search for: runpasses

The virtual function Pass::runPass is a little deceptive; a pass that isn't a ModulePass can be run on a Module when run from a PassManager, but calling runPass(Module *) with the same pass does nothing. Also, runPass doesn't appear to be used anywhere. Can someone explain what runPass is for? Thanks, Dan

On Mar 7, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > > On Mar 7, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: > >> The virtual function Pass::runPass is a little deceptive; a pass that >> isn't a ModulePass can be run on a Module when run from a >> PassManager, but calling runPass(Module *) with the same pass >> does nothing. Also, runPass doesn't appear to be used

On Mar 7, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: > The virtual function Pass::runPass is a little deceptive; a pass that > isn't a ModulePass can be run on a Module when run from a > PassManager, but calling runPass(Module *) with the same pass > does nothing. Also, runPass doesn't appear to be used anywhere. > Can someone explain what runPass is for? Only BasicBlockPass

...:Emitter::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&)+0x115)[0x866a859] llc(llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)+0x29)[0x85f3421] llc(llvm::FunctionPassManagerT::runPass(llvm::FunctionPass*, llvm::Function*)+0x1f)[0x89e39b5] llc(llvm::PassManagerT<llvm::FTraits>::runPasses(llvm::Function*, std::map<llvm::Pass*, std::vector<llvm::Pass*, std::allocator<llvm::Pass*> >, std::less<llvm::Pass*>, std::allocator<std::pair<llvm::Pass* const, std::vector<llvm::Pass*, std::allocator<llvm::Pass*> > > > >&)+0x13f)[0x89e52b7] llc...

...amespace)::SignalHandler(int)+0x107)[0x88cfcc1] /lib/tls/libc.so.6[0x239f48] llc(llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)+0x28)[0x8400638] llc(llvm::FunctionPassManagerT::runPass(llvm::FunctionPass*, llvm::Function*)+0x1b)[0x8857349] llc(llvm::PassManagerT<llvm::FTraits>::runPasses(llvm::Function*, std::map<llvm::Pass*, std::vector<llvm::Pass*, std::allocator<llvm::Pass*> >, std::less<llvm::Pass*>, std::allocator<std::pair<llvm::Pass* const, std::vector<llvm::Pass*, std::allocator<llvm::Pass*> > > > >&)+0x11c)[0x8858bca] llc...

...int)+0x107)[0x88cfcc1] > /lib/tls/libc.so.6[0x239f48] > llc(llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)+0x28)[0x8400638] > llc(llvm::FunctionPassManagerT::runPass(llvm::FunctionPass*, > llvm::Function*)+0x1b)[0x8857349] > llc(llvm::PassManagerT<llvm::FTraits>::runPasses(llvm::Function*, > std::map<llvm::Pass*, std::vector<llvm::Pass*, std::allocator<llvm::Pass*> >> , std::less<llvm::Pass*>, std::allocator<std::pair<llvm::Pass* const, > std::vector<llvm::Pass*, std::allocator<llvm::Pass*> > > > >> &)+0...

...t; > /lib/tls/libc.so.6[0x239f48] > > llc(llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)+0x28)[0x8400638] > > llc(llvm::FunctionPassManagerT::runPass(llvm::FunctionPass*, > > llvm::Function*)+0x1b)[0x8857349] > > llc(llvm::PassManagerT<llvm::FTraits>::runPasses(llvm::Function*, > > std::map<llvm::Pass*, std::vector<llvm::Pass*, std::allocator<llvm::Pass*> > >> , std::less<llvm::Pass*>, std::allocator<std::pair<llvm::Pass* const, > > std::vector<llvm::Pass*, std::allocator<llvm::Pass*> > > > &g...

On Apr 12, 2006, at 10:23 PM, Simon Burton wrote: > > Is it possible to get llvm to generate native machine code > without using gcc and friends ? Do I use lli ? llc. llc --help lists all the options. it compiles llvm bytecode files. > > I'd like to directly create executable code that i can > stick in memory somewhere and jump into (call). > > (I'm looking

Hi, I have been trying to randomize blocks in a program and modified "BasicBlockPlacement.cpp" for the purpose but getting segmentation fault.I am not able to determine the problem.Can anyone please decrypt these error messages or suggest what might be the possible cause of failure? -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The various intrinsic assert/crashes should all be fixed on mainline CVS (they are PR733, which I just fixed). The only ones that I'm wary of are: XPASS: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2004-02-20- StaticRedeclare.c.tr FAIL: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2005-12-04- DeclarationLineNumbers.c: In the former case, I would guess that the test isn't

Thanks John, this is an easy way to achieve this goal, but I'm wondering if this is the only way? I have around 100 passes. Quoting John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>: > On 6/28/11 11:35 PM, kecheng at cecs.pdx.edu wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Llvm can automatically group a list passes. I want to do some >> experiment to see the difference between grouping

On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > I have been trying to randomize blocks in a program and modified > "BasicBlockPlacement.cpp" for the purpose but getting segmentation > fault.I am not able to determine the problem.Can anyone please decrypt > these error messages or suggest what might be the possible cause of > failure? I'd be happy to fix this, but I need

I just updated again (both llvm and llvm-gcc). The only thing that changed was: P test/Regression/CFrontend/2005-12-04-DeclarationLineNumbers.c The regression test below was done *with* your llvm-gcc changes to llvm- expand.c. I don't know what the failures are all about, but I will try it again. If its the same, I'll let you know. Reid. On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 16:20 -0500, Chris Lattner

Sorry in advance for the stupid question, i still don’t understand some concepts like passes. I took a piece of code from llc, and I used it to write a function that creates an object (or assembly) file from an IR module. It compiles without any problems. But program crashes when it reaches add() method of the pass manager. Can you help me figuring out what’s the problem please? here is my

...Node*, std::allocator<llvm::CallGraphNode*> > const&)+0x6e)[0x838cefe] gccld(llvm::CallGraphSCCPass::runOnModule(llvm::Module&)+0x84)[0x83c430a] gccld(llvm::ModulePassManager::runPass(llvm::ModulePass*, llvm::Module*)+0x1f)[0 x84761ef] gccld(llvm::PassManagerT<llvm::MTraits>::runPasses(llvm::Module*, std::map<llvm: :Pass*, std::vector<llvm::Pass*, std::allocator<llvm::Pass*> >, std::less<llvm:: Pass*>, std::allocator<std::pair<llvm::Pass* const, std::vector<llvm::Pass*, std ::allocator<llvm::Pass*> > > > >&)+0x12a)[0x8488a10] gc...

Is it possible to get llvm to generate native machine code without using gcc and friends ? Do I use lli ? I'd like to directly create executable code that i can stick in memory somewhere and jump into (call). (I'm looking to use llvm in a BSD licensed project). Simon. -- Simon Burton, B.Sc. Licensed PO Box 8066 ANU Canberra 2601 Australia Ph. 61 02 6249 6940 http://arrowtheory.com

>> Is attached patch acceptable? > > Looks great, applied, thanks! > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20050131/023931.html Thanks! >> Also I have in Makefile.rules (but not include in patch) some >> modification for simplify used common Makefile.rules in LLVM projects and >> non-LLVM project (guarding some LLVM specific parts by ifdef

...AGISel::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)+0x25)[0x84ea18b] /home/snir/jingyu/resources/llvm/build2/Debug/bin/llc(llvm::FunctionPassManagerT::runPass(llvm::FunctionPass*, llvm::Function*)+0x1f)[0x86e004b] /home/snir/jingyu/resources/llvm/build2/Debug/bin/llc(llvm::PassManagerT<llvm::FTraits>::runPasses(llvm::Function*, std::map<llvm::Pass*, std::vector<llvm::Pass*, std::allocator<llvm::Pass*> >, std::less<llvm::Pass*>, std::allocator<std::pair<llvm::Pass* const, std::vector<llvm::Pass*, std::allocator<llvm::Pass*> > > > >&)+0x13e)[0x86de7e0] /ho...

...::CallGraphNode*> > const&)+0x76)[0x8347804]<br> gccld(llvm::CallGraphSCCPass::runOnModule(llvm::Module&)+0x99)[0x8378e29]<br> gccld(llvm::ModulePassManager::runPass(llvm::ModulePass*, llvm::Module*)+0x1b)[0x842a111]<br> gccld(llvm::PassManagerT<llvm::MTraits>::runPasses(llvm::Module*, std::map<llvm::Pass*, std::vector<llvm::Pass*, std::allocator<llvm::Pass*> >, std::less<llvm::Pass*>, std::allocator<std::pair<llvm::Pass* const, std::vector<llvm::Pass*, std::allocator<llvm::Pass*> > > > >&)+0x11c)[0x8429098]<br...

Here's what's left on Linux (GCC 4.1.0), after all updates that went into the branch: Running /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/dg.exp ... FAIL: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2004-02-12- LargeAggregateCopy.c.tr: gccas: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/lib/VMCore/Function.cpp:266: unsigned int llvm::Function::getIntrinsicID() const: Assertion `0 &&