search for: rsyncs

Here are strace outputs of a hung session, 2.6.3 on both ends (server, client process 1, client process 2): $ strace -t -p 4040 Attached to pid 4040 (windows pid 2488) 14:04:47 [unknown (0x938)] rsync 4040 _cygtls::remove: wait 0x0 14:05:17 [main] rsync 4040 select_stuff::wait: timed out 14:05:17 [main] rsync 4040 select_stuff::wait: returning 1 14:05:17 [main] rsync 4040 select_stuff::cleanup:

Hi I downloaded rsync Binaries for a redhat linux platform. I installed on the Red Hat Linux release 7.3 (Valhalla) using the command specified in readme.html rpm -Uvh rsync-*.rpm I got the following message package rsync-2.5.4-2 (which is newer than rsync-2.3.1-1) is already installed package rsync-2.5.4-2 (which is newer than rsync-2.3.2-1) is already installed package rsync-2.5.4-2

I am running RedHat 6.2 on many of my servers and am receiving the following errors when compiling Rsync 2.5.2: [root@wrapguy rsync-2.5.2]# make gcc -I. -I. -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W -c rsync.c -o rsync.o In file included from rsync.c:23: rsync.h:339: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union rsync.h:339: parse error before `inode' rsync.h:341: parse error before `dev'

In the mandriva rpm of rsync, we apply for our rpm the acl patch in the patches directory. I am trying to update our rpm to rsync 2.6.6 but one of the test failed with this patch. It seems to be a minor problem, but can you have a look ? Thanks by advance. Following the message (a bit long): ----- itemize log follows Testing for symlinks using 'test -h' +

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- Executing: rsync.exe -v -rlt --delete "/cygdrive/C/Documents and Settings/User/Local Settings/Application Data/Identities/{DFF16927-88E6-4EAA-A097-460B7E65289B}/Microsoft/Outlook Express/" "localhost::Backup/Outlook Express/" building file list ... done ./ Deleted Items.dbx rsync:

Hi, I'm trying to set up rsync, with the transfers originating from a Win2K box and going to a Linux box. Both boxes are on my home LAN, so ssh is not required; I thought I would simply use the rsync protocol. I set up xinetd on my Linux box to start a rsync server when needed. My first attempts at a test run failed like so: $ rsync -a /cygdrive/c/installs/palm rsync://192.168.2.3/palm

I have released rsync 3.2.3. It contains a smattering of bug fixes and various enhancements. To see a summary of all the recent changes, visit this link: https://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/NEWS#3.2.3 You can download the source tar file and its signature from here: https://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-3.2.3.tar.gz https://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-3.2.3.tar.gz.asc See the

I have released rsync 3.2.3. It contains a smattering of bug fixes and various enhancements. To see a summary of all the recent changes, visit this link: https://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/NEWS#3.2.3 You can download the source tar file and its signature from here: https://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-3.2.3.tar.gz https://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-3.2.3.tar.gz.asc See the

Since upgrading to cygwin 1.7.x, I'm unable to complete rsync jobs to a Debian machine (running stable). cygwin rsync is 3.0.6; Debian is 3.0.3. The transfer goes for a while and then just gets stuck halfway through an arbitrary file. If I cancel and restart, same thing (but gets a little further). If I manually copy the file in question, it will usually go a bit longer and then get stuck

Yes, it's finally that time -- rsync 3.0.0 has been released. This is a feature release that also includes quite a few bug fixes. I'd like thank everyone who participated in the development and testing of rsync. I hope that you enjoy this latest version! The 3.0.0 version number is such a large bump up from 2.6.9 due to the addition of an incremental recursion scan (which helps a lot

Yes, it's finally that time -- rsync 3.0.0 has been released. This is a feature release that also includes quite a few bug fixes. I'd like thank everyone who participated in the development and testing of rsync. I hope that you enjoy this latest version! The 3.0.0 version number is such a large bump up from 2.6.9 due to the addition of an incremental recursion scan (which helps a lot

I have made rsync 3.2.0pre3 available for testing. This is mainly some improvements in configuration and portability fixes. Let's see if this one will end up being the last "pre" version before 3.2.0. Please give it a try! Send feedback via email to the rsync mailing list. Bugs can be created via bugzilla tickets, github issues, or discussed on the mailing list. The changes since

I have released rsync version 2.6.5pre2 -- the second (and hopefully final) pre-release for 2.6.5. The 2.6.5 release is primarily a bug-fix release to squash some annoying bugs that made it into 2.6.4, though a few minor enhancements did make it in as well. To see all the changes since 2.6.4, go here: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.5pre1-NEWS To read the pre-release man

I have released rsync version 2.6.5pre2 -- the second (and hopefully final) pre-release for 2.6.5. The 2.6.5 release is primarily a bug-fix release to squash some annoying bugs that made it into 2.6.4, though a few minor enhancements did make it in as well. To see all the changes since 2.6.4, go here: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.5pre1-NEWS To read the pre-release man

Is it even remotely possible that after a successful rsync, the file sizes on both ends are different ??? We use rsync extensively to distribute our builds across all our development sites. Here is how our rsync process works 1. SiteA creates a build #1 2. SiteB rsync's build #1 3. SiteA creates a build #2 4. SiteB rsync's build #2 using contents of build #01 (i.e. we rsync build #02

Hi, I am running OS X Snow Leopard on the 'sender' side and Linux (2.6.32, possibly fedora but unsure) on the 'receiver' side. Both with rsync 3.0.9. If I run the following command from the command line: /usr/local/bin/rsync -av -e "ssh -i \ /Users/pedrofortunyayuso/.ssh/backup_pfortuny_net" \ --filter ': rsync.dirs' ~/ pfortuny at

Hi, I've build rsync-3.0.6 on a number of legacy unix systems, and on a few systems the regression tests showed up with some errors: HP-UX 11.11 and 11.23 (ia64): FAIL chown FAIL dir-sgid FAIL fuzzy FAIL itemize IRIX 6.5.13m: FAIL chown FAIL fuzzy FAIL itemize MacOS-X 10.4: FAIL chgrp the errors on "fuzzy" and "itemize" are

Hi all. I long time discover strange to me behavior. If I add --fake-super option on both sides rsync start always set owner and group of symlink. What interesting there no error, but it done each time as it has been changed. Simple reproduce: $ mkdir rsync.symlinks $ echo 'file content' > rsync.symlinks/file.itself $ ln -s file.itself rsync.symlinks/file.symlink Then try to transfer

Hello, I have compiled v3.0.4 of rsync per http://www.bombich.com/mactips/rsync.html. Unfortunately, I can't get rsync v3.0.4 to work properly. If I execute this command on the target Mac, I receive this error. sudo rsync -An --progress --log-file=docs_transfer server.domain.com:/Volumes/File_Storage/docs /Volumes/File_Storage rsync: on remote machine: -vnpAe.Ls: unknown option rsync

Hi all: I am trying to transfer a file from a machine A to a machine B. I ran a rsync deamon on machine B at a given port. Because there is a firewall between these two machines, I opened the port on the firewall. Is this enough to get rsync work through firewall? When I tried the transfer, I got the following error messages. my command: rsync -a --copy-links localfile rsync:://me@<my