search for: rudely

I'm sory for my weak english. I need to analyze this subject : x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 y 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 czarne 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 rude 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 braz 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 blond 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 rude 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 blond 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 czarne 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 blond 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 blond 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 czarne 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 czarne 1 0 1 0 0 0

On 10/29/2020 6:13 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > Dan, Rowland spends an inordinate amount of time on > our lists helping out people with Samba configurations > of all kinds. The least people can do is to be polite > when asking for help. > I was under the impression that I was being sarcastic/funny. If I didn't come across that way, then I am sorry. I certainly didn't

From the r-help posting guidelines: > Good manners: Remember that customs differ. Some people are very direct. Others surround everything they say with hedges and apologies. Be tolerant. Rudeness is never warranted, but sometimes `read the manual' is the appropriate response. Don't waste time discussing such matters on the list. Ad hominem comments are absolutely out of place. It

> So... Are 40 and 41 the only legal behaviors or are there more? Since the program invokes undefined behavior, anything goes. The compiler is perfectly within its rights to send a rude email to your department chair if you compile that code. John

Hi everyone, The CentOS project is looking for more slogans that may end up on promotional material (eg media, flyers, posters or stickers). We already collected a few funny, ironic, sarcastic or even distasteful ones. Feel free to visit our Slogans wiki page for a good laugh or rude offenses and add your own slogan by sending them to this thread. See: http://wiki.centos.org/Promo/Slogans

<polite mode> > x %inherits% "data.frame" IMHO, I think that user-defined binary operators are being over-used within the R community. I don't think that they're "cute" or stylish. I think their use should be limited to cases, where they significantly increase the readability of the code. However, readability, is a (partly) subjective topic...

> You can have your own rant about "user-defined binary operators being > over-used within the R community" without suggesting that my rant was > rude. I wasn't suggesting that you were rude. I was questioning a trend.

I am sorry that I know I should provide a dataset that allows to replicate my problem. It is a research dataset and quite large, so I can not share. Both Bert and Tim guessed my problem correctly. I also thought about the conflicting issue between different packages and function masking. I just hope to that someone has similar experience, so providing me suggestion. For conflicting issue,

Hi Arnold, deleting that is a bit rude, and svn will recover it when doing "svn up" next time. A better solution is to cd llvm-gcc svn switch libstdc++ missing This permanently tells svn to see an empty dir instead of the c++ lib. Sabre wanted to put this into the README, dunno if this happened. Cheers, Gabor Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: > Ups just saw i forgot to delete

Concur ... I reckon that you need a bunch of how tos, that you can sent these rude people. I think that you are a victim of your own success. Samba has hit the mainstream, and now you are paying the price :-) Still ........ I prefer these messages to those filled with hypertext ... or worse.... 2 Meg of mime formatted drivel :-) Has anybody thanked you recently for providing so much help on

Technically, it could've sent the mail before you even thought about writing it. Undefined is undefined, there are no requirements. From: Dustin Laurence Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 6:50 AM To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is this a bug in clang? On 04/19/2011 10:50 PM, John Regehr wrote: > The compiler is perfectly within its rights to send a rude email to your >

Latest really rude show stoppers were/are: el6: - librsvg2: your private fork bomb for gnome - kernel: scheduler completely broken on numa systems - qt: kde unusable when going up from -26 to -28 el5: - firefox hangs on quit after latest ESR update - (totem plugins no longer work too) What I am using an enterprise distro for?? -Michael PS: I'm only wondering :)

I sometimes think people on this list are quite rude to posters. I'm afraid I'm likely to join in with some rudeness? 1. "Here is some code that works but also doesn't" is probably not going to get you an answer 2. I provide no information about the data it works on or doesn't 3. I tell you I'm using a load of dependencies, but don't tell you what 4. I refer to

Dear all, I am beginner using R. I have a question about it. When you use it, since it is written by so many authors, how do you know that the results are trustable?(I don't want to affend anyone, also I trust people). But I think this should be a question. Thanks, Ming

Dear all, I am beginner using R. I have a question about it. When you use it, since it is written by so many authors, how do you know that the results are trustable?(I don't want to affend anyone, also I trust people). But I think this should be a question. Thanks, Ming

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Using both 1.2rc5 and hg version a9d3108d0cec from today, when I run the expire tools program, I receive the following error. # /usr/local/sbin/dovecot --exec-mail ext /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/expire-tool --test /usr/local/sbin/dovecot --exec-mail ext /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/expire-tool --testError:

Hello, Inline. ?s 19:03 de 12/06/2024, Yuan Chun Ding via R-help escreveu: > I am sorry that I know I should provide a dataset that allows to replicate my problem. > > It is a research dataset and quite large, so I can not share. > > Both Bert and Tim guessed my problem correctly. I also thought about the conflicting issue between different packages and function masking. > I

I''m going to start being rude with people if I don''t take a break from the list for a while. I''ll be back in a couple of days after I cool off..... --Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Off-list replies are cheerfully ignored Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key

I'm setting up certbot/letsencrypt to provide a certificate for dovecot and sendmail. Is it necessary to restart dovecot to load the new certificate, as shown in most examples I find in blogs? That seems rude to established connections. When does dovecot read the cert and key files? Once at startup or each time a connection requests SSL? Is there a preferred locking protocol when changing

"Andrew C. Ward" <acward at uqconnect.net.au> : >With respect to 'tone' and 'friendliness', perhaps all that >is meant or needed is that people be polite and respectful. >I shake my head as often at rude answers Oh, by gosh, by golly. I don't think an occasional dose of 'real life', via a jab from the Professor, will cause any lasting harm