Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1451 matches for "rsy".
Did you mean:
rsp
2020 May 22
2
[PATCH] Optimized assembler version of md5_process() for x86-64
This patch introduces an optimized assembler version of md5_process(),
the inner loop of MD5 checksumming. It affects the performance of all
MD5 operations in rsync - including block matching and whole-file
checksums.
Performance gain is 5-10% depending on the specific CPU.
Originally created by Marc Bevand and placed in the public domain,
later integrated into OpenSSL. This is the original version so no need
to muck about with OpenSSL license exemptions....
2016 Oct 17
2
Dict proxy client returning empty string instead of multiline string
> > > >>>>> On 10/16/2016 11:16 PM, Pierre Jaury wrote:
> > > >>>>>> Hello,
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I am using a dict proxy for my sieve extdata plugin to access some
> > > >>>>>> fields from an SQLite database (autoreply text and other
> > >
2016 Oct 16
2
Dict proxy client returning empty string instead of multiline string
Hello,
I am using a dict proxy for my sieve extdata plugin to access some
fields from an SQLite database (autoreply text and other
database-configured items).
All tests are performed against version 2.2.25.
$ dovecot --version
2.2.25 (7be1766)
My configuration looks like:
dict {
sieve = sqlite:/etc/dovecot/pigeonhole-sieve.dict
}
[...]
sieve_extdata_dict_uri = proxy::sieve
I
2008 Feb 11
2
[LLVMdev] "make check" failures: leaq in fold-mul-lohi.ll, stride-nine-with-base-reg.ll, stride-reuse.ll
I'm seeing the following failures with "make check" (x86-32 linux):
FAIL: test/CodeGen/X86/fold-mul-lohi.ll
Failed with exit(1) at line 2
while running: llvm-as < test/CodeGen/X86/fold-mul-lohi.ll | llc -march=x86-64 | not grep lea
leaq B, %rsi
leaq A, %r8
leaq P, %rsi
child process exited abnormally
FAIL:
2008 Feb 12
2
[LLVMdev] "make check" failures: leaq in fold-mul-lohi.ll, stride-nine-with-base-reg.ll, stride-reuse.ll
Hi Evan,
In -relocation-model=static mode, those tests are now getting
code like this
leaq A, %rsi
movss %xmm0, (%rsi,%rdx,4)
instead of this:
movss %xmm0, A(,%rdx,4)
This is specifically what these tests were written to catch :-).
Running them with -relocation-model=pic is hiding the real bug.
Dan
On Feb 11, 2008, at 11:22 PM, Evan Cheng wrote:
> Fixed.
2019 Jul 03
2
optimisation issue in an llvm IR pass
Hello,
I have an optimisation issue in an llvm IR pass - the issue being that
unnecessary instructions are generated in the final assembly (with -O3).
I want to create the following assembly snippet:
mov dl,BYTE PTR [rsi+rdi*1]
add dl,0x1
adc dl,0x0
mov BYTE PTR [rsi+rdi*1],dl
however what is created is (variant #1):
mov dl,BYTE PTR [rsi+rdx*1]
add dl,0x1
cmp
2015 Jul 27
3
[LLVMdev] i1* function argument on x86-64
I am running into a problem with 'i1*' as a function's argument which
seems to have appeared since I switched to LLVM 3.6 (but can have other
source, of course). If I look at the assembler that the MCJIT generates
for an x86-64 target I see that the array 'i1*' is taken as a sequence
of 1 bit wide elements. (I guess that's correct). However, I used to
call the function
2019 Jul 03
3
optimisation issue in an llvm IR pass
Hi Craig,
On 03.07.19 17:33, Craig Topper wrote:
> Don't the CreateICmp calls return a Value* with an i1 type? But then
> they are added to an i8 type? Not sure that works.
I had that initially:
auto cf = IRB.CreateICmpULT(Incr, ConstantInt::get(Int8Ty, 1));
auto carry = IRB.CreateZExt(cf, Int8Ty);
Incr = IRB.CreateAdd(Incr, carry);
it makes no difference to the generated assembly
2016 Oct 17
2
Dict proxy client returning empty string instead of multiline string
Hi!
This does sound like a bug, we'll have look.
Aki
On 17.10.2016 01:26, Pierre Jaury wrote:
> I dived a little bit further into the rabbit hole, up to the point where
> debugging has become unpracticle but I still haven't found the root
> cause for sure.
>
> I read most of the code for "p_strdup" based on datastack memory pools
> (which are used for
2018 Sep 11
2
Byte-wide stores aren't coalesced if interspersed with other stores
Andres:
FWIW, codegen will do the merge if you turn on global alias analysis for it
"-combiner-global-alias-analysis". That said, we should be able to do this
merging earlier.
-Nirav
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 8:33 PM, Andres Freund via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2018-09-10 13:42:21 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I have, in postres,
2008 Feb 12
0
[LLVMdev] "make check" failures: leaq in fold-mul-lohi.ll, stride-nine-with-base-reg.ll, stride-reuse.ll
Fixed. Thanks.
Evan
On Feb 11, 2008, at 2:35 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
> I'm seeing the following failures with "make check" (x86-32 linux):
>
> FAIL: test/CodeGen/X86/fold-mul-lohi.ll
> Failed with exit(1) at line 2
> while running: llvm-as < test/CodeGen/X86/fold-mul-lohi.ll | llc -
> march=x86-64 | not grep lea
> leaq B, %rsi
> leaq
2009 Sep 03
6
rsync
Hi
?
I put the rsync in cronjob
but it won't work
?
in root user cron
?
*/30? * * * *? /home/chloe/rsy.sh >/dev/null 2>&1
?
1/ why it needs pw when I run this rsy.sh in root?
but if I run it in chloe user, it doesn't need pw as I put authoized_key in remote host chloe
?
2/ why this root cronjob is...
2016 Oct 17
2
Dict proxy client returning empty string instead of multiline string
Oh duh, it used datastack pool. Try again with the attached patch? Please remember to clear the previous one out before trying.
Aki
>
> The trace is missing some symbols, I will debug tomorrow and see where
> the call comes from exactly.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> On 10/17/2016 06:23 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Looking at the code, I think the bug
2008 Feb 12
0
[LLVMdev] "make check" failures: leaq in fold-mul-lohi.ll, stride-nine-with-base-reg.ll, stride-reuse.ll
Fixed. However, I wonder if we are doing the right / smart codegen for
static codegen. AMD64 ABI document seems to indicate rip relative
addressing should be used even in this case (see page 38). You know
about about Linux addressing mode than I do. Please check.
Thanks,
Evan
On Feb 12, 2008, at 10:10 AM, Dan Gohman wrote:
> Hi Evan,
>
> In -relocation-model=static mode, those
2014 Jul 23
4
[LLVMdev] the clang 3.5 loop optimizer seems to jump in unintentional for simple loops
the clang 3.5 loop optimizer seems to jump in unintentional for simple loops
the very simple example
----
const int SIZE = 3;
int the_func(int* p_array)
{
int dummy = 0;
#if defined(ITER)
for(int* p = &p_array[0]; p < &p_array[SIZE]; ++p) dummy += *p;
#else
for(int i = 0; i < SIZE; ++i) dummy += p_array[i];
#endif
return dummy;
}
int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
2018 May 11
2
best way to represent function call with new stack in LLVM IR?
In the Zig frontend, we know at compile-time the entire call graph. This
means we know stack size for all functions and therefore the upper bound
stack usage.
Recursive calls can have a runtime-decided stack usage, and therefore I am
adding a frontend feature that will heap-allocate memory to use for some
function calls.
The idea is that recursion adds cycles to the call graph, and we know at
2003 Nov 26
2
creating graphs in BATCH mode
Hi
a short question is there a way to generate jpeg's etc. in BATCH mode ? The
following example does not work in BATCH:
I have a file called Rgraph.in:
*rsy at puffin*[15:11][~][57]> cat Rgraph.in
jpeg("/tmp/my.jpg")
hist(runif(10000))
dev.off()
*rsy at puffin*[15:11][~][58]>
*rsy at puffin*[15:09][~][55]> R BATCH Rgraph.in OUT
4.120u 0.160s 0:05.17 82.7% 0+0k 0+0io 2208pf+0w
*rsy at puffin*[15:09][~][56]> cat OUT
R : Cop...
2007 Nov 14
10
[GE users] Apple Leopard has dtrace -- anyone used the SGE probes/scripts yet?
Hi,
Chris (cc) and I try to get the SGE master monitor work with Apple Leopard
dtrace. Unfortunately we are stuck with the error msg below.
Anyone having an idea what could be the cause? What I can rule out as
cause is function inlining for the reasons explained below.
Background information on SGE master monitor implementation is under
http://wiki.gridengine.info/wiki/index.php/Dtrace
2015 Dec 17
2
llvm-3.6 MCAsmParser x64 Error "invalid operand for instruction" when msb set
Hello,
I am experiencing problems, when trying to assemble these two x86-64 Opcodes
"add r64, imm32"
"imul r64, r64, imm32"
When having the most significant bit set for imm32, for example:
"add rax, 0x80000000", "add rax, 0xffffffff", ...
"imul rbx, rsi, 0x80000000", "imul rbx, rsi, 0xffffffff", ...
The Error Message I receive is the
2016 Oct 17
1
Dict proxy client returning empty string instead of multiline string
While trying to isolate properly and reproduce, I was able to trigger
the same bug with the following code:
struct dict *dict;
char* dict_uri = "proxy::sieve";
char* key = "priv/key";
char* username = "admin at domain.tld";
char* value, error;
dict_drivers_register_builtin();
dict_init(dict_uri, DICT_DATA_TYPE_STRING, username,