Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "rpmsg_addr_any".
2020 Jun 18
2
[PATCH v3 5/5] vhost: add an RPMsg API
...msg/rpmsg_char.c
index a76b963a7e5..7a03978d002 100644
--- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
+++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
@@ -104,6 +104,11 @@ static int rpmsg_ept_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *buf, int len,
struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev = priv;
struct sk_buff *skb;
+ if (rpdev->dst == RPMSG_ADDR_ANY) {
+ printk("%s: got client address %#x from first rx!\n", __func__, addr);
+ rpdev->dst = addr;
+ }
+
skb = alloc_skb(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!skb)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -235,6 +240,12 @@ static ssize_t rpmsg_eptdev_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf,
goto unlock_e...
2020 Jun 18
2
[PATCH v3 5/5] vhost: add an RPMsg API
...msg/rpmsg_char.c
index a76b963a7e5..7a03978d002 100644
--- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
+++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
@@ -104,6 +104,11 @@ static int rpmsg_ept_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *buf, int len,
struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev = priv;
struct sk_buff *skb;
+ if (rpdev->dst == RPMSG_ADDR_ANY) {
+ printk("%s: got client address %#x from first rx!\n", __func__, addr);
+ rpdev->dst = addr;
+ }
+
skb = alloc_skb(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!skb)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -235,6 +240,12 @@ static ssize_t rpmsg_eptdev_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf,
goto unlock_e...
2020 Jun 18
0
[PATCH v3 5/5] vhost: add an RPMsg API
....7a03978d002 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> @@ -104,6 +104,11 @@ static int rpmsg_ept_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *buf, int len,
> struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev = priv;
> struct sk_buff *skb;
>
> + if (rpdev->dst == RPMSG_ADDR_ANY) {
> + printk("%s: got client address %#x from first rx!\n", __func__, addr);
> + rpdev->dst = addr;
> + }
> +
> skb = alloc_skb(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!skb)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -235,6 +240,12 @@ static ssize_t rpmsg_eptdev_write(struct file *filp,...
2020 Jun 17
2
[PATCH v3 5/5] vhost: add an RPMsg API
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 08:05:41PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport
> protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and
> no support for a VirtIO server. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg
> server implementation.
This looks really useful, but why is it implemented as an API and not as
a real
2020 Jun 17
2
[PATCH v3 5/5] vhost: add an RPMsg API
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 08:05:41PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport
> protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and
> no support for a VirtIO server. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg
> server implementation.
This looks really useful, but why is it implemented as an API and not as
a real
2020 May 29
15
[RFC 00/12] Audio DSP VirtIO and vhost drivers
This patch set is a follow up to "Add a vhost RPMsg API" [1], it is
marked as an RFC because firstly it depends on the RPMsg API series
and secondly it is currently being reviewed on ALSA and SOF mailing
lists, but any early comments from virtualisation developers would be
highly appreciated too!
Thanks
Guennadi
[1]
2020 May 29
15
[RFC 00/12] Audio DSP VirtIO and vhost drivers
This patch set is a follow up to "Add a vhost RPMsg API" [1], it is
marked as an RFC because firstly it depends on the RPMsg API series
and secondly it is currently being reviewed on ALSA and SOF mailing
lists, but any early comments from virtualisation developers would be
highly appreciated too!
Thanks
Guennadi
[1]