Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "rumars".
Did you mean:
kumar
2004 May 01
0
[LLVMdev] Open Source Contributions (was Re: Benchmarks)
...'ve thought about this, the more that I'm beginning to realize
that CVS is the root of the problem. Perhaps it is time for LLVM to
seriously start looking at switching over to a decentralized version
control system? I really am not "up" on the various options, but I've
heard rumars that there are now several good options.
Take 'arch' for example: its approach seems like it would solve almost all
of the version control issues that we are facing, and supports
decentralized development in particular. From what I understand, you
would be able to do all of your developme...
2004 May 01
5
[LLVMdev] Open Source Contributions (was Re: Benchmarks)
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 10:57, Chris Lattner wrote:
> There is a chance, but as Vikram mentioned, it's not extremely likely to
> happen in the immediate future. However, if you or someone else wrote the
> makefiles neccesary to the suite to the llvm/test/Programs hierarchy, we
> would be happy to add them and have our automated testers run them. :)
>
> In particular, I'd
2004 May 05
2
[LLVMdev] Open Source Contributions (was Re: Benchmarks)
...t this, the more that I'm beginning to realize
> that CVS is the root of the problem. Perhaps it is time for LLVM to
> seriously start looking at switching over to a decentralized version
> control system? I really am not "up" on the various options, but I've
> heard rumars that there are now several good options.
>
> Take 'arch' for example: its approach seems like it would solve almost all
> of the version control issues that we are facing, and supports
> decentralized development in particular. From what I understand, you
> would be able to...
2004 May 02
4
[LLVMdev] Open Source Contributions (was Re: Benchmarks)
...t this, the more that I'm beginning to realize
> that CVS is the root of the problem. Perhaps it is time for LLVM to
> seriously start looking at switching over to a decentralized version
> control system? I really am not "up" on the various options, but I've
> heard rumars that there are now several good options.
>
> Take 'arch' for example: its approach seems like it would solve almost all
> of the version control issues that we are facing, and supports
> decentralized development in particular. From what I understand, you
> would be able to...