search for: rpbarri

Greetings, My R package has been showing warnings of the form: `validspamobject()` is deprecated. Use `validate_spam()` directly None of my code uses the function validspamobject, so it must be a problem in another package I'm calling, possibly spam or spdep. Has this problem occurred with other people? It doesn't have any deleterious effect, but it's annoying. In particular,

Hello, If you want to determine where the warning is generated, I think it's easiest to run R with options(warn=2). In that case all warnings are converted to errors, and you have more debugging tools, e.g. you can run traceback() to see the calling stack, or use options(error=recover). Hope you can catch it. Best regards, Emil Bode is an institute of the Dutch Academy KNAW

Hi, Thanks for all your help. The problem with an error involving validspamobject() has been resolved, as a new version of spdep (0.7-7) was just released and it seems to have stopped using the deprecated function. Ron B. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I have submitted an updated R package to CRAN, the only problem seems to be the examples take too long to run on Windows and Debian. Several examples take over 10 seconds and the entire set takes around 110 seconds. However, I don't see what the 'target' amount of time is. How much will this need to be sped up to pass the test? Also, are there some tricks to speeding up

Greetings, I have noticed two possible small glitches with build and INSTALL. First, when I run R CMD build latticeDensity, I get the following message: *excluding invalid files from 'latticeDensity' Subdirectory R contains invalid file names: R However, all the files end up in the zip file (or tar) just fine, and neither INSTALL

Greetings, I am sure I'm missing the obvious, but my 00Index file in the demo subdirectory is not recognized by R CMD check (the demo runs fine, but I get a WARNING from R CMD check about a lack of demo/00Index file. When I invoke demo() in R I see the name but not description of the demo). Is there documentation (other than 'Writing R extensions') on putting together the demo

After looking at a few discussions of this problem online, I can't seem to find a good solution. When running a CHECK on a package I'm working on (which passed all tests a few years ago), I get the following 'significant warning': Warning: replacing previous import ?spam::tail? by ?utils::tail? when loading ?latticeDensity? Warning: replacing previous import ?spam::head? by

Greetings, When using a 'foreign' function (from another package, say function 'whatever' from package 'foo'), you can of course just require the package and then just have whatever(...) in your code. However, I would like to use the foo::whatever(...) form instead, just for documentation purposes (easier to see what function comes from what package). Is there a

Greetings, I wanted to add a dataset to a complete R package I am working on (the package cleanly installs and passes the R CMD check). The data (a matrix) was saved, and the save() image dragged to the /data folder, and is a .Rdata file. It can be read directly using load (see below), but now the R CMD check indicates "subdirectory data contains no datasets" and it won't load