search for: rproc_serial_features

...nit_vqs(portdev); @@ -1838,6 +1920,16 @@ static unsigned int features[] = { VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_MULTIPORT, }; +static struct virtio_device_id rproc_serial_id_table[] = { +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_REMOTEPROC) + { VIRTIO_ID_RPROC_SERIAL, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID }, +#endif + { 0 }, +}; + +static unsigned int rproc_serial_features[] = { +}; + #ifdef CONFIG_PM static int virtcons_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev) { @@ -1922,6 +2014,16 @@ static struct virtio_driver virtio_console = { #endif }; +static struct virtio_driver virtio_rproc_serial = { + .feature_table = rproc_serial_features, + .feature_table_size = ARRAY_S...

...nit_vqs(portdev); @@ -1838,6 +1920,16 @@ static unsigned int features[] = { VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_MULTIPORT, }; +static struct virtio_device_id rproc_serial_id_table[] = { +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_REMOTEPROC) + { VIRTIO_ID_RPROC_SERIAL, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID }, +#endif + { 0 }, +}; + +static unsigned int rproc_serial_features[] = { +}; + #ifdef CONFIG_PM static int virtcons_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev) { @@ -1922,6 +2014,16 @@ static struct virtio_driver virtio_console = { #endif }; +static struct virtio_driver virtio_rproc_serial = { + .feature_table = rproc_serial_features, + .feature_table_size = ARRAY_S...

...init_vqs(portdev); @@ -1838,6 +1901,16 @@ static unsigned int features[] = { VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_MULTIPORT, }; +static struct virtio_device_id rproc_serial_id_table[] = { +#ifdef CONFIG_REMOTEPROC_MODULE + { VIRTIO_ID_RPROC_SERIAL, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID }, +#endif + { 0 }, +}; + +static unsigned int rproc_serial_features[] = { +}; + #ifdef CONFIG_PM static int virtcons_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev) { @@ -1922,6 +1995,16 @@ static struct virtio_driver virtio_console = { #endif }; +static struct virtio_driver virtio_rproc_serial = { + .feature_table = rproc_serial_features, + .feature_table_size = ARRAY_S...

...init_vqs(portdev); @@ -1838,6 +1901,16 @@ static unsigned int features[] = { VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_MULTIPORT, }; +static struct virtio_device_id rproc_serial_id_table[] = { +#ifdef CONFIG_REMOTEPROC_MODULE + { VIRTIO_ID_RPROC_SERIAL, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID }, +#endif + { 0 }, +}; + +static unsigned int rproc_serial_features[] = { +}; + #ifdef CONFIG_PM static int virtcons_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev) { @@ -1922,6 +1995,16 @@ static struct virtio_driver virtio_console = { #endif }; +static struct virtio_driver virtio_rproc_serial = { + .feature_table = rproc_serial_features, + .feature_table_size = ARRAY_S...

...if (err < 0) { @@ -1838,6 +1924,16 @@ static unsigned int features[] = { VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_MULTIPORT, }; +static struct virtio_device_id rproc_serial_id_table[] = { +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_REMOTEPROC) + { VIRTIO_ID_RPROC_SERIAL, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID }, +#endif + { 0 }, +}; + +static unsigned int rproc_serial_features[] = { +}; + #ifdef CONFIG_PM static int virtcons_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev) { @@ -1922,6 +2018,20 @@ static struct virtio_driver virtio_console = { #endif }; +/* + * virtio_rproc_serial refers to __devinit function which causes + * section mismatch warnings. So use __refdata to silen...

...if (err < 0) { @@ -1838,6 +1924,16 @@ static unsigned int features[] = { VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_MULTIPORT, }; +static struct virtio_device_id rproc_serial_id_table[] = { +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_REMOTEPROC) + { VIRTIO_ID_RPROC_SERIAL, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID }, +#endif + { 0 }, +}; + +static unsigned int rproc_serial_features[] = { +}; + #ifdef CONFIG_PM static int virtcons_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev) { @@ -1922,6 +2018,20 @@ static struct virtio_driver virtio_console = { #endif }; +/* + * virtio_rproc_serial refers to __devinit function which causes + * section mismatch warnings. So use __refdata to silen...

...if (err < 0) { @@ -1838,6 +1967,16 @@ static unsigned int features[] = { VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_MULTIPORT, }; +static struct virtio_device_id rproc_serial_id_table[] = { +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_REMOTEPROC) + { VIRTIO_ID_RPROC_SERIAL, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID }, +#endif + { 0 }, +}; + +static unsigned int rproc_serial_features[] = { +}; + #ifdef CONFIG_PM static int virtcons_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev) { @@ -1922,6 +2061,20 @@ static struct virtio_driver virtio_console = { #endif }; +/* + * virtio_rproc_serial refers to __devinit function which causes + * section mismatch warnings. So use __refdata to silen...

...if (err < 0) { @@ -1838,6 +1967,16 @@ static unsigned int features[] = { VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_MULTIPORT, }; +static struct virtio_device_id rproc_serial_id_table[] = { +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_REMOTEPROC) + { VIRTIO_ID_RPROC_SERIAL, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID }, +#endif + { 0 }, +}; + +static unsigned int rproc_serial_features[] = { +}; + #ifdef CONFIG_PM static int virtcons_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev) { @@ -1922,6 +2061,20 @@ static struct virtio_driver virtio_console = { #endif }; +/* + * virtio_rproc_serial refers to __devinit function which causes + * section mismatch warnings. So use __refdata to silen...

This patch-set introduces a new virtio type "rproc_serial" for communicating with remote processors over shared memory. The driver depends on the the remoteproc framework. As preparation for introducing "rproc_serial" I've done a refactoring of the transmit buffer handling. NOTE: These two patches are identical to first two patches of the V8 patch-set, but are rebased to

This patch-set introduces a new virtio type "rproc_serial" for communicating with remote processors over shared memory. The driver depends on the the remoteproc framework. As preparation for introducing "rproc_serial" I've done a refactoring of the transmit buffer handling. NOTE: These two patches are identical to first two patches of the V8 patch-set, but are rebased to

From: Sjur Br?ndeland <sjur.brandeland at stericsson.com> This patch-set introduces a new virtio type "rproc_serial" for communicating with remote processors over shared memory. The driver depends on the the remoteproc framework. As preparation for introducing "rproc_serial" I've done a refactoring of the transmit buffer handling. Changes since v7: - Rebased to

From: Sjur Br?ndeland <sjur.brandeland at stericsson.com> This patch-set introduces a new virtio type "rproc_serial" for communicating with remote processors over shared memory. The driver depends on the the remoteproc framework. As preparation for introducing "rproc_serial" I've done a refactoring of the transmit buffer handling. Changes since v7: - Rebased to

...e); > > static unsigned int features[] = { > VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_SIZE, > @@ -2128,6 +2129,7 @@ static struct virtio_device_id > rproc_serial_id_table[] = { > #endif > { 0 }, > }; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(virtio, rproc_serial_id_table); > > static unsigned int rproc_serial_features[] = { > }; > @@ -2280,6 +2282,5 @@ static void __exit fini(void) > module_init(init); > module_exit(fini); > > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(virtio, id_table); > MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Virtio console driver"); > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

From: Sjur Br?ndeland <sjur.brandeland at stericsson.com> Add feature VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_DMA_MEM. If the architecture has DMA support and this feature bit is set, the virtio data buffers will be allocated from DMA memory. If the device requests the feature VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_DMA_MEM, but the architecture don't support DMA the driver's probe function will fail. This is needed for using

From: Sjur Br?ndeland <sjur.brandeland at stericsson.com> Add feature VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_DMA_MEM. If the architecture has DMA support and this feature bit is set, the virtio data buffers will be allocated from DMA memory. If the device requests the feature VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_DMA_MEM, but the architecture don't support DMA the driver's probe function will fail. This is needed for using

From: Sjur Br?ndeland <sjur.brandeland at stericsson.com> I thought rebasing rproc_serial to linux-next was going to be trivial. But when starting the merge I realized that I had to refactor the the patches from Masami Hiramatsu. The splice support has the same issue as I faced, with different type of buffers in the out_vq. So I ended up refactoring the splice functionality. The code size

From: Sjur Br?ndeland <sjur.brandeland at stericsson.com> I thought rebasing rproc_serial to linux-next was going to be trivial. But when starting the merge I realized that I had to refactor the the patches from Masami Hiramatsu. The splice support has the same issue as I faced, with different type of buffers in the out_vq. So I ended up refactoring the splice functionality. The code size

From: Sjur Br?ndeland <sjur.brandeland at stericsson.com> This patch-set introduces a new virtio type "rproc_serial" for communicating with remote processors over shared memory. The driver depends on the the remoteproc framework. As preparation for introducing "rproc_serial" I've done a refactoring of the transmit buffer handling. This patch-set is a rework of the

From: Sjur Br?ndeland <sjur.brandeland at stericsson.com> This patch-set introduces a new virtio type "rproc_serial" for communicating with remote processors over shared memory. The driver depends on the the remoteproc framework. As preparation for introducing "rproc_serial" I've done a refactoring of the transmit buffer handling. This patch-set is a rework of the

This patchset replace CONFIG_PM with CONFIG_PM_SLEEP for all virtio drivers and virtio pci driver. With patch 1/2, two compile warnings are eliminated for virtio pci driver, and patch 2/2 is a clean up for all virtio drivers as suggested by Amit Shah. Aaron Lu (2): virtio_pci: pm: Use CONFIG_PM_SLEEP instead of CONFIG_PM virtio: pm: use CONFIG_PM_SLEEP instead of CONFIG_PM