search for: rtools44

...> OPENMP = -fopenmp > > And, of course, blas/Makefiles.win has been patched to read the proper > library, which I've been doing for over a decade. Ok, could you please try the very same build (so the same version of R, same options, same external libs) with the previous version of Rtools44? Does that pass? Thanks Tomas > > Thank you again! > >>> This may be unrelated, but as I was monitoring the compilation, I saw >>> an warning which I haven't seen before in the 20 or so years I've been >>> building R on Windows: >>> >>&g...

...the previous behavior was also documented in pcre2pattern.3: "For example, {,6} is not a quantifier, but a literal string of four characters" I've confirmed with R built with PCRE2 10.42, 10.43 and 10.44. In practice, users would most likely see the new behavior on Windows, where Rtools44 has PCRE2 10.43. The R documentation (?regex) refers to the PCRE2 documentation for "complete details", mentioning how to find out what is the version of PCRE(2) used.? I've now added a warning about that PCRE behavior may change between versions, with the {,m} as an example. I do...

Hi dear friend I use rgdal package for shape files. When installing the package, it gives me the following error, a picture of the error is attached. What command should I run to fix this error? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: error.png Type: image/png Size: 119454 bytes Desc: not available URL:

...opped when building Rblas with the following error: -------- Building ../../../bin/x64/Rblas.dll -------- gcc -s -shared -o ../../../bin/x64/Rblas.dll blas00.o ../../gnuwin32/dllversion.o Rblas.def \ -L../../../bin/x64 -lR -L"C:/R/OPB/OpenBLAS-develop-f0560f9" -fopenmp -lopenblas C:\rtools44\x86_64-w64-mingw32.static.posix\bin/ld.exe: cannot export zspmv_: symbol not defined collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [Makefile.win:14: ../../../bin/x64/Rblas.dll] Error 1 make[3]: *** [Makefile:227: Rblas] Error 2 make[2]: *** [Makefile:116: rbuild] Error 2 make[1]: ***...

On 2/23/24 14:34, avi.e.gross at gmail.com wrote: > This may be a dumb question and the answer may make me feel dumber. > > I have had trouble for years with R packages wanting Rtools on my machine > and not being able to use it. Many packages are fine as binaries are > available. I have loaded Rtools and probably need to change my PATH or > something. I suppose making sure

Thanks Tomas. Do note that my original post also mentioned a bug or doc error in the PCRE docs for this regexp: > - perl = TRUE does *not* give the documented result on at least one > system (which is "123456789", because "{,5}" is documented to not be a > quantifier, so it should only match the literal string "{,5}"). Duncan On 2024-08-01 6:49 a.m.,

...er interfaces provide LAPACK 3.9.1 rather than 3.2.1: 3.9.1 is from 2021-04 and does not include the improved algorithms introduced in LAPACK 3.10.0 (including for BLAS calls). INSTALLATION on WINDOWS: * The makefiles and installer scripts for Windows have been tailored to Rtools44, an update of the Rtools43 toolchain. It is based on GCC 13 and newer versions of MinGW-W64, binutils and libraries (targeting 64-bit Intel CPUs). R-devel can no longer be built using Rtools43 without changes. * Rtools44 has experimental support for 64-bit ARM (aarch64) CPU...

...er interfaces provide LAPACK 3.9.1 rather than 3.2.1: 3.9.1 is from 2021-04 and does not include the improved algorithms introduced in LAPACK 3.10.0 (including for BLAS calls). INSTALLATION on WINDOWS: * The makefiles and installer scripts for Windows have been tailored to Rtools44, an update of the Rtools43 toolchain. It is based on GCC 13 and newer versions of MinGW-W64, binutils and libraries (targeting 64-bit Intel CPUs). R-devel can no longer be built using Rtools43 without changes. * Rtools44 has experimental support for 64-bit ARM (aarch64) CPU...