Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ru_llvm".
Did you mean:
__llvm
2009 Apr 13
1
[LLVMdev] Porting LLVM backend is no fun yet
...learning curve less
steep and thus started such backend by myself. You can monitor the git
repository at http://repo.or.cz/w/llvm/msp430.git. It contains dummy
backend and also has several early steps already done.
There is also some description what's going on
http://community.livejournal.com/ru_llvm/, but unfortunately, only in
russian. Hopefully someday it become a proper "Backend for Dummies"
article.
Hope this will help somehow.
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
2009 Apr 13
0
[LLVMdev] Porting LLVM backend is no fun yet
Hi Greg,
I understand your frustration. I've been on this mailing list for a
little over a year hoping that by osmosis I could get a a better
handle on writing a back end for LLVM. Although I feel more
comfortable with the nomenclature, I still do not have a clue as to
how to begin (actually I do, but it sounds more dramatic saying it
this way). I've read the documentation, but
2009 Apr 12
9
[LLVMdev] Porting LLVM backend is no fun yet
As we've already seen, David Chisnall prefers hacking LLVM over GCC (see
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1215438): "In contrast,
every time I look at the GCC code, it takes two people to
prevent me from clawing my eyeballs out."
I'm sorry to report that so-far I have had the opposite experience.
Some years ago, I ported binutils (via CGEN) and GCC to an