search for: rrsigs

I run "logcheck" on my servers and have noticed that my DC01 log has these: Feb 4 06:58:16 dc01 named[2096]: validating @0xb1c75c18: . NS: got insecure response; parent indicates it should be secure Feb 4 06:58:16 dc01 named[2096]: error (insecurity proof failed) resolving './NS/IN': 208.67.222.222#53 Feb 4 06:58:16 dc01 named[2096]: validating @0xb1c75c18: . NS: got insecure

Hi bob., As fas as i know opendns does not support dnssec. which is default enabled in bind9 try switchin your dns forwarders to googles ( which support dnssec ) and see what happens. or.. disable dnssec in bind9 Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: bob at donelsontrophy.net >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Bob of Donelson Trophy >Verzonden:

Not knowing bind that well, these changes take place in the /etc/bind/named.conf.options file? Is there anywhere else they need changing? --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-02-06 10:11, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Hi bob., > > As fas as i know opendns does not

...mation in order to tell the .tld that the domain.tld DNSSEC is valid and to maintain the DNSSEC authentication chain trust up to the root servers? You can go to the http://dnsviz.net/ site and can use nurdog.com as an example of what i mean. If I do not have to generate the keys every time the RRSIGs expire then the scripting or re-signing the zones is really trivial as I am in full control of my own DNS servers. It is even easier now if I don't have to generate new keys although that really isn't a difficult step. So maybe I asked the wrong question. Is there a way to re-sign the z...

...struct rrsetinfo **res) +{ + int result; unsigned int i; unsigned int j; + struct rrsetinfo *rrset = NULL; + + unsigned int index_ans; unsigned int index_sig; + struct rdatainfo *rdata; + + ldns_resolver * ldns_res; + ldns_rdf * domain = NULL; ldns_pkt * pkt; + ldns_rr_list * rrsigs = NULL; + ldns_rr_list * rrdata = NULL; + ldns_status err; + ldns_rr * rr; + + /* check for invalid class and type */ + if (rdclass > 0xffff || rdtype > 0xffff) { + result = ERRSET_INVAL; + goto fail; + } + + /* don't allow queries of class or type ANY */ + if (rdclass =...

Last weekend I had my DNSSEC keys expire. I discovered that they had expired the hard way... namely randomly websites could not be found and email did not get delivered. It seems that the keys were only valid for what I estimate was about 30 days. It is a real PITA to have update the keys, restart named and then update Godaddy with new digests. The first part of the problem is fairly

...) results in much smaller keys and signatures and is equivalent to about RSA-3072 in strength, and it uses a SHA-256 hash. However note that changing algorithms will result in validation failure for few days unless done carefully. > > If I do not have to generate the keys every time the RRSIGs expire then > the scripting or re-signing the zones is really trivial as I am in full > control of my own DNS servers. It is even easier now if I don't have to > generate new keys although that really isn't a difficult step. Yes that is what I do, daily via cron (or whenever I...

Is this mis-configuration, or just noise in my log? ??? 29-Apr-2018 00:50:26.056 general: warning: managed-keys-zone: No DNSKEY RRSIGs found for '.': success: 1 Time(s) ??? 29-Apr-2018 00:50:26.120 general: warning: managed-keys-zone: No DNSKEY RRSIGs found for 'dlv.isc.org': success: 1 Time(s) -chuck -- ACCEL Services, Inc.| Specialists in Gravity, Magnetics | (713)993-0671 ph. | and I...

On 2/12/19 7:26 PM, Paul R. Ganci wrote: > Last weekend I had my DNSSEC keys expire. I discovered that they had > expired the hard way... namely randomly websites could not be found and > email did not get delivered. It seems that the keys were only valid for > what I estimate was about 30 days. It is a real PITA to have update the > keys, restart named and then update Godaddy

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022 --- Comment #2 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> --- Patch applied, thanks. I still don't understand how it gets into this state since the space should be allocated immediately beforehand: if (rrset->rri_nsigs > 0) { rrset->rri_sigs = calloc(rrset->rri_nsigs,

Rick, My apologies :) zongo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [nsd-users] nsd can't bind udp socket: Address already in use Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 19:33:20 +0200 From: Rick van Rein (OpenFortress) <rick at openfortress.nl> To: zongo saiba <zongosaiba at gmail.com> zongo, you only sent this to me? -rick On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:04 PM, zongo saiba

Hi, I found a small issue with DNSSEC validation of SSHFP lookups. (For reference I used OpenSSH 6.8p1 on FreeBSD 10.1). The issues is that when DNSSEC valiation fails, ssh displays a confusing message to the user. When DNSSEC validation of a SSHFP record fails, ssh presents the user with "Matching host key fingerprint found in DNS. "Are you sure you want to continue connecting

Hi, ??? Anyone else had any issues with CentOS 6.10 bind DNS server issues this afternoon. At 16:26 (GMT) had alerts for DNS failures against our CentOS 6.10 bind DNS servers from our monitoring system. Sure enough DNS requests via the server was failing, checking the named.log showed dnssec issues; 25-Mar-2020 16:26:10.285 dnssec: info: validating @0xb48b17c0: push.services.mozilla.com

At Wed, 25 Mar 2020 17:03:23 +0000 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > ???????????? Anyone else had any issues with CentOS 6.10 bind DNS server issues Yes. The installed ISC DLV key installed with bind-9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.3.x86_64 seems to have expired and there does not appear to be a new bind-9.8.2 RPM with a new key. I guess you can

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1317 Summary: ssh uses obsolete SIG RRtype Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: svallet at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022 Bug #: 2022 Summary: ssh segfaults when using ldns, SSHFP, a DNSSEC-enabled resolver and a CNAME Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.0p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

...al 2016121200) 27-Dec-2019 23:20:21.227 notify: info: zone ixsdns.de/IN: sending notifies (serial 2018010102) *27-Dec-2019 23:20:28.434 dnssec: info: validating ./NS: got insecure response; parent indicates it should be secure* 27-Dec-2019 23:20:28.444 general: warning: managed-keys-zone: No DNSKEY RRSIGs found for '.': success 27-Dec-2019 23:20:29.219 dnssec: info: validating ./NS: no valid signature found 27-Dec-2019 23:20:29.714 dnssec: info:?? validating ./SOA: got insecure response; parent indicates it should be secure 27-Dec-2019 23:20:29.957 dnssec: info: validating ./NS: no valid sig...

Greetings, Unbound 1.4.20 OS X 10.8.4 - Server NSD 3.2.15 I have installed 'unbound' and it works nicely on my client (test purpose) - Client is MacBook Air. I have installed NSD (will be in replacement of BIND) on said client. All is good but when i try to start NSD Error --> nsd can't bind udp socket: address already in use. Everything is configured to bind to 127.0.0.1. #

Hello Wouter, We used tinydns for many years. After migration to nsd3 we miss only one feature present in tinydns only: tinydns may switch addresses by decreasing the ttl for old data and serve new data starting from a fixed timestamp. http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/tinydns-data.html: You may include a timestamp on each line. If ttl is nonzero (or omitted), the timestamp is a starting time for the

OpenSSH 4.9 has just been released. It will be available from the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/ shortly. OpenSSH is a 100% complete SSH protocol version 1.3, 1.5 and 2.0 implementation and includes sftp client and server support. Once again, we would like to thank the OpenSSH community for their continued support of the project, especially those who contributed code or patches,