Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "rvkrsx".
2020 May 29
2
Range lists, zero-length functions, linker gc
...(doing it in other sections could break )
> > >> > 3) Revisit the discussion about using an even more 'blessed' value,
> > >>
> > >> > like int max-1? (
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://reviews.llvm.org/D59553__;!!JmoZiZGBv3
> > RvKRSx!sRjL4Vdx9oC8TPFhKZ-QbL7LtpIL-1Zdb4OydT2xVhpDTRyUixtaozLYiewZqMLtoA$
> > >>
> > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/reviews.llvm.org/D59553__;!!JmoZiZGBv3
> > RvKRSx!r2Jqc2yEgxrb2QcQEocDHJBizj0KUKE70_57b4_rsj1TN0qB8NpBvVKtY63HSqgMOg$
> > >
> > >> )
&g...
2020 May 29
2
Range lists, zero-length functions, linker gc
...t; > > R_X86_64_64 relocations in .debug_ranges are resolved to 1, ignoring
> > the
> > > > addend
> > > >
> > > > (Behavior introduced in
> > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-
> > __;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!tvZHOB67bddZqG6U17Cj0X1rfKGW72rrjmKKFQNBxBlQvgdukM5e
> > 3DkTDxuwRVwsyw$
> > > >
> > gdb.git;a=blobdiff;f=bfd*ChangeLog;h=8fbaed21fa2c8238459acb637545583f3cfbb
> > > >
> > fdf;hp=18a3a67be3a5980998c4461b5a739e54f3551b17;hb=e4067dbb2a3368dbf908b39
> >...
2020 May 29
4
Range lists, zero-length functions, linker gc
...ctions? (doing it in other sections could break )
>> > 3) Revisit the discussion about using an even more 'blessed' value,
>>
>> > like int max-1? ( https://reviews.llvm.org/D59553
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/reviews.llvm.org/D59553__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!r2Jqc2yEgxrb2QcQEocDHJBizj0KUKE70_57b4_rsj1TN0qB8NpBvVKtY63HSqgMOg$>
>> )
>>
>> > (I don't have links to all the recent threads about this discussion - I
>> think D59553
>>
>> > might've spawned a separate broader discussion/non-review - oh, Al...
2020 May 31
2
Range lists, zero-length functions, linker gc
...are resolved to 1, ignoring
> >> > the
> >> > > > addend
> >> > > >
> >> > > > (Behavior introduced in
> >> > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-
> >> > __;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!tvZHOB67bddZqG6U17Cj0X1rfKGW72rrjmKKFQNBxBlQvgdukM5e
> >> > 3DkTDxuwRVwsyw$
> >> > > >
> >> > gdb.git;a=blobdiff;f=bfd*ChangeLog;h=8fbaed21fa2c8238459acb637545583f3cfbb
> >> > > >
> >> > fdf;hp=18a3a67be3a5980998c4461b5a739e54f...
2020 May 31
3
Range lists, zero-length functions, linker gc
...; the
> >> >> > > > addend
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > (Behavior introduced in
> >> >> > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-
> >> >> > __;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!tvZHOB67bddZqG6U17Cj0X1rfKGW72rrjmKKFQNBxBlQvgdukM5e
> >> >> > 3DkTDxuwRVwsyw$
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > gdb.git;a=blobdiff;f=bfd*ChangeLog;h=8fbaed21fa2c8238459acb637545583f3cfbb
> >> >> > > >
> >> >>...
2020 Nov 11
0
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...4 enabled one can still encounter relocation overflows errors in LLD
> if DWARF32 sections happen to be processed towards the end.
> >> >>
> >> >> One proposal that was discussed in
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://reviews.llvm.org/D87011__;!!JmoZiZGBv3
> RvKRSx!pnSYzjQly_yuEU-ng7OYd8nr3h3tSYOjeCwnH7cr3hA73rA8aVlNzOfQPo9Ue7WdoQ$
> , is to modify LLD linker to arrange debug_info sections so that DWARF32
> comes first, and DWARF64 after them. This way as long as DWARF32 sections
> don't themselves go over 4gigs, the final binary can contain debu...
2020 Nov 11
3
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 12:55 AM James Henderson
<jh7370.2008 at my.bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 05:41, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +James for context too (always good to include the folks from the
>> original threads for continuity)
>>
>> Yeah, my general attitude there was just twofold, one that
2020 Nov 11
3
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...ill encounter relocation overflows errors in LLD
>> if DWARF32 sections happen to be processed towards the end.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> One proposal that was discussed in
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://reviews.llvm.org/D87011__;!!JmoZiZGBv3
>> RvKRSx!pnSYzjQly_yuEU-ng7OYd8nr3h3tSYOjeCwnH7cr3hA73rA8aVlNzOfQPo9Ue7WdoQ$
>> , is to modify LLD linker to arrange debug_info sections so that DWARF32
>> comes first, and DWARF64 after them. This way as long as DWARF32 sections
>> don't themselves go over 4gigs, the final binary can...
2020 Nov 12
0
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...en with
>> DWARF64 enabled one can still encounter relocation overflows errors in LLD
>> if DWARF32 sections happen to be processed towards the end.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> One proposal that was discussed in
>> https://reviews.llvm.org/D87011
>> RvKRSx!pnSYzjQly_yuEU-ng7OYd8nr3h3tSYOjeCwnH7cr3hA73rA8aVlNzOfQPo9Ue7WdoQ$
>> , is to modify LLD linker to arrange debug_info sections so that DWARF32
>> comes first, and DWARF64 after them. This way as long as DWARF32 sections
>> don't themselves go over 4gigs, the final binary can...