. They share the backref iteration code which is the