Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "rudsve".
Did you mean:
rude
2000 May 03
1
Process per share control.
A long time ago, and I could be mistaken, I thought samba could be
configured so that instead of a smbd process per user/machine it would
spawn a process per share/user/machine. If it still can, could someone
point me in the right direction?
Thanks!
Weldon Godfrey
Sr. Systems Specialist
Science Applications International Corporation
2002 Sep 25
1
NGROUPS_MAX
Currently openssh (3.4p1) relies on the NGROUPS_MAX define. This makes
the number of allowed simultaneous (per-user) secondary groups a
compile-time decision.
$ find . -name \*.c | xargs grep NGROUPS_MAX
./groupaccess.c:static char *groups_byname[NGROUPS_MAX + 1]; /* +1 for base/primary group */
./groupaccess.c: gid_t groups_bygid[NGROUPS_MAX + 1];
./uidswap.c:static gid_t
2000 Jan 13
1
observations on nt smb support = no
We use Samba 2.0.6 as server, the clients are about 10 NCD WinCenter
(NT 3.51 multiuser, WinCenter 3.0.34 based on Citrix WinFrame 1.6)
machines with about 70 concurrent users each and several WinCenter (as
above) and NT Terminal Server (NT 4.0 multiuser with
MetaFrame/WinCenter (X11 addon)) machines.
The 2.0.6 smb.conf manpage says:
nt smb support (G)
This boolean
2000 Feb 03
2
use sysconf instead of NGROUPS_MAX
Currently samba (2.0.6) relies on the NGROUPS_MAX define. This makes
the number of allowed simultaneous (per-user) secondary groups a
compile-time decision.
$ find . -name \*.c | xargs grep NGROUPS
./source/lib/system.c: if (setlen > NGROUPS_MAX) {
./source/lib/replace.c: gid_t grouplst[NGROUPS_MAX];
./source/lib/replace.c: while (i < NGROUPS_MAX &&