search for: rtti_ptr_ti

Hi all, I'd like to propose that LLVM IR have a mechanism to describe sections in a more explicit way than we can today. Currently, we provide an attribute called "section" on GlobalVariables and Functions. This attribute will choose which section the Value will end up in. However, it does not describe the attributes of the section. Without a way of describing the section, we try

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > I think LLVM needs new IR to represent these semantics properly. > Cool! This proposal makes a lot of sense to me. > > - Sections have linkage, all Values inside of a section must agree with > the > > section's linkage. > > This seems way too restrictive and I