Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "rxxxx".
Did you mean:
xxxx
2008 Jul 10
2
[LLVMdev] Including svn version number in --version output
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 20:13, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
> Why not set the VERSUFFIX to be " (Based on Apple Inc. build 5555) (LLVM
> rXXXX)"
Not everyone is at Apple. :)
-Dave
2008 Jul 10
0
[LLVMdev] Including svn version number in --version output
Why not set the VERSUFFIX to be " (Based on Apple Inc. build 5555) (LLVM
rXXXX)"
Where you set the revision number?
We currently use LLVM_VERSION_INFO to set this sort of information and to
me it makes more sense to have the svn rev number there instead of just
saying LLVM build like it does now.
-Tanya
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Devang Patel wrote:
> It is very usefu...
2008 Jul 10
4
[LLVMdev] Including svn version number in --version output
On Jul 9, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
>
> Why not set the VERSUFFIX to be " (Based on Apple Inc. build 5555)
> (LLVM
> rXXXX)"
>
> Where you set the revision number?
I do not want to set the revision number in a source file every time I
do 'svn update' :)
> We currently use LLVM_VERSION_INFO to set this sort of information
> and to
> me it makes more sense to have the svn rev number ther...
2008 Jul 10
4
[LLVMdev] Including svn version number in --version output
It is very useful to have svn version number encoded in llvm-gcc's --
version output. Here is one approach.
Anyone has a better patch ?
-
Devang
Index: Makefile.in
===================================================================
--- Makefile.in (revision 53385)
+++ Makefile.in (working copy)
@@ -802,6 +802,9 @@
DEVPHASE_s := "\"$(if $(DEVPHASE_c),
2008 Jul 10
0
[LLVMdev] Including svn version number in --version output
On Jul 9, 2008, at 7:16 PM, David Greene wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 July 2008 20:13, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
>> Why not set the VERSUFFIX to be " (Based on Apple Inc. build 5555)
>> (LLVM
>> rXXXX)"
>
> Not everyone is at Apple. :)
>
What is your point? You can always set LLVM_VERSION_INFO to be
whatever you want. I'm talking about the case where it isn't set. And
llvm-gcc is based on Apple gcc, so Apple will always be in the
version line.
-Tanya
>...
2002 Dec 11
1
Precisions to bug 26128
...^@0^Q^B@
@^@^@^@? ?^@^T^@^@^@^@^@^A^@"^@^@0^Q @ ^@ ^@^@? ?^@^T^@^@^@^@^@^A^@"^@^@0^Q"@ @
^@^@? ?^@^T^@^@^@^@^@^A^@"^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@? [2002/12/10 12:47:50, 0]
smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(758)
oplock_break: receive_smb error (Success)
oplock_break failed for file Pxxxxxxx/Rxxxx xx xxxx/xxxxxxx xxx.xls (dev =
812, inode = 98290, file_id = 589).
[2002/12/10 12:47:50, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(843)
oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd.
^T^@^@^@?^@^A^@ ^@^@d^@ ^@^@^@ ^@^D^V ?^@^T^@^@^@^@^@^A^@"^@^@p^@ ^@^@^@ ^@^D^V
?^@^T^@^@^@?^@^A^@ ^@^@...
2008 Jul 10
0
[LLVMdev] Including svn version number in --version output
On Jul 9, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Devang Patel wrote:
>
> On Jul 9, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
>
>>
>> Why not set the VERSUFFIX to be " (Based on Apple Inc. build 5555)
>> (LLVM
>> rXXXX)"
>>
>> Where you set the revision number?
>
> I do not want to set the revision number in a source file every time I
> do 'svn update' :)
>
Ok, so I'm confused. Don't you want the svn revision number to be
shown when you do llvm-gcc --version? So why...
2008 Jul 10
0
[LLVMdev] Including svn version number in --version output
gcc does this with contrib/gcc_update which updates the file every
update:
revision=`svn info | awk '/Revision:/ { print $2 }'`
branch=`svn info | sed -ne "/URL:/ {
s,.*/trunk,trunk,
s,.*/branches/,,
s,.*/tags/,,
p
}"`
where you now have revision and branch information.
-eric
2008 Jul 10
2
[LLVMdev] Including svn version number in --version output
...r every other commit. This should be
set by the makefile when a build is done.
On Jul 9, 2008, at 7:16 PM, David Greene wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 July 2008 20:13, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
>> Why not set the VERSUFFIX to be " (Based on Apple Inc. build 5555)
>> (LLVM
>> rXXXX)"
>
> Not everyone is at Apple. :)
I don't see what that has to do with anything here. Have you build
llvm-gcc lately? It says that for every build - it *is* based on
apple gcc.
-Chris
2001 Mar 03
1
vector argument to rnorm
Is this intended behaviour ?
> length(rnorm(c(100)))
[1] 100
> length(rnorm(c(100,0,1)))
[1] 3
> length(rnorm(length(c(100,1,2))))
[1] 3
> length(rnorm(c(100,0,1,2,3,4,5)))
[1] 7
ie if you pass in a single element vector the first element of that is
taken as the desired n (OK) , but otherwise the length of the vector
argument is taken as the desired n.
I came across this usage in
2008 Jul 10
2
[LLVMdev] Including svn version number in --version output
...7 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote:
>
> On Jul 9, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Devang Patel wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 9, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Why not set the VERSUFFIX to be " (Based on Apple Inc. build 5555)
>>> (LLVM
>>> rXXXX)"
>>>
>>> Where you set the revision number?
>>
>> I do not want to set the revision number in a source file every
>> time I
>> do 'svn update' :)
>>
>
> Ok, so I'm confused. Don't you want the svn revision number to be
&g...