search for: rpmsg_device_op

...irtIO clients and > no support for a VirtIO server. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg > server implementation. This looks really useful, but why is it implemented as an API and not as a real vhost driver which implements an rpmsg bus? If you implement it as a vhost driver which implements rpmsg_device_ops and rpmsg_endpoint_ops, then wouldn't you be able to implement your vhost-sof driver using the normal rpmsg APIs? I tried quickly hooking up this code to such a vhost driver and I was able to communicate between host and guest systems with both rpmsg-client-sample and rpmsg-char which almost...

...irtIO clients and > no support for a VirtIO server. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg > server implementation. This looks really useful, but why is it implemented as an API and not as a real vhost driver which implements an rpmsg bus? If you implement it as a vhost driver which implements rpmsg_device_ops and rpmsg_endpoint_ops, then wouldn't you be able to implement your vhost-sof driver using the normal rpmsg APIs? I tried quickly hooking up this code to such a vhost driver and I was able to communicate between host and guest systems with both rpmsg-client-sample and rpmsg-char which almost...

...ver. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg > > > server implementation. > > > > This looks really useful, but why is it implemented as an API and not as > > a real vhost driver which implements an rpmsg bus? If you implement it > > as a vhost driver which implements rpmsg_device_ops and > > rpmsg_endpoint_ops, then wouldn't you be able to implement your > > vhost-sof driver using the normal rpmsg APIs? > > Sorry, not sure what you mean by the "normal rpmsg API?" Do you mean the > VirtIO RPMsg API? But that's the opposite side of the li...

...ver. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg > > > server implementation. > > > > This looks really useful, but why is it implemented as an API and not as > > a real vhost driver which implements an rpmsg bus? If you implement it > > as a vhost driver which implements rpmsg_device_ops and > > rpmsg_endpoint_ops, then wouldn't you be able to implement your > > vhost-sof driver using the normal rpmsg APIs? > > Sorry, not sure what you mean by the "normal rpmsg API?" Do you mean the > VirtIO RPMsg API? But that's the opposite side of the li...

...ost-based RPMsg > > > > server implementation. > > > > > > This looks really useful, but why is it implemented as an API and not as > > > a real vhost driver which implements an rpmsg bus? If you implement it > > > as a vhost driver which implements rpmsg_device_ops and > > > rpmsg_endpoint_ops, then wouldn't you be able to implement your > > > vhost-sof driver using the normal rpmsg APIs? > > > > Sorry, not sure what you mean by the "normal rpmsg API?" Do you mean the > > VirtIO RPMsg API? But that's th...

...support for a VirtIO server. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg > > server implementation. > > This looks really useful, but why is it implemented as an API and not as > a real vhost driver which implements an rpmsg bus? If you implement it > as a vhost driver which implements rpmsg_device_ops and > rpmsg_endpoint_ops, then wouldn't you be able to implement your > vhost-sof driver using the normal rpmsg APIs? Sorry, not sure what you mean by the "normal rpmsg API?" Do you mean the VirtIO RPMsg API? But that's the opposite side of the link - that's the gues...

v3: - address several checkpatch warnings - address comments from Mathieu Poirier v2: - update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype - drop patch #6 - it depends on a different patch, that is currently an RFC - address comments from Pierre-Louis Bossart: * remove "default n" from Kconfig Linux supports RPMsg over VirtIO for "remote processor" /AMP use cases.

v3: - address several checkpatch warnings - address comments from Mathieu Poirier v2: - update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype - drop patch #6 - it depends on a different patch, that is currently an RFC - address comments from Pierre-Louis Bossart: * remove "default n" from Kconfig Linux supports RPMsg over VirtIO for "remote processor" /AMP use cases.