search for: rumen

...o everyone, I am trying to tweak some of the sysctl tunables for the ix (ixgbe) driver in FreeBSD 9.2 since I am experiencing less than ideal performance and it seems like I can't find any: # sysctl -a | grep -i ixgbe device ixgbe I am running 9.2-RC4. Any input appreciated. Thanks, -- Rumen Telbizov Unix Systems Administrator <http://telbizov.com>

Hi, Two quick questions that I can't seem to find answers for using google. 1) is is possible to listen outside an ipfw firewall - that is have ethereal record the packets before ipfw starts dropping them? If so how? 2) Is there an api to ipfw that will let me manipulate rules, query stats etc? I need something faster than running the command line binary? Thanks John

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2003-02-03 19:50 ------- i'll look into this. ------- You are

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431 ------- Additional Comments From gfernandez at livevault.com 2002-11-08 00:36 ------- Created an attachment (id=174) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=174&action=view) adds readonly flag to scp this change applies to scp.c ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are

Dear all, I found a bug in the which() function. When trying to remove elements with the which function, if the criteria is not matched, numeric(0) is returned instead of the array itself. This is very weird. > a = c(1,2,3,4,5) > a[!a==6] [1] 1 2 3 4 5 > a[-which(a==6)] numeric(0) > a[-which(a==5)] [1] 1 2 3 4 > a[!a==5] [1] 1 2 3 4 Is this correct? I believe this is a bug. I

...aybe this should sound like: if ( (udmamode > 2) && (udmamode < 5) && (!atadev->param->hwres_cblid) ) { ata_prtdev(atadev,"DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device\n"); udmamode = 2; } All comments are wellcome. Thank you in advance Rumen Telbizov

Hi, I'm pondering building my own SSL accelerator out of a multi-CPU FreeBSD system and a crypto accelerator. What's the recommended hardware crypto accelerator card these days? Thanks, ==ml -- Michael Lucas mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org Today's chance of throwing it all away to start a goat farm: 49.1% http://www.BlackHelicopters.org/~mwlucas/

I am just finished support for x509 certificate. More information on this page: http://satva.skalasoft.com/~rumen/openssh/

Hi All, Please visit http://satva.skalasoft.com/~rumen/openssh/ to get new version with support for x509 certificate. - added authorization by 'Distinguished Name'; - added x509 CA store (new options in sshd_config); - client certificate is verified against CA certificates in x509 store; - added shell scripts to create 'Test CA' and tes...

...SSH Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_2.5.2p2 debug1: ...... debug1: authentications that can continue: publickey,password,keyboard-interactive debug1: next auth method to try is publickey debug1: userauth_pubkey_agent: testing agent key /home/rumen/.ssh/skala_rsa.id debug1: input_userauth_pk_ok: pkalg ssh-rsa blen 151 lastkey 0x808d758 hint -1 debug1: ssh-userauth2 successful: method publickey debug1: ...... NO problem to CONNECT debug1: ...... debug1: Exit status 0

New version "x509e" is out on http://satva.skalasoft.com/~rumen/openssh/ . Now OpenSSH (client and server) can use x509 certificates for hostkeys too. Try it and give to forum (prefered) feedbacks, comments, suggestions, etc.

Hi all, I have pleasure to announce new version f of "X.509 certificates support in OpenSSH" Please to update your bookmarks/favorites with new location: http://roumenpetrov.info/openssh Old location is available too: http://satva.skalasoft.com/~rumen/openssh What's new: * support "Certificate Revocation Lists" (CRLs) * ssh-keyscan can show hostkey with certificates * information about X.509 certificates support added to all necessary manual pages * Distinguished name/Subject in RFC2253 format and item order is not imp...

Hi, Could anyone pls help by telling me how the DH pubkey from the server (f) is encoded when it is sent back to me? I understand that it comes across as an mpint, but after I decode the mpint into the bytes that make up the number, what does this number represent? Is it a X509 encoded key? Or is it something else? The reason for my question: I am trying to write a ssh client in Java,

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |djm at mindrot.org Alias| |generalised-askpass -- Configure bugmail:

Hello All, As I promised, I've completed and initial patch for openssh PKCS#11 support. The same framework is used also by openvpn. I want to help everyone who assisted during development. This patch is based on the X.509 patch from http://roumenpetrov.info/openssh/ written by Rumen Petrov, supporting PKCS#11 without X.509 looks like a bad idea. *So the first question is: What is the merge status of Ruman's patch?* The PKCS#11 patch modify ssh-add and ssh-agent to support PKCS#11 private keys and certificates. It allows using multiple PKCS#11 providers at the same ti...

Hello All. As promised, here is what I needed to do to get the regression tests to work on AIX & HPUX. It goes into a bit of detail in the hope that others might be able to get them running on their platforms. I've run these mods on AIX 4.3.3, HP-UX 11.00, Solaris 8, Redhat 7.3 and OpenBSD 3.0. The problems I encountered: * prereqs (pmake, md5sum) * bad directory owner/mode causing auth

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601 Summary: configure script doesen't setup preprocessor flags properly Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.6.1p2 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo:

http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2004/236929/index.htm ----Quote---- "The impact of this vulnerability varies by vendor and application, but in some deployment scenarios it is rated critical. Please see the vendor section below for further information. Alternatively contact your vendor for product specific information. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow an attacker to create a