Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "s3lap".
Did you mean:
lap
2008 May 12
0
[LLVMdev] Size and performance figures for LLVM?
On May 12, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
>
> Am Montag, den 12.05.2008, 09:08 -0700 schrieb Devang Patel:
>> On May 12, 2008, at 2:59 AM, Pertti Kellomäki wrote:
>>
>>> 2) What is the relative performance of code generated by LLVM
>>> and gcc respectively?
>>
>> See llvm.org/nightlytest
>
> Which does not compare GCC vs. LLVM.
2008 May 12
2
[LLVMdev] Size and performance figures for LLVM?
Am Montag, den 12.05.2008, 09:08 -0700 schrieb Devang Patel:
> On May 12, 2008, at 2:59 AM, Pertti Kellomäki wrote:
>
> > 2) What is the relative performance of code generated by LLVM
> > and gcc respectively?
>
> See llvm.org/nightlytest
Which does not compare GCC vs. LLVM. (I haven't seen this announced as
the nightly tester's purpose either.)
> Many
2008 May 13
4
[LLVMdev] Size and performance figures for LLVM?
...n of
http://llvm.org/nightlytest .
I see 16 reports there. (Yesterday, I didn't count S3_AMD64 in because
it had just three results, but it seems that it is reporting on a
regular basis.)
I had tried to group machines by tester, giving me four (now five)
names: lattner, grawp, grue, laurov, and s3lap.
> What specifically
> are you looking for? If you care about a specific metric, you should
> measure it yourself.
Sorry.
I think there's some lingering frustration on my side at work. I had
tried to get the nightly tester to run, found it difficult, had
postponed it until I fi...