search for: rrelease_18

...ed the CVS version of llvm and llvm-test. Presumably > this is the one that's scheduled to become 1.8 in a few days. Not really. The current CVS head is quite a ways past release 1.8 at this point. If you want to get the release 1.8 preview, please check out the release_18 branch: cvs co -rrelease_18 llvm > > (1) To install llvm, do I really need the llvm version of the gcc front > end? I have no special interest in yet another c/c++ conmpiler. No, you can build LLVM without it. Some functionality will be disabled, however (like the test cases for C/C++). > > (2) If I need l...

I just downloaded the CVS version of llvm and llvm-test. Presumably this is the one that's scheduled to become 1.8 in a few days. (1) To install llvm, do I really need the llvm version of the gcc front end? I have no special interest in yet another c/c++ conmpiler. (2) If I need llvm gcc, will the binary version suffice, or do I need to compile the CVS version? (3) If I need its source

...m-test. Presumably >> this is the one that's scheduled to become 1.8 in a few days. > > Not really. The current CVS head is quite a ways past release 1.8 at > this point. If you want to get the release 1.8 preview, please check out > the release_18 branch: > > cvs co -rrelease_18 llvm > >> >> (1) To install llvm, do I really need the llvm version of the gcc front >> end? I have no special interest in yet another c/c++ conmpiler. > > No, you can build LLVM without it. Some functionality will be disabled, > however (like the test cases for C/C...