search for: rzycki

Thanks for your immediate reply! And I have confirmed that the LLVM source code can be compiled successfully on Debian on QEMU/X86_64. The remained is to confirm whether the LLVM source code can be compiled successfully on Debian on QEMU/aarch64.? Thanks all the same! Best 2016-11-30 21:15 GMT+08:00 David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk>: > On 30 Nov 2016, at 13:12, 李阳

Hello everyone, I am working to run the LLVM Nightly Testsuite on embedded arm devices. Not all of these devices can mount NFS to share a common directory tree. To mitigate this I have patched test-suite/RunSafely.sh (attached) to create a temporary directory, run the test remotely, collect the output, and cleanup after itself. The patch breaks compatibility with the current remote device model

Dan/Daniel/Eric, I'm testing a bare-metal ARM toolchain, and I've hacked up my local copy of lit to get it to run libcxx tests on qemu. I wanted to pick your collective brains to see if there was a better way of doing this. What I have implemented is here (don't take this as a formal review request, we can do that later once we figure out the best direction to go): lit part:

Hello, I have code containing conditions and loops. Hence some BB execution are determined at run time depending on condition. Now I want to count only those BB that are always executed irrespective of condition result means reachable. and their execution is evident at compile time. How to do this? Please help Thank You Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hello everyone, I've been having discussions with Jakub Kuderski about the merits of having routines to think more about the shape of the CFG instead of dealing with the details of the IR. I have one such patch posted and would like to know what the larger community thinks of the idea. The patch is here: <goog_558917248> https://reviews.llvm.org/D37575 This patch adds a routine

Hi folks, This summer I'm working on improving dominators during my internship at Google. Below is an RFC on switching to dynamic dominators, which you can also read as a Google Doc <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wPYeWykeO51YDPLYQEg4KNTlDIGIdyF65OTfhSMaNHQ/edit?usp=sharing> if you prefer so. Please let us know what you think. ~Kuba