Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "s9hqs6h1fxcu2lhd0zpji".
2018 Mar 13
2
[SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred
...2Flists.llvm.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fllvm-dev&data=04%7C01%7Csejooh%40microsoft.com%7Cf8d9536de7c74f3a20ce08d586141eb2%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636562343324953221%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwifQ%3D%3D%7C-2&sdata=S9HQs6h1fxCU2LhD0zPjI%2BO4BBSVgTnn6a8Cz9ji7iA%3D&reserved=0>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180313/24d8d102/attachment.html>
2018 Mar 14
0
[SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred
...2Flists.llvm.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fllvm-dev&data=04%7C01%7Csejooh%40microsoft.com%7Cf8d9536de7c74f3a20ce08d586141eb2%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636562343324953221%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwifQ%3D%3D%7C-2&sdata=S9HQs6h1fxCU2LhD0zPjI%2BO4BBSVgTnn6a8Cz9ji7iA%3D&reserved=0>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180314/b6c1cc82/attachment.html>
2018 Mar 09
0
[SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred
+ Adrian, Joshua
+ Jonas, since he contributed the transferDbgValues change in DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 5:44 PM, Se Jong Oh via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem that dbg_value nodes are not transferred when integer DAG nodes are promoted. For example, an i32 add node is promoted to a i64 add node by
2018 Mar 09
2
[SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred
Hi,
I have a problem that dbg_value nodes are not transferred when integer DAG nodes are promoted. For example, an i32 add node is promoted to a i64 add node by DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntegerResult and its dbg_value node is not transferred to the new node.
t9: i32 = add nsw t5, t8 --> t31: i64 = add t30, t7 ; the dbg_value node is not transferred to the new i64 add node.
For expansion,
2018 Mar 14
2
[SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred
...2Flists.llvm.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fllvm-dev&data=04%7C01%7Csejooh%40microsoft.com%7Cf8d9536de7c74f3a20ce08d586141eb2%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636562343324953221%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwifQ%3D%3D%7C-2&sdata=S9HQs6h1fxCU2LhD0zPjI%2BO4BBSVgTnn6a8Cz9ji7iA%3D&reserved=0>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180314/0bd9458c/attachment.html>