search for: rummages

...e X86 implementation. I had a look over the code and will try to explain what I believe is going on but I may be mistaken as this is code I haven't looked at for over a year. The code above is needed as the GHC calling convention redefines what registers are considered callee save. No one else rummages in to the original function as all the other calling conventions use the same set of callee and caller save registers, so GHC is the only one that needs to differentiate. >> Based on knowledge of calling convention we return different set of callee saved >> registers. For example on AR...

Hi Duncan, On 10/14/11 03:56 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Karel, > >> > const unsigned* >> > ARMBaseRegisterInfo::getCalleeSavedRegs(const MachineFunction *MF) >> const { >> > + bool ghcCall = false; >> > + >> > + if (MF) { >> > + const Function *F = MF->getFunction(); >> > + ghcCall = (F ? F->getCallingConv() ==

ok. dont tell me i am lame. i already know. my question is.. where is the default stream name kept? i have rummaged through icecast.conf and ices.conf, and to no avail, i cannot find it. with no coding required on my part.. streaming works on my Alpha. wohoo! ja. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from

Hi Karel, >>> > const unsigned* >>> > ARMBaseRegisterInfo::getCalleeSavedRegs(const MachineFunction *MF) >>> const { >>> > + bool ghcCall = false; >>> > + >>> > + if (MF) { >>> > + const Function *F = MF->getFunction(); >>> > + ghcCall = (F ? F->getCallingConv() == CallingConv::GHC : false);

Hi Gabriel, ... > Summarizing, I have two questions: 1) is the CallGraph analysis "working as > intended" here?; and 2) what would be the correct approach > to modifying the proposed analysis in order to detect that randlc() is being > called in that CallInst ? the reason that the callgraph analysis does not try to understand indirect calls like this is that other passes

Hi Duncan, > const unsigned* > ARMBaseRegisterInfo::getCalleeSavedRegs(const MachineFunction *MF) const { > + bool ghcCall = false; > + > + if (MF) { > + const Function *F = MF->getFunction(); > + ghcCall = (F ? F->getCallingConv() == CallingConv::GHC : false); > + } > This bit looks dubious. Why do you need to do it? What exactly? We need

Hi Karel, > > const unsigned* > > ARMBaseRegisterInfo::getCalleeSavedRegs(const MachineFunction *MF) const { > > + bool ghcCall = false; > > + > > + if (MF) { > > + const Function *F = MF->getFunction(); > > + ghcCall = (F ? F->getCallingConv() == CallingConv::GHC : false); > > + } > > > This bit looks dubious. Why do you

On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 10:31 -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > Could you bisect ? I would love to point finger upstream to the DMA > folk who made changes to that API without testing with GPU. Rummaging a bit, it might be... nouveau_bo_new() ... ttm_dma_pool_alloc_new_pages() dma_alloc_attrs() ops->alloc() == x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent() x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent() flags |=

PS: It is possible that the C front-end doesn't need to explicitly produce BUILT_IN_POW because it is auto-synthesized somehow from a call to "pow". I wouldn't know. One way to find out is to compile a testcase and rummage around inside the gcc trees when they hit llvm-convert.

Under help(matrix) it is written: 'is.matrix' tests if its argument is a (strict) matrix. It is generic: you can write methods to handle specific classes of objects, see InternalMethods. Further down, under "Details", the meaning of "strict" is explained more explicitly: 'is.matrix' returns 'TRUE' if 'x' is a matrix

I've rummaged through the archives and documentation and have yet to find references to nbsd or mention of how to implement overhead paging using chan_oss as mentioned in the list previously. I suspect that one would use a soundcard in the PBX system and feed the output to speakers and/or PA system. Would someone please point me to some procedures or documentation to acomplish overhead paging?

I am trying to categorize the machine instructions based on associated static (i.e., as encoded in .td file) machine description and the corresponding APIs. I would like to perform appropriate actions based on the kind of instruction in a tool that I am working on. For example, I'd like to distinguish between memop instructions involving immediate vs register. While it appears that I would be

Hi David, > The code above is needed as the GHC calling convention redefines what > registers are considered callee save. No one else rummages in to the > original function as all the other calling conventions use the same > set of callee and caller save registers, so GHC is the only one that > needs to differentiate. shouldn't the caller also know what registers are callee saved so that it can avoid saving the contents of t...

According to Wikipedia: "In 1980 the first version of S was distributed outside Bell Laboratories and in 1981 source versions were made available." but I've been unable to locate any version of S online. Does anyone have a copy, somewhere, rusting away on an old hard disk or slowly flaking off a tape? I've had a rummage round the CMU Statlib on archive.org but no sign of it,

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1409 Bug ID: 1409 Summary: nft manpage makes confusing reference to logical operators Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

Hey, hoping I can get some guidance on how this works. I've got a running samba standalone setup. On one of my shares, I want to preserve the ACL of files as they come from the client (Win 7), in essence acting as a file backup. My setup for this share is currently: valid users = @wheel public = no writeable = yes vfs objects = btrfs acl_xattr # acl_xattr: ignore system acls = yes # map

Does agent forwarding work with DSA keys? I'm using 2.2.0p1 on RedHat Linux 6.2 (Alpha) and Solaris 2.6 (SPARC). If I ssh-add my RSA key into the local agent and ssh to another machine, the agent connection is forwarded properly. (I can say "ssh-add -l" and see my keys.) If I ssh-add my DSA key into the local agent and "ssh -2" to another machine, the agent connection

> > I am wondering about the status of GSoc this year. The mailing list seems to be rather quiet on the topic. Has anyone thought of project ideas? > We just received confirmation that LLVM was accepted for this year GSoC. > The ideas list, as usual, is placed at > http://llvm.org/OpenProjects.html (it also contains links to > subproject's ideas pages). > > Please

On 01.09.20 17:22, James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 16:05 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:52:40AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: >>> I think this looks mostly OK, except for one misnamed parameter >>> below. Unfortunately, the last non-coherent parisc was the 700 >>> series and I no longer own a box, so I can't test

On 15 October 2011 00:31, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi David, > >> The code above is needed as the GHC calling convention redefines what >> registers are considered callee save. No one else rummages in to the >> original function as all the other calling conventions use the same >> set of callee and caller save registers, so GHC is the only one that >> needs to differentiate. > > shouldn't the caller also know what registers are callee saved so that it > can avoi...