search for: rpkts

...were >> increased). >> - Very minor rx regression in some cases. >> - Improvemnt on TCP_RR (at most 16%). > >Forget to mention, the following test results by order are: > >1) Guest TX >2) Guest RX >3) TCP_RR > >> size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ >> 64/ 1/ +9%/ -17%/ +5%/ +10%/ -2% >> 64/ 2/ +8%/ -18%/ +6%/ +10%/ -1% >> 64/ 4/ +4%/ -21%/ +6%/ +10%/ -1% >> 64/ 8/ +9%/ -17%/ +6%/ +9%/ -2% >> 256/ 1/ +20%/ -1%/ +15%/ +11%/ -9% &g...

...were >> increased). >> - Very minor rx regression in some cases. >> - Improvemnt on TCP_RR (at most 16%). > >Forget to mention, the following test results by order are: > >1) Guest TX >2) Guest RX >3) TCP_RR > >> size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ >> 64/ 1/ +9%/ -17%/ +5%/ +10%/ -2% >> 64/ 2/ +8%/ -18%/ +6%/ +10%/ -1% >> 64/ 4/ +4%/ -21%/ +6%/ +10%/ -1% >> 64/ 8/ +9%/ -17%/ +6%/ +9%/ -2% >> 256/ 1/ +20%/ -1%/ +15%/ +11%/ -9% &g...

...hroughput in some cases. - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 105%) expect for the huge write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were increased). - Very minor rx regression in some cases. - Improvemnt on TCP_RR (at most 16%). size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ 64/ 1/ +9%/ -17%/ +5%/ +10%/ -2% 64/ 2/ +8%/ -18%/ +6%/ +10%/ -1% 64/ 4/ +4%/ -21%/ +6%/ +10%/ -1% 64/ 8/ +9%/ -17%/ +6%/ +9%/ -2% 256/ 1/ +20%/ -1%/ +15%/ +11%/ -9% 256/ 2/ +15%/ -6%/ +15%/ +8%/ -8%...

...hroughput in some cases. - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 105%) expect for the huge write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were increased). - Very minor rx regression in some cases. - Improvemnt on TCP_RR (at most 16%). size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ 64/ 1/ +9%/ -17%/ +5%/ +10%/ -2% 64/ 2/ +8%/ -18%/ +6%/ +10%/ -1% 64/ 4/ +4%/ -21%/ +6%/ +10%/ -1% 64/ 8/ +9%/ -17%/ +6%/ +9%/ -2% 256/ 1/ +20%/ -1%/ +15%/ +11%/ -9% 256/ 2/ +15%/ -6%/ +15%/ +8%/ -8%...

...20%) for latency (TCP_RR). - Get a better or minor regression on most of the TX tests, but see some regression on 4096 size. - Except for 8 sessions of 4096 size RX, have a better or same performance. - CPU utilization were incrased as expected. TCP_RR: size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ 1/ 1/ +8%/ -32%/ +8%/ +8%/ +7% 1/ 50/ +7%/ -19%/ +7%/ +7%/ +1% 1/ 100/ +5%/ -21%/ +5%/ +5%/ 0% 1/ 200/ +5%/ -21%/ +7%/ +7%/ +1% 64/ 1/ +11%/ -29%/ +11%/ +11%/ +10% 64/ 50/ +7%/ -19%/ +8%/ +8%/ +2%...

...20%) for latency (TCP_RR). - Get a better or minor regression on most of the TX tests, but see some regression on 4096 size. - Except for 8 sessions of 4096 size RX, have a better or same performance. - CPU utilization were incrased as expected. TCP_RR: size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ 1/ 1/ +8%/ -32%/ +8%/ +8%/ +7% 1/ 50/ +7%/ -19%/ +7%/ +7%/ +1% 1/ 100/ +5%/ -21%/ +5%/ +5%/ 0% 1/ 200/ +5%/ -21%/ +7%/ +7%/ +1% 64/ 1/ +11%/ -29%/ +11%/ +11%/ +10% 64/ 50/ +7%/ -19%/ +8%/ +8%/ +2%...

...e can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were > increased). > - Very minor rx regression in some cases. > - Improvemnt on TCP_RR (at most 16%). Forget to mention, the following test results by order are: 1) Guest TX 2) Guest RX 3) TCP_RR > size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ > 64/ 1/ +9%/ -17%/ +5%/ +10%/ -2% > 64/ 2/ +8%/ -18%/ +6%/ +10%/ -1% > 64/ 4/ +4%/ -21%/ +6%/ +10%/ -1% > 64/ 8/ +9%/ -17%/ +6%/ +9%/ -2% > 256/ 1/ +20%/ -1%/ +15%/ +11%/ -9% > 256/ 2/ +1...

...better or minor regression on most of the TX tests, but see > some regression on 4096 size. > - Except for 8 sessions of 4096 size RX, have a better or same > performance. > - CPU utilization were incrased as expected. > > TCP_RR: > size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ > 1/ 1/ +8%/ -32%/ +8%/ +8%/ +7% > 1/ 50/ +7%/ -19%/ +7%/ +7%/ +1% > 1/ 100/ +5%/ -21%/ +5%/ +5%/ 0% > 1/ 200/ +5%/ -21%/ +7%/ +7%/ +1% > 64/ 1/ +11%/ -29%/ +11%/ +11%/ +10% > 64/ 50/ +...

...;> - Very minor rx regression in some cases. >>> - Improvemnt on TCP_RR (at most 16%). >> Forget to mention, the following test results by order are: >> >> 1) Guest TX >> 2) Guest RX >> 3) TCP_RR >> >>> size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ >>> 64/ 1/ +9%/ -17%/ +5%/ +10%/ -2% >>> 64/ 2/ +8%/ -18%/ +6%/ +10%/ -1% >>> 64/ 4/ +4%/ -21%/ +6%/ +10%/ -1% >>> 64/ 8/ +9%/ -17%/ +6%/ +9%/ -2% >>> 256/ 1/ +20%/ -1%/ +...

...hput in some cases. - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 50%) expect for the huge write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were increased). - Very minor rx regression in some cases. - Improvemnt on TCP_RR (at most 17%). Guest TX: size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ 64/ 1/ +18%/ -10%/ +7%/ +11%/ 0% 64/ 2/ +14%/ -13%/ +7%/ +10%/ 0% 64/ 4/ +8%/ -17%/ +7%/ +9%/ 0% 64/ 8/ +11%/ -15%/ +7%/ +10%/ 0% 256/ 1/ +35%/ +9%/ +21%/ +12%/ -11% 256/ 2/ +26%/ +2%/ +20%/ +9%/ -10% 256/ 4/ +23%/ 0%/ +21%/ +10%/ -9% 256/ 8/ +23%/ 0%/ +21%/ +9%/ -9% 512/ 1/ +31%/ +9%/...

...hput in some cases. - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 50%) expect for the huge write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were increased). - Very minor rx regression in some cases. - Improvemnt on TCP_RR (at most 17%). Guest TX: size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ 64/ 1/ +18%/ -10%/ +7%/ +11%/ 0% 64/ 2/ +14%/ -13%/ +7%/ +10%/ 0% 64/ 4/ +8%/ -17%/ +7%/ +9%/ 0% 64/ 8/ +11%/ -15%/ +7%/ +10%/ 0% 256/ 1/ +35%/ +9%/ +21%/ +12%/ -11% 256/ 2/ +26%/ +2%/ +20%/ +9%/ -10% 256/ 4/ +23%/ 0%/ +21%/ +10%/ -9% 256/ 8/ +23%/ 0%/ +21%/ +9%/ -9% 512/ 1/ +31%/ +9%/...

...ck connected mlx4 - Guest with 8 vcpus and 1 queue Results: - TCP_RR was imporved obviously (at most 27%). And cpu utilizaton was also improved in this case. - No obvious differences in Guest RX throughput. - Guest TX throughput was also improved. TCP_RR: size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ 1/ 1/ +27%/ 0%/ +27%/ +27%/ +25% 1/ 50/ +2%/ +1%/ +2%/ +2%/ -4% 1/ 100/ +2%/ +1%/ +3%/ +3%/ -14% 1/ 200/ +2%/ +2%/ +5%/ +5%/ -15% 64/ 1/ +20%/ -13%/ +20%/ +20%/ +20% 64/ 50/ +17%/ +14%/ +16%/ +16%/ -11%...

...ck connected mlx4 - Guest with 8 vcpus and 1 queue Results: - TCP_RR was imporved obviously (at most 27%). And cpu utilizaton was also improved in this case. - No obvious differences in Guest RX throughput. - Guest TX throughput was also improved. TCP_RR: size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ 1/ 1/ +27%/ 0%/ +27%/ +27%/ +25% 1/ 50/ +2%/ +1%/ +2%/ +2%/ -4% 1/ 100/ +2%/ +1%/ +3%/ +3%/ -14% 1/ 200/ +2%/ +2%/ +5%/ +5%/ -15% 64/ 1/ +20%/ -13%/ +20%/ +20%/ +20% 64/ 50/ +17%/ +14%/ +16%/ +16%/ -11%...

...struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats) +static void vrf_get_stats64(struct net_device *dev, + struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats) { int i; @@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ static struct rtnl_link_stats64 *vrf_get_stats64(struct net_device *dev, stats->rx_bytes += rbytes; stats->rx_packets += rpkts; } - return stats; } /* Local traffic destined to local address. Reinsert the packet to rx diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c index a479cd99911d..40f26b69beb1 100644 --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c @@ -1073,8 +1073,8 @@ stati...

...struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats) +static void vrf_get_stats64(struct net_device *dev, + struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats) { int i; @@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ static struct rtnl_link_stats64 *vrf_get_stats64(struct net_device *dev, stats->rx_bytes += rbytes; stats->rx_packets += rpkts; } - return stats; } /* Local traffic destined to local address. Reinsert the packet to rx diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c index a479cd99911d..40f26b69beb1 100644 --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c @@ -1073,8 +1073,8 @@ stati...