Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "rredologfil".
Did you mean:
rredologfile
2004 Mar 30
1
RHEL 3 and OCFS 1.0.9-12 / 1.0.11-1
...on OCFS with RHAS 2.1. It doesn't say anything about RHEL3. >
We've been using async in our testing with no problems so far, and plan to >
use it in production unless Oracle feels the combination is not yet >
trustworthy.
well - tough one, it works, but the big issue is that you rredologfile need
to be contiguous on disk, otherwise you might have failures, exact same goes
for rhel3 as rhas21.
you can see that by running debugocfs
eg : /ocfs/log/foo1.dbf -> debugocfs -f /log/foo1.dbf /dev/sdXXX that will
show how many offsets (should only have one) in the extents if its more than...
2004 Jun 04
1
RHE L3 -- OCFS 1.0.9-12 and 1.0.12
...;t say anything
> about RHEL3.
> > We've been using async in our testing with no problems so
> far, and plan to
> > use it in production unless Oracle feels the combination is not yet
> > trustworthy.
>
> well - tough one, it works, but the big issue is that you rredologfile
> need to be contiguous on disk, otherwise you might have
> failures, exact
> same goes for rhel3 as rhas21. you can see that by running debugocfs
> eg :
> /ocfs/log/foo1.dbf -> debugocfs -f /log/foo1.dbf /dev/sdXXX
> that will show how many offsets (should only have one) in...
2004 Apr 22
1
A couple more minor questions about OCFS and RHE L3
...;t say anything
> about RHEL3.
> > We've been using async in our testing with no problems so
> far, and plan to
> > use it in production unless Oracle feels the combination is not yet
> > trustworthy.
>
> well - tough one, it works, but the big issue is that you rredologfile
> need to be contiguous on disk, otherwise you might have
> failures, exact
> same goes for rhel3 as rhas21. you can see that by running debugocfs
> eg :
> /ocfs/log/foo1.dbf -> debugocfs -f /log/foo1.dbf /dev/sdXXX
> that will show how many offsets (should only have one) in...
2004 Mar 08
0
A couple more minor questions about OCFS and RHE L3
...ts [mailto:wim.coekaerts@oracle.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 10:36 PM
> To: Derek Suzuki
> Cc: 'ocfs-users@oss.oracle.com'
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs-users] A couple more minor questions about OCFS and
> RHEL3
> well - tough one, it works, but the big issue is that you rredologfile
> need to be contiguous on disk, otherwise you might have
> failures, exact
> same goes for rhel3 as rhas21. you can see that by running debugocfs
> eg :
> /ocfs/log/foo1.dbf -> debugocfs -f /log/foo1.dbf /dev/sdXXX
> that will show how many offsets (should only have one) in...
2004 Mar 07
1
A couple more minor questions about OCFS and RHEL3
Oracle appears to have Wim chained in the basement, forced to answer
mailing list questions at all hours. I do appreciate it.
Our cluster has been stable since we installed RAC, but a few minor issues
have me concerned. First, our storage array seems to maintain continuous
low-level activity even when the database is shut down. The CPUs spend a
modest amount of time in iowait state while this