search for: rtlinux

Could anyone help me out, i've got a situation here. :-) I already contacted RTLinux users with no success, I hope ext3 users can help! I have a 2.2.19 kernel patched with RTLinux 3.1, clean and working. I found and applied the ext3 for 2.2.19 kernel patch. Patch went fine (like in README). I was able to tune2fs -j /dev/hda1 (activate the journal). And it actually works. 1) I was...

Hi, for a RTlinux application I need to install a 2.4.0 kernel. prevoisly, my kernel 2.4.10 was supporting the ext3 fs and all my fs were under ext3. as 2.4.0 doesn't support ext3 I've got a problem to boot cause /proc is recognise as a ext3 fs and my kernel doesnt know how to mount it. what can I do and ho...

...t; equivalents too if you ran a 32-bit kernel there. Adding random aliasing on an ad-hoc basis doesn't scale or represent what's really going on. > In the Arch side, ARMv7l is *really* ARMv7A, so it should not have any > further knowledge about the rest of the environment. What does RTLinux on an R-class CPU present itself as? My guess would be "armv7l" too. I'm not too concerned about deciding that we only care about A-class Linux, but I am concerned about taking an unprincipled approach to the l/b suffix. Not enough that I can't live with it though. As you say thi...

Hi All, I need one information How much effort is required to port the the rSync utility to any of the RTOS available? (how much is the linux dependent code in the implementattion?) regards Thanks in Advance Biju -- Biju Perumal HCL Technologies Ltd. Voice +91-44-3728366 (Xtn-1134) http://san.hcltech.com

Hi all, Thank you so much for this discussion. It has been very helpful and educational. I think that I understand the perspectives of both Tim and Renato. Let me briefly summarize them to ensure that I correctly understand: Renato’s perspective is that the triple means whatever the author says it does, and that may or not be meaningful. :) In the case of armv7l (for example) it has a clear

On 5 January 2016 at 09:13, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > Anyhow, Artyom's proposal is the best, IMO, to treat it like an alias > and handle like v7A internally. If we end up needing specific > decisions in the driver, it should stay in the driver. That's rather a hack, given that the 'l' actually has semantic meaning, but I suppose I could live

Hi all,     I want to recompile the 2.6.24.19-xen kernel provided by Ubuntu hardy. I have install the linux-source linux-header deb but don''t know how to include the "xen patch" to the 2.6.24 source (I know 2.6.24 have Xen forward-ported) and compile the kernel. I am sorry this is quite a newbie question.. Could anyone help me?     Basically I want to compile a 2.6.24 Xen

...epartament d'Informtica de Sistemes i Computadors, XtratuM. o Herman Haertig - Technical University Dresden, Germany,Institute for System Architecture, L4/Fiasco/L4Linux. o Nicholas Mc Guire - Lanzhou University, P.R. China, Distributed and Embedded Systems Lab, RTLinux/GPL. o Douglas Niehaus - University of Kansas, USA, Information and Telecommunication Technology Center, RT-preempt. Organization committee: * Prof. Li LIAN (Co-Chair), (SISE, Lanzhou University, CHINA) * Xiaoping ZHANG, LZU, CHINA * Jiming WANG, PKU, CHINA * Zh...

...ans RaspberryPi, and add a number of > FIXMEs to the parser: > 1. To remove both L/B variants as aliases > 2. To implement L/B in getCanonical in the same way as EB/BE > 3. But only once Triple/Tuple can replace the "v7l" -> "v7a when > Linux" OR "v7R when RTLinux" logic (I have no idea how this will pan > out). > > To know about the progress on Tuple, check with Daniel Sanders and > Eric Christopher (CC'd). > > Adding this hack to the Driver now could make the mess even worse at this stage. > > cheers, > --renato

...gt; hack is that the Driver/Triple/Tuple are using that to mean everything > else. Sure. In exactly the same way there's no "armebv7" in TargetParser. There's principled(ish) parsing of the "eb" when deciding what the triple actually means though. >> What does RTLinux on an R-class CPU present itself as? My guess would >> be "armv7l" too. > > Nope. GNU triples have a very specific meaning because that's what's > generated from the configure-time options. I have no idea what you're objecting to here. I wasn't saying anyth...