search for: runtimedyldelfbecause

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "runtimedyldelfbecause".

2015 May 22
2
[LLVMdev] Sporadic "RealOffset <= INT32_MAX && RealOffset >= INT32_MIN" failures with MCJIT on Windows
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Keno Fischer <kfischer at college.harvard.edu> wrote: > This might be related to GOT relocations. I rewrote that part of > RuntimeDyldELFbecause I was seeing this issue. Have you tried trunk? > I didn't notice that you were running 3.5 the first time I read this. Keno's diagnosis is very likely to be correct. You should try trunk if you're able to. - Lang. On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Keno Fischer <kfischer at colle...
2015 May 23
2
[LLVMdev] Sporadic "RealOffset <= INT32_MAX && RealOffset >= INT32_MIN" failures with MCJIT on Windows
...<= INT32_MAX && RealOffset > >= INT32_MIN" failures with MCJIT on Windows > > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Keno Fischer < > kfischer at college.harvard.edu> wrote: > >> This might be related to GOT relocations. I rewrote that part of >> RuntimeDyldELFbecause I was seeing this issue. Have you tried trunk? >> > > I didn't notice that you were running 3.5 the first time I read this. > Keno's diagnosis is very likely to be correct. You should try trunk if > you're able to. > > - Lang. > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at...
2015 May 22
2
[LLVMdev] Sporadic "RealOffset <= INT32_MAX && RealOffset >= INT32_MIN" failures with MCJIT on Windows
So it appears that we get about half the crashes with the large code model. The rest are crashing in the same way. It could either mean that large code model still takes that crashing codepath and that the number of crashes only went down by chance, or that in one place in the flow, large code model is not matched to mean ELF::R_X86_64_PC64. I'm digging into this issue further, but any hints