search for: rutine

Full_Name: Prokaj Vilmos Version: R 2-4-0 OS: Windows Submission from: (NULL) (193.224.79.8) PackBits(rbinom(32,1,0.5)==1,"integer") does not work. z<-packBits(rbinom(32,1,.5)==1,"integer") Error in packBits(x, type) : argument 'x' must be raw, integer or logical Taking a closer look at the C code main/character.c do_packBits rutin one can find the following

rutine -> routine Also MSVC complains that FLAC__uint32* (unsigned int*) is not of the same type as unsigned long* --- a\src\libFLAC\include\private\bitmath.h 2013-08-13 13:30:24.000000000 +0400 +++ b\src\libFLAC\include\private\bitmath.h 2013-08-14 10:20:51.484053700 +0400 @@ -78,12 +78,12 @@ r...

...of length 5000 whose components are (mostly) "ts" objects, but some these components are intentionally left empty, ie, they are "NULL" components of the list. My question is how can I get the position of these null components in a effective way (I'm trying to avoid a for-if rutine). Thanks!!! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R-folks: I have a group of data ('x' and 'y' axis), but I'd like to know how to draw a graph which would fits my data in a better way, I also need its equation. Could you give me any R-rutine ideas?. I thank you in advance for your kind support. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I have asked this question earlier, but did not receive an answer.... I'm trying to build 3.2.3a on a RedHat 7.2, but during configuring I get an error: #### ./configure .... .... .... checking for test rutines... configure: error: cant find test code. Aborting config #### Does any one have any clue about what is going wrong???? Regards/Casper

...50 at gmail.com> wrote: > 1) I thought of taking the gcc compiler and compiling it with llvm since it > is easier to make test cases to test the system. Is gcc compiler already > built with llvm? if so I have the linux kernel as the second option. What is > your openion on this ? We rutinely compile linux with llvm (and do LTO and custom transforms on it). So that would be novel. However, several existing optimizations break the linux kernel (and several bits of the linux kernel are buggy and just happen to work with gcc (aka their correctness depends on getting a pseudo random val...

...The legacy owner group's permissions are correct because of the security mask of smb.conf, but I couldn't find a security mask which is valid for the extended permissions. As I read about it on the net, the base of the problem is that Linux's touch command and the samba file creation rutine use different mode(?)/umask(?) to create a new file. How can I change them? I read the archive and the whole Google but I couldn't find a way how to solve this problem however sombody elses also wrote about this issue. :-) Please help me and please forgive me if I only missconfigured my sy...

...n _bit_scan_reverse(n) ^ 31U; + return _bit_scan_reverse(v) ^ 31U; #elif defined(__GNUC__) && (__GNUC__ >= 4 || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4)) /* This will translate either to (bsr ^ 31U), clz , ctlz, cntlz, lzcnt depending on * -march= setting or to a software rutine in exotic machines. */ -- 1.7.10.4 --=_vA9B0g0mKp5QbmIrcmD4lw5 Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii; name=0002-bitwriter.c-Add-missing-extern-declaration.patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0002-bitwriter.c-Add-missing-extern-declaration.patch; size=1091

Hello R-experts, I want to ask I anyone knows a way to obtain a suitable value for the parameter of the box-cox transformation for time series (aiming to an Arima fit). Adittionally, I need to implement this to a list with a lot of series (about 5300), so if the method is suitable for an FOR-rutine will be excellent thanks [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...per Pedersen wrote: >Hi, > >I have asked this question earlier, but did not receive an answer.... > >I'm trying to build 3.2.3a on a RedHat 7.2, but during configuring I get >an error: > >#### >./configure >.... >.... >.... >checking for test rutines... configure: error: cant find test code. >Aborting config >#### > >Does any one have any clue about what is going wrong???? > >Regards/Casper > > >

I'm preparing some code to compute the optimal geometry of stressed solids. The core of the calculations is the optimization of elastic energy using the simulated annealing method implemented in the R optim() rutine. I've defined a function to compute this "energy" scalar (the fn parameter for optim) and prepared a list with the arrays defining the geometry and the elastic properties of the solid (par parameter to optim). Finally, I tried to write my "gr" function to compute new random...

Dear List-Members, since 3 weeks I have been heavily working on reproducing the results of an economic paper. The method there uses the numerical solution of an integral within nonlinear least squares. Within the integrand there is also some parameter to estimate. Is that in the end possible to implement in R [Originally it was done in GAUSS]? I'm nearly into giving up. I constucted an

hi, Several doubts aroused after I read through all the information provided in former mails. They are > > >> > > I think this would be a great project. However, I would rephrase it > > to be more concrete. > > > > How about taking a linux distro like redhat or gentoo or whatever you > > are familiar of comfortable with, and try compiling the whole

...#if defined(__INTEL_COMPILER) + return _bit_scan_reverse(n) ^ 31U; +#elif defined(__GNUC__) && (__GNUC__ >= 4 || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4)) +/* This will translate either to (bsr ^ 31U), clz , ctlz, cntlz, lzcnt depending on + * -march= setting or to a software rutine in exotic machines. */ + return __builtin_clz(v); +#elif defined(_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER >= 1400) + FLAC__uint32 idx; + _BitScanReverse(&idx, v); + return idx ^ 31U; +#else + return FLAC__clz_soft_uint32(v); +#endif +} + +/* An example of what FLAC__bitmath_ilog2() comp...

...n _bit_scan_reverse(n) ^ 31U; + return _bit_scan_reverse(v) ^ 31U; #elif defined(__GNUC__) && (__GNUC__ >= 4 || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4)) /* This will translate either to (bsr ^ 31U), clz , ctlz, cntlz, lzcnt depending on * -march= setting or to a software rutine in exotic machines. */ -------------- next part -------------- diff -Naur flac-1.3.0pre4/src/libFLAC/stream_decoder.c flac-1.3.0pre4-patched/src/libFLAC/stream_decoder.c --- flac-1.3.0pre4/src/libFLAC/stream_decoder.c 2013-04-07 11:02:38 +0000 +++ flac-1.3.0pre4-patched/src/libFLAC/stream_decoder.c...

Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Mar 29, 2008, at 11:53 PM, Kumaripaba Miyurusara Atukorala wrote: > >> hi, >> This e-mail is written to involve some of the project ideas in LLVM >> in GSOC this year. >> I was looking in to the ideas mentioned under improving current >> system and found the idea of "Compile programs with the LLVM >> Compiler" to be

...afe_stack_guard); + + // Make sure out thread-specific destructor will be called + // FIXME: we can do this only any other specific key is set by + // intersepting the pthread_setspecific function itself + __d_pthread_setspecific(thread_cleanup_key, (void*) 1); + + // Start the original thread rutine + return start_routine(start_routine_arg); +} + +/// Intercept thread creation operation to allocate and setup the unsafe stack +INTERCEPTOR(int, pthread_create, pthread_t *thread, + const pthread_attr_t *attr, + void *(*start_routine)(void*), void *arg) { + + size_t size =...