Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "rui314".
Did you mean:
puid14
2019 Mar 01
3
Linker option to dump dependency graph
...ould
be doing exactly what MarkLive.cpp is doing.
Peter
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 5:15 PM Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I hacked up a patch to make lld output a dependency graph in the graphviz
> "dot" format.
>
> https://gist.github.com/rui314/4eab9f328a5568b682d11c84d328cdaa -- this
> is a patch, which is just visiting all input sections and relocations. Note
> that this is far from completion but just a proof-of-concept.
>
> https://gist.github.com/rui314/5e85c559835ecddad46dcf02fe3ffafc is a
> result of static-linking a...
2019 Jun 21
2
Linker option to dump dependency graph
...t;
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 5:15 PM Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> I hacked up a patch to make lld output a dependency graph in the
> graphviz "dot" format.
> >>
> >> https://gist.github.com/rui314/4eab9f328a5568b682d11c84d328cdaa --
> this is a patch, which is just visiting all input sections and relocations.
> Note that this is far from completion but just a proof-of-concept.
> >>
> >> https://gist.github.com/rui314/5e85c559835ecddad46dcf02fe3ffafc is a
> result o...
2019 Jun 21
2
Linker option to dump dependency graph
...Ueyama via llvm-dev <
>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> I hacked up a patch to make lld output a dependency graph in the
>>> graphviz "dot" format.
>>> >>
>>> >> https://gist.github.com/rui314/4eab9f328a5568b682d11c84d328cdaa --
>>> this is a patch, which is just visiting all input sections and relocations.
>>> Note that this is far from completion but just a proof-of-concept.
>>> >>
>>> >> https://gist.github.com/rui314/5e85c559835ecddad46...
2019 Feb 28
2
Linker option to dump dependency graph
+1 for graphviz dot format, so that it can be consumed by any one of many
existing graph visualization tools.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 7:29 PM Shi, Steven via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >To summarise, I think we may
> > be able to do quite well with some very simple extra analysis in LLD,
> > a machine readable dependency graph would also be very