search for: rpb

...ion. Has anyone done this before? Do they allow functions to use anything other than atomic, volatile variables? Even that won't work: void *volatile p = 0; try { p = malloc(7); } finally { free(p); } The try block would look something like: call _malloc movq %rax, p(%rpb) If you take an exception between those two instructions, you are leaking memory. /jakob

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From

...n France, we should make sure that Spain is actually there. That is a fair objection. :) > void *volatile p = 0; > try { > p = malloc(7); > } > finally { > free(p); > } > > The try block would look something like: > > call _malloc > movq %rax, p(%rpb) > > If you take an exception between those two instructions, you are leaking memory. This is primarily an argument that C is not a good language to write async-exceptions-safe code in. Java has similar potential races with async exceptions for non-memory resources that are cleaned up with...

On Jun 13, 2011, at 10:50 AM, John McCall wrote: > On Jun 13, 2011, at 10:30 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: >> The try block would look something like: >> >> call _malloc >> movq %rax, p(%rpb) >> >> If you take an exception between those two instructions, you are leaking memory. > > This is primarily an argument that C is not a good language to write async-exceptions-safe code in. Java has similar potential races with async exceptions for non-memory resources that a...

My data set has a mixed level of measurement: Nominal scale - location (city) Ordinal scale - temperature (low, medium, high) Interval scale - age & value Just curious if there is an R package available that will handle the mixed "Level of Measurement". Looking to do graphical presentation of the correlation and also a qualitative analysis of the correlation.  Thanks again for

...and DO_IPV6 Product: iptables userspace Version: 1.2.7a Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy: rpb@community.net.uk CC: netfilter-buglog@lists.netfilter.org With DO_IPV6 undefined and NO_SHARED_LIBS defined the "extensions" Makefile incorrectly tries to include the IPv6 extensions. I found this while trying to build a small iptables user space command for an embedd...

On Jun 12, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Jun 12, 2011, at 4:40 PM, John McCall wrote: > >> On Jun 12, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote: >> >>> On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Sohail, >>>> >>>>> Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions?

On Jun 12, 2011, at 4:40 PM, John McCall wrote: > On Jun 12, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote: > >> On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >> >>> Hi Sohail, >>> >>>> Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? >>> >>> not currently. The first step in this direction is to get rid of the

...     | 0  | REGS                                          | |-------------------------------------------------------------------| In a RBP-based frame the RBP register is pushed on the stack immediately after the return address, then RSP is moved to RBP. To unwind, RSP is restored with the current RPB value, then RBP is restored by popping off the stack, and the return is done by popping the stack once more into the instruction pointer. All preserved registers are saved in a small range in the stack that starts at RBP-8 to RBP-2040.  The offset/8 relative to RBP is encoded in the 8-bit OFFSET f...

...| > |-------------------------------------------------------------------| > > In a RBP-based frame the RBP register is pushed on the stack immediately > after the return > address, then RSP is moved to RBP. To unwind, RSP is restored with the > current RPB value, > then RBP is restored by popping off the stack, and the return is done by > popping the stack once > more into the instruction pointer. > > All preserved registers are saved in a small range in the stack that > starts at RBP-8 to RBP-2040. > The offset/8 relative to R...

...> > |-------------------------------------------------------------------| > > > > In a RBP-based frame the RBP register is pushed on the stack immediately > > after the return > > address, then RSP is moved to RBP. To unwind, RSP is restored with the > > current RPB value, > > then RBP is restored by popping off the stack, and the return is done by > > popping the stack once > > more into the instruction pointer. > > > > All preserved registers are saved in a small range in the stack that > > starts at RBP-8 to RBP-2040. &gt...

...| > |-------------------------------------------------------------------| > > In a RBP-based frame the RBP register is pushed on the stack immediately > after the return > address, then RSP is moved to RBP. To unwind, RSP is restored with the > current RPB value, > then RBP is restored by popping off the stack, and the return is done by > popping the stack once > more into the instruction pointer. > > All preserved registers are saved in a small range in the stack that > starts at RBP-8 to RBP-2040. > The offset/8 relative to R...

Hi, Thanks for all your help. The problem with an error involving validspamobject() has been resolved, as a new version of spdep (0.7-7) was just released and it seems to have stopped using the deprecated function. Ron B. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...ible to have the identical example in two help files but only have them run once (other than the obvious, which is putting a 'do not run' on one of them, which would seem to invite possible bad code)? Thanks for any information. Ron Barry On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 4:56 PM, Ronald Barry <rpbarry at alaska.edu> wrote: > Greetings, > My R package has been showing warnings of the form: > > `validspamobject()` is deprecated. Use `validate_spam()` directly > > None of my code uses the function validspamobject, so it must be a problem > in another package I'm c...

Bonjour, Mon serveur Samba 2.2.1a (sur Suse 7.3 PPC) a quelques soucis depuis 2/3 jours. Le dernier en date : les utilisateurs sont authentifi?s mais le lecteur ne se connecte pas correctement dans le script (si on ouvre le lecteur concern? il est vide). L'architecture : 2 serveur Samba (fichiers / impression) avec 30 utilisateurs depuis 1 an plusieurs serveurs NT4 dont le contr?leur

Greetings, My R package has been showing warnings of the form: `validspamobject()` is deprecated. Use `validate_spam()` directly None of my code uses the function validspamobject, so it must be a problem in another package I'm calling, possibly spam or spdep. Has this problem occurred with other people? It doesn't have any deleterious effect, but it's annoying. In particular,