search for: rtdyldlinkinglayer

...s Mailing List <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Date: 16.05.2017 18:37 Subject: Re: JIT - Resolve obj file without a main Hi Björn, I don't recall ever seeing this behavior before. Can you describe the situation in more detail? Is this specifically for object files loaded via RTDyldLinkingLayer::addObjectSet, or does it apply to IR Modules without a main too? When you say the JIT won't resolve an address, do you mean that you can't find anything when you call findSymbol on the JIT, or that the JIT isn't calling your SymbolResolver back to find addresses? Was this for MacO...

Hello Lang, I noticed, if I load a obj-File without a main-function, the Jitter won't resolve any address. But if I have a main, everything works fine. Why is this so? Is there a way to stop this? Kind regards Björn Als GmbH eingetragen im Handelsregister Bad Homburg v.d.H. HRB 9816, USt.ID-Nr. DE 114 165 789 Geschäftsführer: Hiroshi Kawamura, Dr Hiroshi Nakamura, Markus Bode, Heiko

...List <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Date: 16.05.2017 18:37 Subject: Re: JIT - Resolve obj file without a main Hi Björn, I don't recall ever seeing this behavior before. Can you describe the situation in more detail? Is this specifically for object files loaded via RTDyldLinkingLayer::addObjectSet, or does it apply to IR Modules without a main too? When you say the JIT won't resolve an address, do you mean that you can't find anything when you call findSymbol on the JIT, or that the JIT isn't calling your SymbolResolver back to find addresses? Was this for Ma...

Hi Bjoern, CCing cfg-dev (since that's where the conversation started) and llvm-dev (since it's relevant there). Do you know if there is a way to obtain the fully resolved obj-code? I > wanted to load the functions into a shared memory, but how? The only thing > I receive is a function pointer, but I don't know how large the function > 'behind' is. Even a call to