search for: rwhite

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1125 Bug ID: 1125 Summary: Setting bit mark according to result of lookup Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1057 Bug ID: 1057 Summary: Allow for multiple protocols to be specified in a rule Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

...g to handle a read-write round-trip well, I think. > > So my personal don't-really-have-a-hat-in-the-ring opinion would be to > either leave it as is, or force as.Date(Inf, bla) to actually be NA. > > Best, > ~G > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 12:06 PM Richard White <w at rwhite.no > <mailto:w at rwhite.no>> wrote: > > Hi, > > I think I've discovered a bug in base R. > > Basically, when using 'Inf' as as 'Date', is is visually displayed as > 'NA', but R still treats it as 'Inf'. So it is...

Hi, I think I've discovered a bug in base R. Basically, when using 'Inf' as as 'Date', is is visually displayed as 'NA', but R still treats it as 'Inf'. So it is very confusing to work with, and can easily lead to errors: # Visually displays as NA > as.Date(Inf, origin="2018-01-01") [1] NA # Visually displays as NA > str(as.Date(Inf,

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 9:54 PM Richard White <w at rwhite.no> wrote: > Hi Gabriel, > > The point is that it *visually* displays as NA, but is.na() still > responds as FALSE. > > When I (and I am sure many people) see an NA, we then use is.na(). If we > see Inf displayed, we then use is.infinite(). With as.Date() this breaks > d...

>>>>> Gabriel Becker >>>>> on Tue, 5 Mar 2019 22:01:37 -0800 writes: > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 9:54 PM Richard White <w at rwhite.no> wrote: >> Hi Gabriel, >> >> The point is that it *visually* displays as NA, but is.na() still >> responds as FALSE. >> >> When I (and I am sure many people) see an NA, we then use is.na(). If we >> see Inf displayed, we...

...to change the x-axis? Also, I would prefer the y-axis to be represented by percentages (10, 20, 30..) rather than decimals (.10, .20, .30...). I can change the labels, but again I get the error, is there another way to solve the problem? Thanks! ************** CODE ********************* plot (Rwhite.surv, main = "SNP Model", ylab = "Events", xlab = "Days to Event", fun="event", col = c("red", "blue", "black"), lty = c(1, 2, 3), xaxt="n", axis(1, at=seq (0, 183, 365, 549, 732, 915, 1095)) ) legend ("bottomrig...

...hen no entry matches. Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: kernel Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org Reporter: rwhite at pobox.com It would be extremely helpful if the various look-up cases had the option of including a default value or verdict to return or execute (respectively) when no entry matches. This doesn't really make sense for plain sets where membership is what's being tested, but for the bran...

...ues for address and port Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org Reporter: rwhite at pobox.com If the result value of a map is ipv[46]_addr . inet_service then a dnat or snat directive should understand that these are the address and port values for statement. so... table example { dnat_info { type inet_service : ipv4_addr . inet_service elements = { 80 : 192....

...unique... Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: kernel Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org Reporter: rwhite at pobox.com So this doesn't rate a bug, but it did confuse me. Flow tables are always named, but they don't conform to the way sets, maps, and dictionaries work in terms of "add" and "delete" and all that. They are also "flow tables" instead of one word lik...

...t;Inf". Neither of those are going to handle a read-write round-trip well, I think. So my personal don't-really-have-a-hat-in-the-ring opinion would be to either leave it as is, or force as.Date(Inf, bla) to actually be NA. Best, ~G On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 12:06 PM Richard White <w at rwhite.no> wrote: > Hi, > > I think I've discovered a bug in base R. > > Basically, when using 'Inf' as as 'Date', is is visually displayed as > 'NA', but R still treats it as 'Inf'. So it is very confusing to work > with, and can easily lead to...

...evaluation Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: kernel Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org Reporter: rwhite at pobox.com In the following example the counters should both equal at least 2 but the one predicated on the add is zero. ASIDE: In my humble opinion the target2 set should be empty, as update shouldn't add elements, only update them if they are present; but the notation in the wiki regardin...