Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "rtportal".
Did you mean:
portal
2008 Oct 15
3
[PATCH] use tlsf for xmalloc engine
...229, found here:
http://code.google.com/p/compcache/source/browse/trunk/sub-projects/allocators/tlsf-kmod
with description and performance details here:
http://code.google.com/p/compcache/wiki/TLSFAllocator
(new Xen code uses 4K=PAGE_SIZE for the region size)
For detailed info on tlsf, see:
http://rtportal.upv.es/rtmalloc/
(NOTE to Isaku-san: There may be some subtle alignment or PAGE_SIZE
issues to get tlsf to work on ia64. I have not tried it.
If problems, use an ifdef in common/Makefile to change to
the legacy xmalloc on ia64.)
Signed-off by: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>...
2010 Mar 27
1
[RFC] GSoC 2010: Memory Compression for Virtualized Environments
...patch for CIFS VFS implementation on kernel 2.6.8
to send multiple read requests in parallel (http://linux-mm.org/NitinGupta)
* Were you involved in other OpenSource development projects in the past?
which, when and in what role?
- Ported to kernel and extended TLSF allocator
allocator (http://rtportal.upv.es/rtmalloc/) with support for multiple
memory pools. This has replaced Xen's default xmalloc allocator.
- Currently developing small IDE especially suited for large C based projects
like the Linux kernel: http://code.google.com/p/kxref/ (low priority)
* Why have you chosen your developm...
2010 Mar 27
1
[RFC] GSoC 2010: Memory Compression for Virtualized Environments
...patch for CIFS VFS implementation on kernel 2.6.8
to send multiple read requests in parallel (http://linux-mm.org/NitinGupta)
* Were you involved in other OpenSource development projects in the past?
which, when and in what role?
- Ported to kernel and extended TLSF allocator
allocator (http://rtportal.upv.es/rtmalloc/) with support for multiple
memory pools. This has replaced Xen's default xmalloc allocator.
- Currently developing small IDE especially suited for large C based projects
like the Linux kernel: http://code.google.com/p/kxref/ (low priority)
* Why have you chosen your developm...