search for: s0m3

...y, we got Wiki, now I can do some wicked UML diagrams for LLVM, he, he, he :) Many thanks, Aaron On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > As soon as i get out of this meeting I will > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM, someguy > <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com> wrote: >> Daniel, can you set up the virtual host please? >> >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:02 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> >> wrote: >>> John Criswell wrote: >>>> someguy wrote: >>>> >>&...

2009/3/30 someguy <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com<just.s0m3.guy%2Bllvmdev at gmail.com> > > Can you not achieve the same effect without adding intrinsics? Insert > function calls to a __spawn and __join pseudo-function instead? > It would make LLVM code generation more difficult because instead of buildi...

...M, he, he, > he > :) > > Many thanks, > > Aaron > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> > wrote: > > As soon as i get out of this meeting I will > > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM, someguy > > <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com <just.s0m3.guy%2Bllvmdev at gmail.com>> > wrote: > >> Daniel, can you set up the virtual host please? > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:02 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> > >> wrote: > >>> John...

.... This is the third question/suggestion in the last week or so where the intrinsics/pseudo-function idea has been raised. Perhaps what llvm really needs is a 'generic' pseudo-intrinsic of some kind? 2009/3/30 Milos Puzovic <milos.puzovic at gmail.com> > 2009/3/30 someguy <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com<just.s0m3.guy%2Bllvmdev at gmail.com> > > > >> Can you not achieve the same effect without adding intrinsics? Insert >> function calls to a __spawn and __join pseudo-function instead? >> > It would make LLVM code generation more difficult...

As soon as i get out of this meeting I will On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM, someguy <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com> wrote: > Daniel, can you set up the virtual host please? > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:02 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: >> John Criswell wrote: >>> someguy wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> &...

Done On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > As soon as i get out of this meeting I will > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM, someguy > <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com> wrote: >> Daniel, can you set up the virtual host please? >> >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:02 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: >>> John Criswell wrote: >>>> someguy wrote: >>>> >>>>&gt...

I'll see which plugins others use. Which wiki's pretty printing are you thinking of in particular? 2009/3/23 someguy <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com>: > Daniel, > Can we add the relevant plugins for pretty printing of source code? > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Aaron Gray > <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> >Done >> >> Yay, we got Wiki, now I can d...

Thank you. I just downloaded the binaries... Maybe I should compile it in my PC. I'll have a try. Thanks. $ file llvm-gcc llvm-gcc: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, not stripped 2009/3/16 someguy <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com>: > How did you compile LLVM? > > Can you please 'file lvm-gcc'? > > 2009/3/16 bq chan <cbqios at gmail.com>: >> Dear all, sorry to bother you. >> I am new to llvm, and have a trivial question. When I compile the >> original...

Can you not achieve the same effect without adding intrinsics? Insert function calls to a __spawn and __join pseudo-function instead? 2009/3/30 Milos Puzovic <milos.puzovic at gmail.com> > Hi Nicolas, > > 2009/3/30 Nicolas Geoffray <nicolas.geoffray at lip6.fr> > >> Can you be more verbose on this? Are you planning to implement some JVM >> or .Net extension

...thing: > > Paulo, while your working out how to do what Chris said (making usage > of bigints into library calls), wouldn't it just warm your heart to > document the process on the wiki? > > </wiki pimping> > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:16 AM, someguy > <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Oh. I see. That way the bigints don't need a representation in llvm IR... neat. >> >> Sorry for the misdirecton! >> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> &...

Hi Nicolas, 2009/3/30 Nicolas Geoffray <nicolas.geoffray at lip6.fr> > Can you be more verbose on this? Are you planning to implement some JVM > or .Net extension for supporting your new intrinsics? Or are you just > looking for a runtime with a GC? At the moment I am not looking to add any new extensions to JVM or .NET. I would need a runtime with a GC to demonstrate and test

Hi John. > I am putting this information > into my temp. wiki page in hopes of getting it into the dev wiki when > that is available. The dev wiki is up at its temporary name http://google2.osuosl.org/wiki/. Feel free to dump your stuff on there. On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:43 PM, John Mosby <ojomojo at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Evan, > Thanks very much for the review, I am

How did you compile LLVM? Can you please 'file lvm-gcc'? 2009/3/16 bq chan <cbqios at gmail.com>: > Dear all, sorry to bother you. > I am new to llvm, and have a trivial question. When I compile the > original source code to llvm-IR, there is an error as follows: > > $ llvm-gcc hello.c -o hello > /tmp/cc1vOzRT.s: Assembler messages: > /tmp/cc1vOzRT.s:9: Error:

Hi All I'm having nightmares with FrameIndexes during my backend development :( I have ComplexPatterns defined for my two addressing modes (RR and RI). Most of the time, FrameIndex operands appear to be on load/store nodes, in which case everything works fine as my custom addressing modes matchers work fine. Unfortunately, I now have an add node which has a FrameIndex operand (this results

Daniel, can you set up the virtual host please? On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:02 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > John Criswell wrote: >> someguy wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I've started outlining the notes I'd like to see on the wiki on the >>> front page (http://google2.osuosl.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page).

On Mar 24, 2009, at 11:20 PM, someguy wrote: > I could be wrong, but I think that you may need to add a 'big-integer' > intrinsic type to llvm. No, please don't. GMP is just another library like libc, your front- end should just generate calls into it like any other library. This is similar to how we handle threading and many other "language features". -Chris

Oh. I see. That way the bigints don't need a representation in llvm IR... neat. Sorry for the misdirecton! On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2009, at 11:20 PM, someguy wrote: > >> I could be wrong, but I think that you may need to add a 'big-integer' >> intrinsic type to llvm. > > No, please

John Criswell wrote: > someguy wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I've started outlining the notes I'd like to see on the wiki on the >> front page (http://google2.osuosl.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page). >> >> I'll hopefully add a bunch of those as I go along, but feel free to >> both correct my mistakes and fill in the blanks. >> >>

Dear all, sorry to bother you. I am new to llvm, and have a trivial question. When I compile the original source code to llvm-IR, there is an error as follows: $ llvm-gcc hello.c -o hello /tmp/cc1vOzRT.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/cc1vOzRT.s:9: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push' /tmp/cc1vOzRT.s:21: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop'

> > > That's not it at all. These model instructions reading / writing > MVT::Flag a value. That just mean from the scheduler's point of view > the node that produces a MVT::Flag and the user have to be scheduled > together. Wow. That's just super confusing. So SDNPInFlag/SNDPOutFlag is used only for scheduling? I think you're misunderstanding ISD::SETCC.