search for: rujoshi

Hi, How can I get access to LLVM source code? Thanks, Rahul

Hi, I am trying to assemble a preety simple program, but the assembler is giving parse errors: =========================== %.LC0 = internal constant [17 x sbyte] c"Hello World %d \0A\00" %.LC1 = internal constant [17 x sbyte] c"yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy\0a\00" declare int "puts"(sbyte*) int "main"() { %cast1 = getelementptr [17 x sbyte]* %.LC0, long 0, long 0

Hi, I am trying to use LLVM as a library with some other code base. My problem is with the directory structure of 'include'. My original code base has include/Support and include/boost directories. So I cannot just replicate the entire llvm/include directory structure under the original 'include' directory. If I create a sym link llvm in the include/ directory, then various

Hi, I want to run the Mem2Reg pass on a function without using the the LLVM opt utility. I wrote some code, which I am not sure is correct: TS_ASSERT(!verifyFunction(*function)); // find the dominance frontier of the CFG DominanceFrontier DF; DF.runOnFunction(*function); // try to promote stack allocated variables PromoteMemToReg(function->getRegAllocas(), DF, *tgt_data);

Hi, I assume that since each pass is in its own anonymous namespace, we cannot directly create a new pass object; looking at the code for 'opt' utility, it seems we need a PassInfo object, using which we create a new pass object. I tried the following code (which I wrote after looking at the code for bugpoint), but the list of passes seems to be empty: // Create a list of all the

Hi, I have a question about tracing BB's in LLVM. When tracing BB's, does LLVM insert instrumentation code in each BB? Thanks, Rahul

Hi LLVMDev, The GCC frontend for LLVM inserts a call to a __main() in the main() function. Whats the purpose of this? And which LLVM library do I need to link to satisfy the reference? Thanks, Rahul

Hi LLVMdev, The stuff I am working on requires linking 9-10 LLVM libraries, along with a few libs of my own. The linker is taking a long time to do that, about 6 mins (on a P4 with 512 MB mem). I tried the latest (2.14) release of binutils, but that didn't help. Is anyone aware of any solution to this? Thanks, Rahul

Hi, I checked out the LLVM code today, and it seems Value is no longer a subclass of Annotable. Is IR annotation still supported? Right now, I just need to annotate global variables. Thanks Rahul

I would also find this extension framework useful. Particularly, I would like to add intrinsics (without checking them into the LLVM source), and an "opaque" instruction which does not write to memory (and hence can be DCEliminated). Just a thought... Rahul ---- Original message ---- >Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:41:17 -0800 >From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com>

I have been working on something along similar lines: translating Alpha machine code into LLVM. It is probably much more simple to handle Alpha instructions than x86 instructions. Translating individual instructions is easy, more analysis is needed to eliminate things like register allocated variables, function call setup/prolog/epilogue etc. Machine specific operations can be encoded using

Hi LLVMdev, I am trying to add declarations of some functions in a module, and the following assert is failing test_task_inst: Type.cpp:130: const Type* Type::getForwardedTypeInternal() const: Assertion `ForwardType && "This type is not being forwarded to another type!"' failed. Any idea what the bug might be? The code was working about 3 months ago, and I am not aware of

Hello, I have observed that the LLVM build takes pretty long time to link executables (i.e. tools). Is that a normal behavior? Thanks, Rahul

Hi LLVMdev, Sorry about the bad title, but I hope you will get my idea. I think that in many LLVM programs that create/modify the LLVM IR (like say a language frontend/profiler etc), and in other cases too, some of the code is just "mechanical", for example creating function types takes like 4-5 lines of code, but nothing interesting goes on there. I think we can get rid of such code by

Coming back to the issues that I had integrating LLVM with MSSP, will the code in include/Support also be put in the llvm namespace? That will solve many problems and help prevent others. Rahul ---- Original message ---- >Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 10:13:03 -0600 (CST) >From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> >Subject: [LLVMdev] LLVM namespac'ification >To: LLVMdev List