search for: s10u1

Hi all, I have questions about something I observed just now: 1) on AMD64, S10u1: # dtrace -n ''fbt::copystr:entry{printf ("%p\n", args[0]);}'' -c /bin/pwd dtrace: invalid probe specifier fbt::copystr:entry{printf ("%p\n", args[0]);}: in action list: index 0 is out of range for fbt::copystr:entry args[ ] but # dtrace -n ''fbt::cop...

Hi All, One of the customer is seeing the following error messages. He is using a S10U1 system with all latest patches. Dtrace script is attached. I am not seeing these error messages on S10U2 system. What could be the problem? Thanks, Gangadhar. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ rroberto at njengsunu60-2:~$ dtrace -AFs /lib/svc/share/kcfd.d...

...local nfs-s5-s8/d5201 quota 600G local bash-3.00# bash-3.00# df -h | egrep "d5201|d5110" nfs-s5-p0/d5110 600G 527G 73G 88% /nfs-s5-p0/d5110 nfs-s5-s8/d5201 600G 314G 269G 54% /nfs-s5-s8/d5201 bash-3.00# NFS client (S10U1 + patches, NFSv3 mount over TCP): bash-3.00# df -h | egrep "d5201|d5110" NFS-srv:/nfs-s5-p0/d5110 600G 527G 73G 88% /opt/d5110 NFS-srv:/nfs-s5-s8/d5201 583G 314G 269G 54% /opt/d5201 bash-3.00# Well why I get 583GB size for d5201 on NFS client? ps. maybe I'...

...attach dtrace to a process that''s being waited on by another process, and then call prun inside that dtrace script, my victim process gets a trace trap and core dumps. If I continue the same stopped process using "prun" from the command line, all is fine. Any ideas? (This is S10u1) dtrace2='' BEGIN { printf("resuming %d\n", $target); system("/bin/prun %d\n",$target); } '' dtrace -wqn "$dtrace2" -p $mypid --chris

I''m trying to set up a iscsi connection (with MPXIO) between my Vista64 workstation and a ZFS storage machine running OpenSolaris 10 (forget the exact version). On the ZFS machines, I have two NICS. NIC #1 is 192.168.1.102, and NIC #2 is 192.168.2.102. The NICs are connected to two separate switches serving two separate IP spaces. On my Vista64 machine, I also have two NICs connected in

I''m seeing some pretty pitiful performance using ZFS on a NFS server, with a ZFS volume exported (only with rw=host.foo.com,root=host.foo.com opts) and mounted on a Linux host running kernel 2.4.31. This linux kernel I''m working with is limited in that I can only do NFSv2 mounts... irregardless of that aspect, I''m sure something''s amiss. I mounted the zfs-based