search for: runl

smatch reports drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/runl.c:33:18: warning: symbol 'nvkm_engn_cgrp_get' was not declared. Should it be static? nvkm_engn_cgrp_get is only used in runl.c, so it should be static Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/runl.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 inserti...

This is an initial series of patches to improve channel recovery on Turing GPUs with the goal of improving reliability enough to eventually enable SVM for Turing. It's likely follow up patches will be required to fully address problems with less trivial workloads than what I have been able to test thus far. This series primarily addresses a number of hardware changes to interrupt layout and

...> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c index 3a24788c3185..a7e55c422501 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ gk104_fifo_runlist_commit(struct gk104_fifo *fifo, int runl) case NVKM_MEM_TARGET_NCOH: target = 3; break; default: WARN_ON(1); - return; + goto unlock; } nvkm_wr32(device, 0x002270, (nvkm_memory_addr(mem) >> 12) | @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ gk104_fifo_runlist_commit(struct gk104_fifo *fifo, int runl...

...NV_DEVICE_HOST_CHANNELS: *data = fifo->chid ? fifo->chid->nr : 0; return 0; + case NV_DEVICE_HOST_CHANNELS: + if (fifo->func->chid_total) + *data = fifo->func->chid_total(fifo); + else + *data = fifo->chid ? fifo->chid->nr : 0; + return 0; case NV_DEVICE_HOST_RUNLISTS: *data = 0; nvkm_runl_foreach(runl, fifo) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/priv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/priv.h index a0f3277605a5..c21e982b03a5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/priv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/...

...NE_MSVLD: + ptr0 = 0x0270; + break; + case NVKM_ENGINE_VIC: + ptr0 = 0x0280; break; + case NVKM_ENGINE_MSENC: + ptr0 = 0x0290; + break; + case NVKM_ENGINE_NVDEC: ptr1 = 0x0270; ptr0 = 0x0210; break; @@ -435,8 +449,12 @@ gk104_runl_commit(struct nvkm_runl *runl, struct nvkm_memory *memory, u32 start, int target; switch (nvkm_memory_target(memory)) { - case NVKM_MEM_TARGET_VRAM: target = 0; break; - case NVKM_MEM_TARGET_NCOH: target = 3; break; + case NVKM_MEM_TARGET_VRAM: + target = 0; + b...

...NE_MSVLD: + ptr0 = 0x0270; + break; + case NVKM_ENGINE_VIC: + ptr0 = 0x0280; break; + case NVKM_ENGINE_MSENC: + ptr0 = 0x0290; + break; + case NVKM_ENGINE_NVDEC: ptr1 = 0x0270; ptr0 = 0x0210; break; @@ -435,8 +449,12 @@ gk104_runl_commit(struct nvkm_runl *runl, struct nvkm_memory *memory, u32 start, int target; switch (nvkm_memory_target(memory)) { - case NVKM_MEM_TARGET_VRAM: target = 0; break; - case NVKM_MEM_TARGET_NCOH: target = 3; break; + case NVKM_MEM_TARGET_VRAM: + target = 0; + b...

...> + case NVKM_ENGINE_VIC: > + ptr0 = 0x0280; break; > + case NVKM_ENGINE_MSENC: > + ptr0 = 0x0290; > + break; > + case NVKM_ENGINE_NVDEC: > ptr1 = 0x0270; > ptr0 = 0x0210; > break; > @@ -435,8 +449,12 @@ gk104_runl_commit(struct nvkm_runl *runl, struct > nvkm_memory *memory, u32 start, > int target; > > switch (nvkm_memory_target(memory)) { > - case NVKM_MEM_TARGET_VRAM: target = 0; break; > - case NVKM_MEM_TARGET_NCOH: target = 3; break; > + case NVKM_MEM_TARGET_VR...

...> + case NVKM_ENGINE_VIC: > + ptr0 = 0x0280; break; > + case NVKM_ENGINE_MSENC: > + ptr0 = 0x0290; > + break; > + case NVKM_ENGINE_NVDEC: > ptr1 = 0x0270; > ptr0 = 0x0210; > break; > @@ -435,8 +449,12 @@ gk104_runl_commit(struct nvkm_runl *runl, struct > nvkm_memory *memory, u32 start, > int target; > > switch (nvkm_memory_target(memory)) { > - case NVKM_MEM_TARGET_VRAM: target = 0; break; > - case NVKM_MEM_TARGET_NCOH: target = 3; break; > + case NVKM_MEM_TARGET_VR...

...ueue_work(fctx->wq, &fctx->uevent_work); return NVIF_EVENT_KEEP; } @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ nouveau_fence_context_new(struct nouveau_channel *chan, struct nouveau_fence_cha INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fctx->pending); spin_lock_init(&fctx->lock); fctx->context = chan->drm->runl[chan->runlist].context_base + chan->chid; + fctx->wq = chan->drm->fence_wq; if (chan == chan->drm->cechan) strcpy(fctx->name, "copy engine channel"); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.h index 8bc065a...

...> > } > > > > @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ nouveau_fence_context_new(struct nouveau_channel *chan, struct nouveau_fence_cha > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fctx->pending); > > spin_lock_init(&fctx->lock); > > fctx->context = chan->drm->runl[chan->runlist].context_base + chan->chid; > > + fctx->wq = chan->drm->fence_wq; > > > > if (chan == chan->drm->cechan) > > strcpy(fctx->name, "copy engine channel"); > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouvea...

Hello everyone. I've asked for help a few days ago, but now I need help again. [Embarassed] Here I have another problem. I want to start World of Warcraft (wow.exe), I have downloaded wine with Yast. I've installed already a 3D-driver on my graphic-card. And I have already the "World of Warcraft" file. So, I want to start in the terminal with the command: wine "World

hi list, i experienced a weird behaviour of samba in the latest versions (3.0.20[a,b]) on XFS: directory: /data (owner=iso,group=edv) permissions: 2770 if i put a file in there with permissions 644 (owner=root,group=edv) i cannot delete it. windows tells even tells me, that it's readonly (read only bit set). and that's the only difference: 3.0.14a doesn't show the file as read

The following functions are not declared outside of the file they are in, so make them static to avoid these warnings: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c:745:1: warning: symbol 'gf100_gr_fecs_start_ctxsw' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c:760:1: warning: symbol 'gf100_gr_fecs_stop_ctxsw' was not declared. Should it be

...ifo/gk104.c @@ -906,7 +906,6 @@ gk104_fifo_oneinit(struct nvkm_fifo *base) struct gk104_fifo *fifo = gk104_fifo(base); struct nvkm_subdev *subdev = &fifo->base.engine.subdev; struct nvkm_device *device = subdev->device; - struct nvkm_vmm *bar = nvkm_bar_bar1_vmm(device); int engn, runl, pbid, ret, i, j; enum nvkm_devidx engidx; u32 *map; @@ -967,12 +966,19 @@ gk104_fifo_oneinit(struct nvkm_fifo *base) if (ret) return ret; - ret = nvkm_vmm_get(bar, 12, nvkm_memory_size(fifo->user.mem), - &fifo->user.bar); - if (ret) - return ret; + if (device->bar) {...

This is a collection of nouveau debug prints, memory leak, a very annoying race condition causing system hangs with prime scenarios, and a fix from Lyude to get the panel on my laptop working. I'd like to get these into 6.7, Dave.

From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> Hi Ben, these are a couple of patches that are in preparation for adding GV11B support. The fundamental issue that these are trying to solve is that the GV11B is the first Tegra incarnation of the GPU where the aperture really matters. All prior generations would accept any of them. For dGPUs we usually allocate memory in VRAM, so the default