search for: runaround

...with them. So far, when I've actually gotten ahold of a tech support person, they have told me to try different addresses for the server. They've changed recently from voip.teliax.com to ast01.teliax.com to voip-co1.teliax.com. Guess what? All the same server. Its just more of the same runaround. Since the day I switched to VoIP (with Teliax) as my primary outbound calling, more people have laughed at me for my choice of VoIP as a telco medium than can be counted. And these are people who respect me in the Telco community, and who I have been trying to convince of the benefits. They don&...

...69== FILE DESCRIPTORS: 4 open at exit. ==10769== Open file descriptor 3: /run/lock/chef-client ==10769== <inherited from parent> ... If we add the -o option to the flock call, valgrind produces this output: ==10784== FILE DESCRIPTORS: 3 open at exit. Eric - sorry for the runaround on this one - I should have read the details more closely. Unclear if you want to commit your patch or not, but it won't make a difference in this case. Closing - not a ulogd bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this m...

Hi, When we use BudgeTone where the DTMF is set to "via RTP (RFC2833)" all the DTMF functionality of Asterisk is working OK. When use Cisco 7960 the transfer is working OK, but when I try to "remote pick-up the call" through '*8#' I can't do that because the Cisco Phone start busy signal. How can I start using all DTMF features using Cisco Phone? Best

...syim/workspace/compiler/llvm/gcc-4.2.2/objdir-sparc/./gcc/as: line 2: exec: -Q: invalid option exec: usage: exec [-cl] [-a name] file [redirection ...] make[2]: *** [crtbegin.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/scr/ksyim/workspace/compiler/llvm/gcc-4.2.2/objdir-sparc/gcc' (2) If I runaround (1), there comes another error! /scr/ksyim/workspace/compiler/llvm/llvm-gcc4.2-2.3.source/objdir-sparc/./gcc /xgcc -B/scr/ksyim/workspace/compiler/llvm/llvm-gcc4.2-2.3.source/objdir-sparc/./g cc/ -B/home/ksyim/workspace/compiler/llvm/llvm-gcc4.2-2.3.source/release-sparc// sparc-sun-linux/bin/ -...

hello, I am using 2.6.21, lguest-2.6.21-307.patch.gz and an image from http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/Fedora7/Fedora7-x86-root_fs.bz2 the console hangs, is this expected or caused by the image? I can still ssh to it or if I boot in single user mode the console is available but running init3 and it's hung. also is it possible to get the last gz patch released for 2.6.21?

hello, I am using 2.6.21, lguest-2.6.21-307.patch.gz and an image from http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/Fedora7/Fedora7-x86-root_fs.bz2 the console hangs, is this expected or caused by the image? I can still ssh to it or if I boot in single user mode the console is available but running init3 and it's hung. also is it possible to get the last gz patch released for 2.6.21?

On Sep 28, 2008, at 9:46 PM, Keun Soo Yim wrote: > > Does anyone succeed at compiling Linux kernel for Sparc v8 > architecture? > I am currently trying to expand the regime of LLVM to Sparc kernel > codes. > The following is the initial error messages. Any comment is welcomed. > > #1. Inline Assembly The Sparc backend has no active maintainer [1]. This

Does anyone succeed at compiling Linux kernel for Sparc v8 architecture? I am currently trying to expand the regime of LLVM to Sparc kernel codes. The following is the initial error messages. Any comment is welcomed. #1. Inline Assembly Code: register struct thread_info *current_thread_info_reg asm("g6"); Error Message: include/asm/thread_info.h:77: error:

...d to sign up to solve all of >them (don't think they necessarily need solving). Potentially moving >the logic out into a separate tool as Fangrui's considering - a >post-link DWARF optimizer, rather than in-linker DWARF optimization. > >I really don't want to give you the runaround like this - but multiple >times slower links is something that seems pretty problematic for most >users, to the point of weighing the maintainability of lld against the >convenience of having this functionality in-linker rather than in a >post-link optimizer. > >(I know you've...

...m (don't think they necessarily need solving). Potentially moving >> >the logic out into a separate tool as Fangrui's considering - a >> >post-link DWARF optimizer, rather than in-linker DWARF optimization. >> > >> >I really don't want to give you the runaround like this - but multiple >> >times slower links is something that seems pretty problematic for most >> >users, to the point of weighing the maintainability of lld against the >> >convenience of having this functionality in-linker rather than in a >> >post-link op...

...rily need solving). Potentially moving >>>>> the logic out into a separate tool as Fangrui's considering - a >>>>> post-link DWARF optimizer, rather than in-linker DWARF optimization. >>>>> >>>>> I really don't want to give you the runaround like this - but multiple >>>>> times slower links is something that seems pretty problematic for most >>>>> users, to the point of weighing the maintainability of lld against the >>>>> convenience of having this functionality in-linker rather than in a &...

...moving >>>>>>> the logic out into a separate tool as Fangrui's considering - a >>>>>>> post-link DWARF optimizer, rather than in-linker DWARF optimization. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I really don't want to give you the runaround like this - but multiple >>>>>>> times slower links is something that seems pretty problematic for most >>>>>>> users, to the point of weighing the maintainability of lld against the >>>>>>> convenience of having this functionality in-l...

...out into a separate tool as Fangrui's > considering - a > >>>>>>> post-link DWARF optimizer, rather than in-linker DWARF > optimization. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I really don't want to give you the runaround like this - > but multiple > >>>>>>> times slower links is something that seems pretty > problematic for most > >>>>>>> users, to the point of weighing the maintainability of lld > against the > >>>>>...

...to a separate tool as Fangrui's considering - a >>> >>>>>>> post-link DWARF optimizer, rather than in-linker DWARF >>> optimization. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> I really don't want to give you the runaround like this - but >>> multiple >>> >>>>>>> times slower links is something that seems pretty problematic >>> for most >>> >>>>>>> users, to the point of weighing the maintainability of lld >>> against the >>&...

...nto a separate tool as Fangrui's considering - a >>>> >>>>>>> post-link DWARF optimizer, rather than in-linker DWARF optimization. >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> I really don't want to give you the runaround like this - but multiple >>>> >>>>>>> times slower links is something that seems pretty problematic for most >>>> >>>>>>> users, to the point of weighing the maintainability of lld against the >>>> >>>>>&gt...

>> >> >Alexey> Probably we could try to make DWARF easy to parsing, trimming, rewriting so that full DWARF >> >> >Alexey> parsing solution would not take too much time? >> >> >Alexey> >> >> >Alexey> f.e. -debug-types-section solution uses COMDAT sections to split and deduplicate types. >> >> >Alexey> That

...p settings: group::rwx Example 3: [my share] # create mask = 0620 whill create a file with the following group settings: group::r-- Only example 3 is as expected! So it looks like as soon as a 'create mask' is in a share the group permissions are or'ed with 'r-x'. So a good runaround is don't set a 'create mask' on a share on which you want to use ACL. I'm reall sorry if you are the right one to talk to but I have send it to the samba list aswell. Hope this helps making Samba better! Ries Return-Path: <spirit89@globetrotter.net> Delivered-To: samba@l...