search for: row_mask

I'm wondering about the focus on bound_cntl. Any cleared bit in the row_mask or bank_mask will also disable updating the result. Brian -----Original Message----- From: Connor Abbott [mailto:cwabbott0 at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 6:13 PM To: tstellar at redhat.com Cc: Matt Arsenault; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Kolton, Sam; Sumner, Brian; Pykhtin, Valery Su...

...d >>>>>> v_nop >>>>>> v_foo_f32 v1, v1, v1 row_shr:8 bank_mask:0xc // Instruction 5 >>>>>> v_nop // Add two independent instructions to avoid a data hazard >>>>>> v_nop >>>>>> v_foo_f32 v1, v1, v1 row_bcast:15 row_mask:0xa // Instruction 6 >>>>>> v_nop // Add two independent instructions to avoid a data hazard >>>>>> v_nop >>>>>> v_foo_f32 v1, v1, v1 row_bcast:31 row_mask:0xc // Instruction 7 >>>>>> >>>>>> The problem is tha...

...ndent instructions to avoid a data hazard >>>> v_nop >>>> v_foo_f32 v1, v1, v1 row_shr:8 bank_mask:0xc // Instruction 5 >>>> v_nop // Add two independent instructions to avoid a data hazard >>>> v_nop >>>> v_foo_f32 v1, v1, v1 row_bcast:15 row_mask:0xa // Instruction 6 >>>> v_nop // Add two independent instructions to avoid a data hazard >>>> v_nop >>>> v_foo_f32 v1, v1, v1 row_bcast:31 row_mask:0xc // Instruction 7 >>>> >>>> The problem is that the way these instructions use the DPP...

...>>>>>> v_nop >>>>>> v_foo_f32 v1, v1, v1 row_shr:8 bank_mask:0xc // Instruction 5 >>>>>> v_nop // Add two independent instructions to avoid a data hazard >>>>>> v_nop >>>>>> v_foo_f32 v1, v1, v1 row_bcast:15 row_mask:0xa // Instruction 6 >>>>>> v_nop // Add two independent instructions to avoid a data hazard >>>>>> v_nop >>>>>> v_foo_f32 v1, v1, v1 row_bcast:31 row_mask:0xc // Instruction 7 >>>>>> >>>>>> The problem is t...

...v_foo_f32 v1, v1, v1 row_shr:4 bank_mask:0xe // Instruction 4 v_nop // Add two independent instructions to avoid a data hazard v_nop v_foo_f32 v1, v1, v1 row_shr:8 bank_mask:0xc // Instruction 5 v_nop // Add two independent instructions to avoid a data hazard v_nop v_foo_f32 v1, v1, v1 row_bcast:15 row_mask:0xa // Instruction 6 v_nop // Add two independent instructions to avoid a data hazard v_nop v_foo_f32 v1, v1, v1 row_bcast:31 row_mask:0xc // Instruction 7 The problem is that the way these instructions use the DPP word isn't currently expressible in LLVM. We have the llvm.amdgcn.mov_dpp intri...

...ction 4 >> v_nop // Add two independent instructions to avoid a data hazard >> v_nop >> v_foo_f32 v1, v1, v1 row_shr:8 bank_mask:0xc // Instruction 5 >> v_nop // Add two independent instructions to avoid a data hazard >> v_nop >> v_foo_f32 v1, v1, v1 row_bcast:15 row_mask:0xa // Instruction 6 >> v_nop // Add two independent instructions to avoid a data hazard >> v_nop >> v_foo_f32 v1, v1, v1 row_bcast:31 row_mask:0xc // Instruction 7 >> >> The problem is that the way these instructions use the DPP word isn't >> currently expre...

...>>>>>>>> v_foo_f32 v1, v1, v1 row_shr:8 bank_mask:0xc // Instruction 5 >>>>>>>> v_nop // Add two independent instructions to avoid a data hazard >>>>>>>> v_nop >>>>>>>> v_foo_f32 v1, v1, v1 row_bcast:15 row_mask:0xa // Instruction 6 >>>>>>>> v_nop // Add two independent instructions to avoid a data hazard >>>>>>>> v_nop >>>>>>>> v_foo_f32 v1, v1, v1 row_bcast:31 row_mask:0xc // Instruction 7 >>>>>>>> >>&gt...

The HTB scheduler code is a mess, this patch set does some basic house cleaning. The first four should cause no code change, but the last two need more testing. -- Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> "And in the Packet there writ down that doome" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to