search for: rzync

I've released the next version of my rZync test app. You can find a link to it here: http://www.clari.net/~wayne/new-protocol.html You should also snag the referenced librsync source, as some important bugfixes in librsync are needed to compile rzync. For those that don't know, rZync is my new-protocol test app that I'm usin...

For anyone who'd like to check out the latest release of my "rzync" [sic] test release, I've just released a new version. For those that might not have time to look at the code but could provide some feedback based on a rough description, I've created the following simple web page: http://www.clari.net/~wayne/new-protocol.html Here's the ta...

...the directories were up-to-date). - Improved the "rs" control script, including the addition of the ability to specify a different destination name (previously only existing destination directories could be specified). - Added a README with the latest command syntax for controlling rzync. - Some much-needed cleanup of internal structures. - Fixed several bugs. Web resources: http://www.clari.net/~wayne/rZync-0.06.tar.gz http://www.clari.net/~wayne/new-protocol.html There are still unsquashed bugs lurking, so be careful. For instance, I tried to copy my .mozilla dir, a...

...seems to be in pretty good shape (for test code), so I figured I'd announce another release for those brave souls that may want to help me in my thinking about a (potential) new rsync protocol. It's a tar.gz file this time because I broke up the code into multiple files. I named it "rzync" just for fun (a very confusing name, no?): http://www.clari.net/~wayne/rzync.tar.gz The new stuff in this release is that it can get/put an entire directory tree of files via getd/putd, and it has conditional get/put commands that handle both files and directories (cget/cput). (For tho...

Dear List, I just googled "superlifter" and found below link, but I can't get any source code. http://superlifter.sourceforge.net/ Any help or info on this is mostly appreciated. And sorry for the trouble, if it's NOT allowed to post here. THanks. -- Daniel

Hi, I am working on a replication tool for lustre filesystems. We have introduced a mechanism for getting the changes that have been made to a lustre filesystem - similar to inotify. We call this mechanism, changelogs. For performing replication, we open the source file using its 'file identifier' or FID (think of it an inode that is unique cluster wide) instead of its path. The file is

Hey, I'm currently adding rsync to pacman (http://archlinux.org/pacman). A static version of the program is used for rescue operations. Because of this it is impossible to use the rsync client programm via an execve call and we need a version implemented in C. So I started implementing it. But the rsync source isn't beautiful or structured - it's just a big hunk of code. I spent

Hi. It seems that librsync got left by the roadside ... is there anything similar for rsync 3.x.x? Or, is there any easy way to use the library routines in the rsync 3.x.x source independantly? The only other open source software I've found that looks similar is xdelta, and it's still beta for v3.x Thanks, Sam -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

...read only= no hosts allow=10.1.2.3 list=yes uid=0 gid=0 exclude=quota.group quota.user log /usr/local/etc/rsync_logfile_data.log I'm hoping someone can advise on best practice for trying to do something like this. I've tried to get rzync going (http://www.clari.net/~wayne/new-protocol.html) but so far to no avail. It apparently tries to address some of the problems inherent in moving LARGE amounts of data. Hope I'm not talking Heresy here :-) Anyway, feedback and comments welcome. Please send them directly to me and I will po...

Hi (especially Wayne), ftp.gwdg.de is rsyncing most of the data from about 500 other rsync servers. Especially during the general "high traffic" phases like the release of a new Knoppix ISO or a new SUSE distribution or a new KDE release, I see timeouts with other servers which have maximum traffic at that time. There is a general scheme: 1. rsync is building the data base of the

Hello, The company I work for uses rsync for backups from client computers, the memory usage is a problem for a lot of them since they're already busy doing other important things (databases, web serving, etc). >From the FAQ: --- out of memory The usual reason for "out of memory" when running rsync is that you are transferring a _very_ large number of files. The size of the

I'm working on a commercial project that would benefit immensely from the use of rsync. However, I cannot convince management that rsync is a worthy tool due to the rote "it's shareware, it's not supported" FUD. Are there any documented, corportate users of rsync? Testimonials? In short, how do I drag this risk-averse group out of the FTP age into the rsync present? /p

I've been researching the state of 'file alteration monitoring' technology on Linux. Famd uses dnotify to inefficently monitor a handful of directories. The replacement for dnotify is being worked on in the kenel and it's called inotify. If I understand it correctly and they get it finished, it would be an awesome addition to rsync. With it, you could run rsync to update a

I am trying to use rsync to backup from a site we will call "office" and another we will call "home." Both sites have DSL accounts provided by Arachnet. At present the files being backed up don't all all to be backed up, but OTOH we wish to backup lots more files that aren't being backed up now. First, we create a local backup on our office machine which happens to