search for: s3fs

Hi all.. Is possible use the s3fs with ZFS (freebsd) ? how ? Thanks -- Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+ mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre http://www.mundounix.com.br ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: contato at mundounix.com.br Tel: 55 (21) 4063-7110 / 8194-1905 / (11) 4063-0407 Bl...

Hi, how can I what filer server is currently running in samba4, s3fs or ntvfs? My smb.conf looks like this: server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbind, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate, web dcerpc endpoint servers = epmapper, wkssvc, rpcecho, samr, netlogon, lsarpc, spoolss, drsuapi, dssetup, unixinfo, browser, eventlog6, backupkey, dnsserv...

We had used Samba 4 alpha 17 for a long time and want to update our server now to Samba 4.0.x. The old Samba versions was using NTVFS and Samba 4.0.x is now using S3FS by default. So, what is the best practice now? Should we stay on NTVFS or should we switch to S3FS? The global part of our smb.conf looks like this: --- [global] interfaces = eth0 netbios name = PDC passdb backend = samba4 realm = MYDOMAIN.LAN # Glo...

Hi How about calling s3fs, s4fs? Cheers, Steve

I've noticed that the samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset --use-s3fs command does not work on a ZFS filesystem on FreeBSD. It does work if sysvol is moved to a volume that is able to be mounted with the acls flag. I will reference a ticket I started with FreeNAS here: https://bugs.freenas.org/issues/4351 As of version 9.2.1.1 s3fs is now the default using the wo...

Hi, I?ve just started using Amazon S3 for storage and have used s3fs to mount the buckets on the file system. 1. I was wondering if anyone has a better method ? even though this meets my current needs. 2. if there is an automounter that could be tweaked to work with s3fs. The entries in my fstab are rather different to the normal disk based ones, s3fs#BUCKETNAM...

I have an existing install of Samba4 ( I think beta6 vintage ), which uses ntvfs and bind9. It's only providing AD and Group Policy. I have a seperate file server running 3.6.x. I want to add a server to the domain running the most recent RC. I know they are using internal by default and s3fs for the file shares on sysvol. Can s3fs coexist with ntvfs? Can the internal DNS coexist with Bind? Is there a specific reason to use the internal now? I'm happy with bind so if it's literally just a preference issue I'll probably stick with what I have. If there are good reasons...

Reading Whatsnew.txt in samba I understand that If I use s3fs, as it is set by default in the provision step, I won't be able to modify GPOs later, right? So I have a couple of questions: - What's the advantage of using s3fs over ntvfs in new installations? - If I'm planning to deploy a new Domain, probably needing to change GPOs later, should I...

...rchives, a bit of source code etc. So please correct me if I am wrong. 1. ZFS is using NFSv4 ACLs. 2. NFSv4 ACLs are modelled with NTFS (Windows) ACLs in mind. 3. Samba4 started with a new ntvfs file server but that was abandoned (or delayed?) to get samba4 released 4. Samba4 was released with s3fs as a default (the "old" Samba3 smbd) 5. s3fs is relying on POSIX ACLs which are not implemented on ZFS 6. There is a libsunacl library, a wrapper around FreeBSD ZFS NFSv4 ACLs I can install an experimental module but cannot provision AD with s3fs. 7. The provisioning with ntvfs seems...

This looka good: https://github.com/juliogonzalez/s3fs-fuse-rpm Eero 7.6.2015 4.23 ip. "Tim Dunphy" <bluethundr at gmail.com> kirjoitti: > > > > Centos 7 base repo contains fuse, use it. it works. handcompiling > packages > > to centos is *really* stupid, without proper knowledge.. > > > Thanks, you'r...

Centos 7 base repo contains fuse, use it. it works. handcompiling packages to centos is *really* stupid, without proper knowledge.. eero 2015-06-07 10:06 GMT+03:00 ????????? ???????? <nevis2us at infoline.su>: > I've tried googling this to no avail!! >> > > Have you tried The young mechanics mailing list yet? > And have a look at Gentoo Linux (http://www.gentoo.org).

Hello! I've just built my first samba4 (4.0.5) on an OpenIndiana machine without any problems. But when it comes to the provision step the problems begin. Everything is fine, if I call samba-tool with the --use-ntvfs option. But I want to use samba4 with s3fs because of the support for newer SMB protocol versions. But when I call samba-tool without --use-ntvfs option I got the following: root at openindiana:~# /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool domain provision Realm: domain.local Domain [domain]: Server Role (dc, member, standalone) [dc]: DNS bac...

Hi, I am trying to create a build on CircleCi with smaba4 AD. It seems the filesytem doesn't support ACL's, which s3fs requires. I get the folowing error: ?ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision failed - ProvisioningError: Your filesystem or build does not support posix ACLs, which s3fs requires.? Try the mounting the filesystem with the 'acl' option. ? File "/us...

...ularly for spoolss > > > but > > > also of the cifs proxy (which in turn tests kerberos delegation), > > > use > > > the ntvfs file server. > > > > OK, but how can you be sure that something you are testing against > > ntvfs actually works with s3fs ?  > > The spoolss tests are testing the (very odd) rpc call-back > functionality that requires the spoolss server to make a reverse call > to the client to deliver the notifications.  The ntvfs file server > helps provide one of the layers involved, to allow the smbtorture > pro...

...mysql database (in my setup, you can also use postgres or sqlite if you chose). Since I've started doing this I notice that the mysql data directory has swelled to over 700GB! That's quite a lot and its' easting up valuable disk space. So I had an idea. What about uses the fuse based s3fs to mount an S3 bucket on the local filesystem and use that as your mysql data dir? In other words mount your s3 bucket on /var/lib/mysql I used this article to setup the s3fs file system http://benjisimon.blogspot.com/2011/01/setting-up-s3-backup-solution-on-centos.html And everything went as pl...

Hey, I've found a bit of chatter about people using hacks to copy voicemail messages into object storage (like S3) after they've been recorded. But I was wondering if any work has been done on the VoiceMail app to actually store and retrieve messages to/from an object store? Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Ruthven, Wellington, New Zealand MIITP, ITCP At work: andrew.ruthven at catalyst.net.nz

...g interactively and > this ran up to the point where it checks if a simple ACL can be set, I > then get this: > > ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision failed - > ProvisioningError: Your filesystem or build does not support posix ACLs, > which s3fs requires. Try the mounting the filesystem with the 'acl' option. > > > > > > To provision/upgrade the domain I had to install samba43 which worked > > first time, however I had to specify --use-ntvfs to classicupgrade. I > > am unsure if this has caused any is...

RDP working configuration: restrict anonymous = 0 auth methods = sam winbind server services = winbindd, s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, cldap, ldap, kdc, drepl, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate dcerpc endpoint servers = epmapper, wkssvc, rpcecho, samr, netlogon, lsarpc, spoolss, drsuapi, dssetup, unixinfo, browser, eventlog6, backupkey, dnsserver, remote, winreg, srvsvc RDP working configuration but not the...

Hi I want all files created in a share to be group owned by a group called staff. To do this I have a share called reports which is chmod g+s staff: drwxrws---+ 9 root staff 4096 Jun 18 11:15 reports If I create a file from Linux, the sticky bit works: -rw-rw----+ 1 steve2 staff 0 Jun 18 10:57 stevelinux.txt If I create it under windows, it doesn't: -rwxrwx---+ 1 steve2 Domain

...where it > > > checks if a simple ACL can be set, I then get this: > > > > > > ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision > > > failed - ProvisioningError: Your filesystem or build does not > > > support posix ACLs, which s3fs requires. Try the mounting the > > > filesystem with the 'acl' option. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To provision/upgrade the domain I had to install samba43 which > > > > worked first time, however I had to specify --use-ntvfs t...