Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "rwxxst".
Did you mean:
rwxt
2020 Aug 12
3
Synology NAS is shutting down Ubuntu servers after very brief power outage (fwd)
...ives no write access to the dir, and the files are covered by their
own perms, so I fail to see any relevance to your comment - sorry . . .
640 is decent for files, not so much for directories - as noted, the
fields mean different things on dirs . . .
From the man pages:
The letters rwxXst select file mode bits for the affected
users: read
(r), write (w), execute (or search for directories) (x),
execute/search
only if the file is a directory or already has execute
permission for
some user (X), set user or group ID on execution (s),
restricted dele-
So...
2020 Aug 12
0
Synology NAS is shutting down Ubuntu servers after very brief power outage (fwd)
...and the files are covered by their
> own perms, so I fail to see any relevance to your comment - sorry . . .
>
> 640 is decent for files, not so much for directories - as noted, the
> fields mean different things on dirs . . .
>
> From the man pages:
>
> The letters rwxXst select file mode bits for the affected
> users: read
> (r), write (w), execute (or search for directories) (x),
> execute/search
> only if the file is a directory or already has execute
> permission for
> some user (X), set user or group ID on execution (s),...
2020 Aug 12
3
Synology NAS is shutting down Ubuntu servers after very brief power outage (fwd)
For directory permissions, the "x" priv determines if you can access the directory, so going from 555 (r-x,r-x,r-x) to 640 (rw-,r--,---) pretty much locks out access to the dir. Myself, I'd go back to 555. 640 essentially locks the group "nut" out . . .
- Tim
On August 11, 2020 11:11:22 PM CDT, Todd Benivegna <todd at benivegna.com> wrote:
>Ok, so just a