Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "rsa768".
Did you mean:
a768
2023 Mar 30
0
Legacy Options
Hey there all,
I'm mentioning this as a "dev" issue because it's "Docs and Website", not
as a general "usage" question.
A few years back, I started a thread about RSA768 not being available in
SSH client any more, because I had lost access to my APC power strips
(which are on a NAT'd network, inside a data center, as a result). I
argued that "look, I know what I'm doing, I know this is safe, please
don't make me recompile the binary, or worse,...
2017 Dec 29
5
Legacy option for key length?
...ts and the VPN. Basically, the only time you need to log into
these is when you go to reboot something that's down.
Their web UI with SSL doesn't work with modern browsers.
Their CPU is...tiny, and their SSHd implementation is...old (and, I
believe, proprietary).
I think it defaults to RSA768, and even then, takes a good 15 seconds to
let you log in.
When trying to SSH to them most recently from a recent copy of MacOS, I
got the "Invalid Key Length" error.
I googled around for the release note and the source code commit that had
produced this, and then tried looking for w...
2018 Jan 02
3
Legacy option for key length?
...ur approach. It's the same reason we've
never implemented the null cipher and also one of the reasons we removed
SSHv1.
We try to balance compatibility with avoiding danger. This is why it's
still possible to explicitly enable (weak, but AFAIK not broken) DSA
keys if you need them, but RSA768 has actually been demonstrated to be
broken with an academic team factoring a key back in 2009 at a work
factor that is easily reachable by a medium botnet or cloud service.
Adding a switch to turn these back on would be IMO irresponsible.
If you think this is overly parentalistic and that an expe...