search for: runpn

Thanks for sharing your take on this. (Sorry about likely mixing historic standards, was not in position to cross-check while posting) Just to clarify: using a different port *is* possible since forever, with `LISTEN host port` (as two arguments to the directive); the question was if having a way to spell it as one argument as `LISTEN host:port` would solve some shortcomings/ease adoption more

Thanks for sharing your take on this. (Sorry about likely mixing historic standards, was not in position to cross-check while posting) Just to clarify: using a different port *is* possible since forever, with `LISTEN host port` (as two arguments to the directive); the question was if having a way to spell it as one argument as `LISTEN host:port` would solve some shortcomings/ease adoption more