search for: rwmk

...e DHCP server has the following ddns-rev-domainname "in-addr.arpa."; /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.named /var/lib/samba/lib/** rm, /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab r, /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf r, /var/lib/samba/private/dns/** rwk, /var/lib/samba/etc/smb.conf r, /var/tmp/** rwmk, /dev/urandown rw, # Samba4 DLZ and Active Directory Zones (default source installation) # bind support before samba 4.9 /var/lib/samba/private/dns/** rwmk, /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab r, /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf r, /var/lib/samba/private/dns/** rwk, # bind support after samba 4.9 /...

...ldb/modules/ldb/*.so rm, /var/lib/samba/bind-dns/dns.keytab rk, /var/lib/samba/bind-dns/named.conf r, /var/lib/samba/bind-dns/dns/** rwk, /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab rk, /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf r, /var/lib/samba/private/dns/** rwk, /etc/samba/smb.conf r, /dev/urandom rwmk, Then try again. Source : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=928398 Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Praveen Ghimire via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 25 juni 2019 13:43 > Aan: samb...

On 01/08/16 17:48, Jeff Sadowski wrote: > I just installed ubuntu-16.04 and followed the instructions I found for it. > problems I ran into that way > I removed apparmer and I had to use bindflatfile as dlz was not working for > me > I got my machine connected. I'll figure out fedora later. > I would figure out why dlz doesn't work first, why didn't it work ? what

...ince I suspected selinux I disabled it and rebooted but the problems where still there. The apparmor rules were as follows: Add the following apparmor rules to the end of /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.named inside the {..} sudo nano /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.named /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ldb/** rwmk, /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/** rwmk, /var/lib/samba/private/dns/** rwmk, /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf r, /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab r, /var/tmp/* rw, /dev/urandom rw, That worked well enough for me on the Ubuntu 16.04 install I did on a VM. For all I know thi...

...d but the problems where still there. > > > The apparmor rules were as follows: > > Add the following apparmor rules to the end of > /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.named inside the {..} > > sudo nano /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.named > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ldb/** rwmk, > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/** rwmk, > > /var/lib/samba/private/dns/** rwmk, > /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf r, > /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab r, > > /var/tmp/* rw, > > /dev/urandom rw, > > > That worked well enough for me o...

...is to add the following to /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.named # Samba4 DLZ and Active Directory Zones (default source installation) /usr/local/samba/lib/** rm, /usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab r, /usr/local/samba/private/named.conf r, /usr/local/samba/private/dns/** rwk, # Ubuntu /var/tmp/** rwmk, I found I needed to add an extra line for bind to start. /usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf r, Regards Fred.

> > > > *named.conf.options* > > > > options { > > > > directory "/var/cache/bind"; > > > > > > > > // If there is a firewall between you and nameservers you want > > > > // to talk to, you may need to fix the firewall to allow > > multiple > > > > // ports to talk.

Hi, We have some issue with the reverse DNS in Samba AD. We're running Bind9_DLZ on Ubuntu 18.04. The DHCP server(Ubuntu 16.04) is different to the AD server and not in the same AD domain. The DHCP scope points to the Samba AD server as the DNS server When a machine with DHCP assigned address tries to update the DNS record, it is able to update the forward zone but not the reverse zone. The

...t;/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf\";" >> /etc/bind/named.conf.local As of this part, apparmor, this might need more optimizing but this works. echo "# Samba4 DLZ and Active Directory Zones (default source installation) /var/lib/samba/lib/** rm, /var/lib/samba/private/dns/** rwmk, /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab r, /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf r, /var/lib/samba/private/dns/** rwk, /usr/lib/**/samba/bind9/** rmk, /usr/lib/**/samba/gensec/* rmk, /usr/lib/**/samba/ldb/** rmk, /usr/lib/**/ldb/modules/ldb/** rmk, /var/tmp/** rwmk," >> /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr....

...; >> > /etc/bind/named.conf.local > > > As of this part, apparmor, this might need more optimizing > but this works. > echo "# Samba4 DLZ and Active Directory Zones (default source > installation) > /var/lib/samba/lib/** rm, > /var/lib/samba/private/dns/** rwmk, > /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab r, > /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf r, > /var/lib/samba/private/dns/** rwk, > /usr/lib/**/samba/bind9/** rmk, > /usr/lib/**/samba/gensec/* rmk, > /usr/lib/**/samba/ldb/** rmk, > /usr/lib/**/ldb/modules/ldb/** rmk, > /var/tmp/** rwmk,&q...

...ib/samba/bind-dns/dns.keytab rk, /var/lib/samba/bind-dns/named.conf rw, /var/lib/samba/bind-dns/* rw, /var/lib/samba/bind-dns/dns/** rwk, /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab rk, /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf r, /var/lib/samba/private/dns/** rwk, /etc/samba/smb.conf r, /dev/urandom rwmk, owner /var/tmp/krb5_* rwk, -------------------- /etc/bind/named.conf.options (root:bind -rw-r--r--) options { directory "/var/cache/bind"; dnssec-validation no; listen-on-v6 { none; }; tkey-gssapi-keytab "var/lib/samba/bind-dns/dns.keytab"; minimal-responses yes; }; --------...

...cal > > > > > > As of this part, apparmor, this might need more optimizing > > but this works. > > echo "# Samba4 DLZ and Active Directory Zones (default source > > installation) > > /var/lib/samba/lib/** rm, > > /var/lib/samba/private/dns/** rwmk, > > /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab r, > > /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf r, > > /var/lib/samba/private/dns/** rwk, > > /usr/lib/**/samba/bind9/** rmk, > > /usr/lib/**/samba/gensec/* rmk, > > /usr/lib/**/samba/ldb/** rmk, > > /usr/lib/**/ldb/modules/l...

Ah, ok, my thats where its different here. My setup is AD-DNS => eth0 Server_split_DNS (Proxy) eth1 => internet > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Joachim Lindenberg [mailto:samba at lindenberg.one] > Verzonden: dinsdag 30 juli 2019 10:44 > Aan: 'L.P.H. van Belle'; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: AW: [Samba] split horizon and authoritative answers..?

Hello I'm trying to move to Bind from internal DNS. Internal DNS sometimes does not answer for clients with forwarded from another one records. It serves only local addreses when there is high traffic. When i start bind is see some errors: ----------------------------------- Apr 25 13:50:35 PrimaryDC named[7726]: sizing zone task pool based on 5 zones Apr 25 13:50:35 PrimaryDC

...r.sbin.named ========================================= # Samba4 DLZ and Active Directory Zones (default source installation) /var/lib/samba/lib/** rm, /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab r, /var/lib/samba/private/ rw, /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf r, /var/lib/samba/private/dns/** rwk, /var/tmp/** rwmk, } ========================================= output of samba_dnsupdate ========================================= oot at samba-ad:/etc/apparmor.d# samba_dnsupdate --verbose IPs: ['10.0.2.4'] Looking for DNS entry A samba-ad.heathfam.com 10.0.2.4 as samba-ad.heathfam.com. Looking for DNS e...

...ile confined? The option was to purge and reinstall apparmor. The following is the /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.named /var/lib/samba/lib/** rm, /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab r, /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf r, /var/lib/samba/private/dns/** rwk, /var/lib/samba/etc/smb.conf r, /var/tmp/** rwmk, /dev/urandown rw, The following from syslog Jun 21 12:52:11 server5-ad ntpd[174]: adj_systime: Operation not permitted Jun 21 12:52:38 server5-ad ntpd[174]: message repeated 27 times: [ adj_systime: Operation not permitted] Jun 21 12:52:38 server5-ad samba[201]: dnsserver: Invalid zone operati...