search for: russianfedora

Please tell me your opinion. How legal is to use, redistribute, include in installation cds, repos etc, rpms/srpms like this: http://pull-mirror.yandex.net/fedora/russianfedora/russianfedora/nonfree/fedora/updates/19/SRPMS/chromium-pepper-flash-13.0.0.206-1.fc19.R.src.rpm -- View this message in context: http://centos.1050465.n5.nabble.com/Is-it-legal-tp5726659.html Sent from the CentOS mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

....rpm https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSM1ByMUNMaWNVYmM/edit?usp=sharing chromium-34.0.1847.132-4.el6.src.rpm https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSNk05U0tlYU1DR1k/edit?usp=sharing It works with latest flash taken from chrome (non-free) e.g. http://pull-mirror.yandex.net/fedora/russianfedora/russianfedora/nonfree/fedora/updates/19/SRPMS/ -- View this message in context: http://centos.1050465.n5.nabble.com/CentOS-chromium-34-0-1847-132-4-el6-tp5726761.html Sent from the CentOS mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

I have installed Skype 4.0.0.8 on my new workstation running CentOS-6.3 (kvm) and the Gnome DTM. This host has an Intel DG43GT motherboard with on-board audio. The sound works when tested in the sound preferences in the desk top. Skype runs and the integrated usb video and microphone both work (I infer this from the mic test in Skype options showing movement on the intensity bar as I can hear