Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "rpvelloso".
Did you mean:
relloso
2015 Sep 09
3
APC BACK UPS 2200 model BZ2200BI-BR (New output
On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 22:25:54 -0400
Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote:
> @rpvelloso on Github suggested some changes (driver version v0.64)
> that should help with the initial sync:
>
> https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/commit/debc8e0280ea4de9a0db5ca34aa66705b285f61f
>
> It's the solis_debug branch on Github.
>
> Does that help? I'm concerned t...
2015 Aug 26
5
APC BACK UPS 2200 model BZ2200BI-BR (update)
Turns out another user reported the same issue with a slightly different model: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/231 <https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/231>
The "stty -f /dev/cuaU0 raw" trick should help, but I am confused as to why FreeBSD has different "raw" settings than what is set up at the same time as the baud rate:
2015 Sep 09
0
APC BACK UPS 2200 model BZ2200BI-BR (update)
@rpvelloso on Github suggested some changes (driver version v0.64) that should help with the initial sync:
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/commit/debc8e0280ea4de9a0db5ca34aa66705b285f61f
It's the solis_debug branch on Github.
Does that help? I'm concerned that it might get out of sync later,...
2015 Sep 11
0
APC BACK UPS 2200 model BZ2200BI-BR (New output)
...gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sep 9, 2015, at 2:06 PM, Mario Lobo <mlobo at digiart.art.br> wrote:
>>>
>>> By the constance of header and footer bytes, I think something
>>> different is going on now.
>>
>> Right, this is the resync code that @rpvelloso suggested.
>>
>> https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/231#issuecomment-138971923
>>
>>> It still identifying as a Solis 1.0 (which is not) but at least it
>>> is doing it on its own, without gdb.
>>
>> If I remember correctly, Bruno was ma...